Page 24 - Studio International - October 1966
P. 24

Phillip King            art  where  there  is  no  dogma  and  where  new standards   directed and reinvigorated the sculptural axis,  the work
       Slit1966                are in formation.                                  is mostly to be read in time. It forms, in effect, a sequence
       Arborite
       78 X  126 X  69in.       What  are  these  emerging  standards  or-to  put  it   of events that develops into the  whole  form.  The sculp­
                               another  way-what  are  some  of  the  intellectual  and   ture  expands  into  its  space.  A  closeness  to  the  process
                               practical  concerns  that are redefining the sculptural  art   becomes important. Caro has said:
                               in Britain?                                          Outside  when  you  can  get  back  to  look  at  them  from  a
                                First, perhaps,  is the vexed question of the relationship   distance the grip of the sculpture is diffused.
                               of  the  spectator  to  the  sculpture.  The  conception  of   Turnbull  has evolved  an  opposite  view-opposite,  that
                               sculpture as a heroic expression has been pretty generally   is,  in  intent- for,  again,  the  form  organizes  experience
                               abandoned by these younger artists;  the sense of it as an   and is its veritable equivalent. He writes:
                               object  related  to  landscape  or  part  of landscape  is  also   I  would  like  my  work  to  be  perceived  instantly,  without
                               denied.  Sculpture has become intimate and indoor  (how   radical  change  as  one  moves  around  it.  This  destroys  the
                               much so  was seen in the recent  outdoor sculpture  exhibi­  involvement with time (which is a formal 'slice oflife').
                               tion in Battersea Park). It is not to be made for a particu­  The centrality of the piece, its separateness as a focus of
                               lar place, however, but projected as autonomous.   experience,  has  become  an  important  consideration  for
                                How,  then,  is  it  to  be  seen?  For  Caro,  who  has  re-  Tucker. He writes:
       174
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29