Page 21 - Studio International - October1968
P. 21

to Nicholas, preserve their learned ignorance   nation, could not function in the modern   manufacturer and his works are not things,
             in their quest for transcending experience.  world in which we have, as Octavo Paz has   they are acts.' These acts, Paz says with a
             They do not by any means dispense with   brilliantly observed in his new study of   slightly tremulous voice, teach us that the
             discursive logic. Rather, they augment it   Marcel Duchamp, critique rather than ideas,   true goal of artistic activity is not the art
             with a new kind of logic demanded by  and methods rather than systems.* 'Our      object, but freedom—freedom from the
             experiences that go beyond the bounds of   only Idea, in the real sense of the word, is the   tyranny of 'taste', a modern invention, and
             conventional discursive logic. They turn   Critique.'                             from the tyranny of the consumer society.
             their knowledge upon itself, so that specula-  The critique, as Paz sees it, enters twentieth-  'The history of modern painting, from the
             tion becomes an infinite series of logical   century art definitively with the words of   Renaissance to the present, can be seen as a
             arguments, absorbed finally in the supra-  Mallarmé, one of Duchamp's acknowledged   progressive transformation of the work of
             logical realm of learned ignorance.      masters. In a previous essay, 'Los Signos en   art into an artistic object: passage from  a
              The beauty of Nicholas's creation—the   Rotacion', Paz had described 'Un Coup de  vision to a sensible thing.' The 'readymades',
             doctrine of learned ignorance—is that it shuts   Des' as a critique which not only encloses   he claims, are a critique both of taste and of
             nothing out (it carries along classical logic   its own negation, but makes of this negation   the object as such.
             for instance, while augmenting it with the   its point of departure and its substance. In   But a critique is not a vision, and there is
             eruptive insight of intuition that later   it, the world as an image has evaporated.   hidden, perhaps unconsciously, in Paz's
             Nietzsche was to frame in words to per-  Throughout his life, Paz wrote, Mallarmé   interpretation a nostalgia for the grand
             fection) and at the same time, never loses  spoke of a book which would be the double   visions which, unlike the open spaces of
             sight of an ultimate purpose—to understand   of the cosmos. Yet, it is remarkable that   Mallarmé and Duchamp, are grand enclo-
             human experience as totality; to recognize   having dedicated so many pages to telling   sures. Are, in fact, images.
             that the human imagination conceives of the   us how this book would be, Mallarmé had   The new values proferred in critical jour-
             inconceivable, and therefore both the in-  so little to reveal to us of his vision of the   nals, and used to excavate the motives of
             conceivable and the comprehensible form   world. 'The truth is that he didn't see it: the   X, focus on surfaces, not images. Very often
             the content of metaphysical speculation.   world has ceased to have a form.'      the notion of an image is dispensed with
              If the doctrine of learned ignorance were   Without a world view, or an idea of cosmos,   altogether. Deliberately. For instance, in the
             practised today, the study of an artist's life's  the modern artist is thrust into the open   time of Nicholas of Cusa, mathematical
             work would include all the minute data so   spaces offered to us by Mallarmé and subse-  speculation was very lively. Such a notion
             fondly recorded by the critic citing X's   quent artists, and from there into the 'zone   as squaring the circle became an activity
             writings, but only as incidental to the pursuit   of silence' implicit in 'Igitur'. The zones of   out of which came a wealth of implications,
             of the experienced whole meaning of his  silence that seem at once threatening and   associations, symbols and metaphors. The
             oeuvre. The interpreter's own experience of   alluring to the modern artist, are perfectly   human imagination has not ceased to
             the work is what offers insight into its whole   characterized both by Mallarmé's poem and   square the circle, but it has ceased to gener-
             meaning, not his ability to search out facts.   by Duchamp's  Grand Verre.  'Un Coup de  ate associations. There is beauty, of course,
              In practical terms, it will mean that when   Des' cannot have a final interpretation   in the simple fact of squaring a circle. The
             he is discussing X's letter to the editor, signed   because the last word of the poem is not a   artists who today deal with the raw materials
             by him and a fellow artist, but partly drafted   final word. The  Grand Verre,  which Paz  of mathematics—series, infinite numbers,
             by still a third artist, he will remember that   says was definitively unfinished  in 1923, is   indeterminacy and so on—stop short pur-
             there are at least two and possibly more  similar to this unfinal last word : 'it's an open   posively of the metaphorical visions these
             truths enfolded in the letter. The one truth is   space which provokes new interpretations   materials once inspired. They are opponents
             that three men had a community of spirit   and evokes, in its unfinished condition, the   of metaphysics, as are their interpreters. By
             which resulted in a letter on that particular  Void which is the substance of the work. This   virtue of their refusals, their 'zones of
             day and under those particular circum-   void is the absence of the Idea'. Finally, Paz   silence', they reach the irony which passes
             stances. The other is that each man had an   observes, the poem and the picture affirm   even Duchamp's irony: they reach finality,
             underside to his mind, something behind   simultaneously the absence of signification   but not the final analysis. Since theirs is a
             the frontal plane of the words, so to speak,   and the necessity to have it, and it is in this   commentary by default, or by detachment
             some moral energy which was other than   that the signification of the two works   if you prefer, commentary on their
             the words. He had temperament, moods,    lies.                                    commentary can only close off and never elucidate,
             temporary enthusiasms and little idiosyn-  Out of all the ironies and meta-ironies in   can never image forth a vision. Critiques of
             cracies. The two truths, so different in   which Duchamp indulged himself, and to   critiques, interpretations of interpretations,
             texture, would be balanced against the truth   which the century is addicted, Paz extracts   all embodied in a non-Procustean bed of
             experienced in the work, and from the whole   certain positive propositions, mostly of a   data, may lead to a kind of freedom, but not
             process of speculation.                  philosophical order. Duchamp's gesture,   the exhilarating freedom of learned ignor-
              It is possible, though, that the doctrine of   particularly in the 'readymades', is inter-  ance. Rather, it is the freedom of immobility
             learned ignorance, which is very similar is   preted as a rejection of the bourgeois con-  . . . a somewhat deathly release from the
             substance to Coleridge's view of the imagi-   ception of the art object. 'The artist is not a   vicissitudes of experience.

             London commentaries are by Charles Spencer,  a   Corrections                      the September issue).
             frequent contributor to art journals, William Lipke,   We regret that it was reported in the September issue   Marcel Duchamp ou le Château de la Purité, Editions
             an American art historian who has specialized in   (On exhibition) that the bust by Ernst Eisenmayer   Claude Grandua, Paris, 1967.
             twentieth-century British art;  Tom Hudson,   being shown at the Mercury Gallery is one of an   It was incorrectly reported in the September issue
             Director of Studies at Cardiff College of Art;   edition of 76. It is, in fact, one of an edition of six.   that Mr Ben Nicholson was receiving the honorary
             Barbara Reise,  recently appointed senior lecturer   This exhibition continues until 19 October.   freedom of St. Ives, Cornwall. In fact the honorary
             in history of art at Leeds University;  Joseph   The first and second prize of the Arts Council of   freedom was conferred on Dame Barbara Hepworth
             Masheck, an American researcher doing art history   Northern Ireland's Open Painting Competition were   and Mr Bernard Leach on 23 September.
             research and writing in Dublin and London.   shared between Harold Cohen, Alan Wood and   Charles Spencer contributed the review of the Gar-
                                                      Michael Simpson (not Michael Wood, as printed in   bitsch Collection in our September issue.
                                                                                                                                   123
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26