Page 26 - Studio International - February 1967
P. 26

Extreme left
                                                                                                            Moholy-Nagy
                                                                                                           Light-Space Modulator
                                                                                                           1922-30
                                                                                                           Steel and plexiglass
                                                                                                           Coll.: Busch-Reisinger
                                                                                                           Museum, Harvard University
                                                                                                           Left
                                                                                                            Moholy-Nagy
                                                                                                           Study for Light-Space
                                                                                                           Modulator 1923(?)
                                                                                                           Ink
                                                                                                           Photo: courtesy Sybil
                                                                                                            Moholy-Nagy
                                                                                                            Below
                                                                                                            Alexander Calder
                                                                                                            Retrospective exhibition,
                                                                                                            Tate Gallery, London 1962




































                               if they did not know Gabo at first, it was he, with so few  the eye, either with black and white alternations or with
                               works, who defined a truly kinetic art in terms which,  juxtaposed colours close in value, that contours lose their
                               almost half a century later, still applied. The greater part  position and containment and boundaries appear to shift.
                               of movement in art today stems from the austere canons  Such phenomena, used by Vasarely, Bridget Riley,
                               of Constructivism. Some artists, however, looked to Dada  Tadasky, Apollonio, and, by now, innumerable others,
                               and the absurd. There was, as a result, some polarization  are pseudo-kinetic. Cinétisme was the French word, which,
                               of styles; it is usually quite clear which is which. The  though coming out of Greek, seems to have picked up
                               Constructivist wing worked with movement itself without  something from the cinema on the way (possibly through
                               meaning; the Dadaist used imagery, suggestion, associa-  the influence of Eggeling and Richter). There, too, the
                               tion, and ideas inherited from collage, with movement  image is in fact still, and movement is an illusion supplied
                               used to underline, intensify, sometimes transform.   by the brain; such a work is not truly kinetic. A kinetic
                                There are two areas bearing some relation to kinetic art,  work, this writer believes, moves within itself, changing
                               but not of it, which are undefined and unclear: works  the space relation of the parts; and this movement is a
                               dependent on the movement of or by the spectator; and  dominant theme, not an incidental quality.
                               the use of optical phenomena which simulate movement.   An artist is free to combine one means with another and
                               In the former the object is fixed and the relation between  movement lends itself to alliances; thus Soto combines
                               its parts changes, through parallax, as the spectator  moirage with actual movement and with parallax. The
                               moves his head or walks by (as in Agam's painting or the  intrinsic qualities of certain substances or objects may,
                               moire effects of superimposed grids) ; or the object is still  when moving, reveal themselves with special vividness, as
                               but movable and the spectator can transform it into an-  with Haacke's cylinders of liquids or Medalla's foam or
                               other stationary position (as in Lygia Clark). In these it is  Boriani's magnetized iron filings, or may be transformed
                               the spectator who is kinetic; he always has been. The  as in Duchamp's discs.
                               latter concerns certain optical phenomena which so dazzle    One of the most fruitful alliances is movement with light.
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31