Page 38 - Studio International - February 1967
P. 38

term Environmental if it was synonymous with Kinetic,  to Vasarely. In 1955 the Argentinian artist Gregorio
                                or if it denoted a quality that could be found in the same  Vardanega claimed that: 'Luminosity, precision, har-
                                measure throughout the whole range of Kinetic art. In  mony and especially space are elements which give a new
                                fact this is not so. There is a difference not simply in de-  significance to the work of art— they bring with them joy,
                                gree but also in kind between works which are designed  optimism and perhaps even a less equivocal type of con-
                                to animate an existing environment, and works which  duct, making their contribution towards a fuller life.'
                                create an environment of their own. This might be ex-  There is, of course, an often insurmountable problem in
                                pressed as a distinction between environmental Art, on  realizing the projects which an artist of this persuasion
                                the one hand, and Environmental art, on the other.   will naturally devise. Vardanega's project for a tower of
                                 Kinetic art is environmental not simply because of the  twenty metres, with a sequence of flashing lights and
                                aesthetic factor but also because of the methods by which  corresponding sound effects, exists up to now only in a
                               it is produced. The case of Vasarely is an excellent ex-  small maquette. Vasarely calls for a new class of men—
                                ample of the way in which the abandonment of tradi-  'the Toscaninis of the visual arts' — to investigate and
                                tional materials has led to a new environmental status for  carry out the environmental projects of artists. One of
                                the work of art. From 1950 he has maintained the habit  these has already emerged in the person of Bernard
                                of working with small maquettes, and using projectors to  Lassus, who approaches the problem of animating our
                               determine what size they should be given in the 'public'  environment from an architect's point of view, and has
                               versions. In 1953 he wrote: 'I make everything in a small  already carried out numerous projects in buildings.
                               format, that is the first stage, and I keep it for myself—  Until this type of mediation between the artist and the
                               from this I draw functional works (I commission a picture  wider environment becomes generally accepted, Vasarely
                               from myself), I execute works in a large format for exhi-  and Vardanega are obliged to work within the established
                                bitions, I have a tapestry made, I work out a film.' It is  systems of presentation, producing their works mainly for
                                the functional nature of the work that is important here.  exhibition in galleries and museums. In the past few
                               Vasarely does not merely design specific works for specific  years, however, numerous artists and groups of artists
                               settings, which is a task that any artist might be expected  have turned to the different problem of creating an arti-
                                to undertake. His method of working is inseparably  ficial environment, which the spectator is able to affect,
                               linked with the notion of function, since the maquette  and even transform, by his own actions. The most interest-
                               would remain no more than a blueprint if 'commissions'  ing theorists of this Environmental art (with the accent
                               were not made from it.                             on the first word) have been the members of the Groupe
                                This is not simply a theoretical point. In the Documenta  Recherche d'Art Visuel. When the G.R.A.V. presented
                               III exhibition at Cassel, the section entitled 'Bild und  their first `Labyrinthe' at the Paris Biennale of 1963, they
                               Raum' was planned with the object of allowing a wide  explained that this composite work was 'in one sense a
                               variety of artists to arrange their work in an appropriate  transposition on to an architectural scale of some of the
                               environment. Many of these artists made excellent use of  principal aspects of their work'. But they added that it
                               the opportunity. Sam Francis' three painted panels,  was also a pointer towards entirely new experiments
                               designed for the Entrance Hall of the Kunsthalle, Basel,  involving the participation of the spectator. In the same
                               were arranged in lantern, forming an area alive with  year Le Parc, one of the members of the group, gave this
                               Rococo movement. Louise Nevelson's dead black reliefs,  description of a projected 'place of activation' : 'In this
                               on the other hand, composed a small room as solemn as  place there would be neither pictures hung from the walls,
                               an unopened pyramid. But the seven magnificent works  nor actors; neither passive spectators nor masters nor
                               by Vasarely did more than lend character to the sur-  pupils; simply certain elements, and people with time to
                               rounding space. Beyond their application to a particular  spare. This hypothetical place could be a large room
                               setting, they testified to the existence of a type of creation  15 x 15 x 6 metres in size, all white, with a system of
                               by its very nature divorced from the traditional systems of  panels and mobile bridges. Alternatively, a series of 50
                               production and exhibition. The generality of their pic-  centimetre cubes could be assembled to create different
                               torial language and the lucidity of their organization  floor levels and masses.'
                               suggested a reintroduction of the traditional Classicist   In concentrating their attention almost exclusively upon
                               principle: 'l'ordre agrandit l'espace'. Far from being  the interaction between spectator and work, the G.R.A.V.
                               dehumanized, they gave no hint of disequilibrium be-  were making a decisive departure from the systems of
                               tween the work of art and the outside world. They were a  presentation characteristic of the visual arts. But it is
                               fitting illustration to the statement which Vasarely made  important to realize that they were not cutting themselves
                               in 1953: 'I take it for granted that man possesses a deep-  away from all current forms of artistic activity. Their
                               rooted plastic instinct. Just like his instinct for rhythm or  choice of the word `Labyrinthe' already opens up a signi-
                               music. I believe that there are fresh possibilities of satis-  ficant field of reference.
                               fying man's natural instinct for sensory pleasures. The   The Groupe Recherche d'Art Visuel's intention to 'de-
                               crowd, the masses, a multitude of human beings. That is  mystify' the plastic arts can be related to parallel efforts
                               the new dimension. That is unlimited space and the truth  in the realms of music and literature. Like Boulez and
                               of structures. Art is the plastic aspect of the community.'   Robbe-Grillet they rely on the use of non-sensuous,
                                This conviction that the Kinetic artist is creating a new  labyrinthine structures to create works which are entirely
                               form of order, to satisfy a human instinct which makes  devoid of Expressionist connotations. Robbe-Grillet
                               itself known not simply in the gallery and the museum  might almost be describing one of the 'unstable' optical
                               but in the community at large, is far from being confined   pictures of the G.R.A.V. when he writes in La Jalousie:
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43