Page 40 - Studio International - December1996
P. 40

Above
                               Linear Construction 1961
                               Phosphor bronze, brass and wood
                               63 in. high x 8 in. diameter
                               Above right
                               Variations on a Theme 1961
                               Brass
                               53 x 13 x 23 in.
                                5 1/8 x 1 7/8 x 2 3/4 in.
                                5 1/8 x 3 1/2 x 2 5/8 in.
                               Brass and wood base
                               16 x 5 x 3 in.
                               Collection: S. B. Nitikman
                               Right
                               Linear Construction 1962
                               Phosphor bronze, brass and black painted wood
                                     7 1/2 x 4 1/2 x 4 1/2 in.
                               Photo: John Pasmore
                               has been brought into a living relationship with the idea:  on. A streak of puritanism, fastidious and sardonic, has
                               is, in effect, drawn.                              kept him clear of the chic, and has set him to cut a way
                                Until a few years ago, Kenneth Martin's reputation was  for himself out of the  cul-de-sac  of an art based on an
                               confined to a small circle—fellow artists, architects, a  inflated projection of the ego. And a sure instinct for the
                               handful of collectors. His work is published in Continental  nourishment he needed has kept him in touch with the
                               magazines and his name features in international direc-  main body of abstract art abroad. His advance since
                               tories of abstract art, but here he has been absurdly  the late forties has been a steady one, punctuated with
                               neglected. Now, at the height of his form and exploring  extraordinary flashes and leaps. The first premises were
                               new themes with the assurance and vigour of complete  simple—perhaps over-simple, dogmatic. Since then so
                               maturity, he stands as something of a touchstone for a  much has been invested in them, they have been thought
                               new generation of artists for whom the talented sturm und  and experienced at such depth that his work is totally
                               drang of the fifties is as empty a proposition as it was for  consolidated. Now, luminous, dry, snapping with vitality,
                               Martin himself. He is in a class apart in his generation  it rides clear in an atmosphere of total freedom.
                               and if one is to ask for reasons for his neglect, the quick   There is a traditional opposition between the rational
                               answer is simply to point to what is specific, a-typical, in  and the intuitive in art, between the intellectual pro-
                               his development.                                   gramme and the unmeditated song, and this polarity is
                                He has been the opposite of precocious. Born in the same  often exploited to establish facile values: clarity versus
                               decade as Hepworth, Richards, Piper, Medley, Pasmore,  obscurity, heartlessness versus warmth and so on. This is
                               Coldstream, Bacon, he has proceeded slowly, his work  to miss the essential point underlying any such opposi-
                               growing like the rings of a hardwood tree out of a solid  tion, which is that in any given situation it has to do with
                               and consistent core. The criticism has often been made,  creative freedom. Everybody knows that where academism
                               and it is well founded, that what has vitiated so much of  reigns freedom has to do with breaking rules. What is not
                               English art has been an excess of talent, a dearth of ideas;  so readily seen is that where a myth of creative omni-
                               that it has tried to support itself by brilliant eccentricity  potence rules, freedom has to do with finding a way of
                               by an eclectic aestheticism, by literary undertones, per-  working which circumvents the swollen balloon of tem-
                               sonal symbolism, nature-sense, lyricism. This is like a  perament and places work somehow outside the reach of
                               catalogue of everything that Martin has turned his back   mere talent. For if the victim of academism cries out in
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45