Page 62 - Studio International - October1968
P. 62

Isaac Witkin                             crisp presentation of this permutated pattern   below  Isaac Witkin Baalbec 1968
     at Waddington Gallery                    dominates the grave-yard metaphor which arises   alumi num 96 x 108 in.
      5-26 September                          from one shape; and the gentle angles and human-
                                              sized scale give the whole work a natural intimacy
     There is a singular joy and lack of embarrassment   and quiet sadness more important to its mood than
     about Isaac Witkin's sculpture at the WADDINGTON   its possible associations.  Baalbec  is more monu-
      GALLERY.  Its large and easy scale, sensuous direct-  mentally rational in mood, composed of similarly
      ness, and fertility of formal ideas make most   shaped cubic volumes of different sizes which are
      recently exhibited 'young British sculpture' of the   all humanly comprehensible and controllable. But it
      St Martin's scene look tight, self-conscious, and   is not a pile of cubic volumes a la David Smith : the
     academic. His present artistic freedom is in marked   three lower verticals are slimmer and smaller than
     contrast to the communal problem-solving of his   the horizontally aligned volumes which seem to
      British counterparts.                    defy gravity above; the weightlessness of the forms
      So is his emphasis on the essentially sculptural   is accentuated by the light-reflecting hard dark-
      experience of real space, scale, light on mass, sense   brown surface; the spaces between the volumes is
      of place, and kinesthesia. One is invited to walk   formed like the volumes themselves, and the result
      around or through the works in a directed manner;   is a formal composition in which space and 'mass'
      one's own space is cupped, swirled, articulated, by   play equal parts. This composition moves, both
      the works' concavity, directional axial movement,   diagonally up and down and in a swirl of axes
      or placement of separate parts; and one is often   un-confined to any implied frame, constantly con-
      conscious of a monolithic total form for each piece   fronting one directly with an assymetric tension
      implied in its self-presentation through front, back   resolved but not balanced. Assymetric tension also
      or side views. This makes Witkin's work almost   plays a major role in  Shogun,  the most tough,
      classical in its acceptance of a sculptural tradition   disturbing, and gutsy piece in the show. With cool
      extending past contemporary glossy magazines to   calm Witkin has thrust a concave curved plane
      old masters like Brancusi and Bernini; as such it   cupping space into one side of the hieratic frontality
      forms a closer parallel to the work of Barnett New-  of huge folded planes. These two parts are not
      man, Anthony Benjamin, and Tony Smith than to   `attached', they do not flow into each other grace-
      the currently popular niggling over bridging  fully, nor is their juncture hidden; they are
      `painting' and 'sculpture' categories through  somehow interrelated by a bent plane which is the
      multi-coloured three-dimensional designs.   only convex element in the piece. The vast ex-
       Witkin's three works amply fill the gallery space.   panses of planes opening into space, an expansive-
      Each is life-sized or larger; each has a surface of   ness enhanced by the light and warm terracotta
      light-and space-sensitized single colour which   colour of the copper-flecked surface, contributes to
      directs attention from its steel material to its   the awesome quality of this impossible piece. Its
      sculptural form; each uses basic planes and volumes   sublimity, contrasted with the rational grandeur of
      in a non-referential manner. But each work is   Baalbec and the natural intimacy of Dirge, presents
      quite different from the others.         a very impressive demonstration of Witkin's
       Perhaps the most internally self-satisfying work is   mastery of the language of scale, light, space,
      the very intuitive Dirge: a place-establishing piece   weight, and composiotin. And one leaves the gal-
      of three separate parts. Each part is a slab-like   lery with a re-affirmed feeling that, in the hands of
      plane floating above its bent base; each plane floats   an artist as good as Witkin, sculpture as a tradi-
      in a different gravitationally-pulled slant; each   tional medium of communication for basic human
      plane has a different combination of curved,   feelings is still extremely vibrant.
      pointed, of flat terminations. The simple logic and             Barbara M. Reise



      Charles Spencer talks to                younger artists; but a total dual commitment is rare. Even   excellent theatre designers who cannot draw a line.
      Nicholas Georgiadis                      artists like Berard and Tchelitchew, distinguished in both   Thus you can see that the aims of these two activi-
      exhibiting oils at the New Art Centre    fields, emerge as one performer, not two distinct ones as   ties -stage designing and painting-are so different
      16 October-9 November                   you do.                                   that they have to be kept separate.
      and gouaches and watercolours            N.G. In order to discuss this I have to step out of
      at Annely Juda                           myself and see myself as a kind of freak. To me the   I suppose one reason for critical ambivalence towards
      22 October-23 November                   only problem is time-the theatre devours an enor-  your work is the traditional English suspicion of diverse
                                               mous amount of time, which is why I only design   talents in one person, a preference for cosy simplification.
      Born in Athens in 1925, Georgiadis trained as an   very occasionally.             Perhaps.
      architect in Athens and New York before studying
      at the Slade School from 1953 to 1955. He  now   You must be aware of a certain reluctance to accept you   On the other hand, I hope in a more subtle way, I do find
      teaches at the Slade and is a British citizen. His  fully as a painter; one critic even suggested you should   much in common between your stage work and the
      first one-man exhibition was at the  REDFERN   stick to the theatre.              paintings. For instance both share strong architectonic
      GALLERY in 1959 and he has held subsequent shows   I can assure you that there are people in the theatre   preferences; in the paintings there is even a suggestion of
      at the MOLTON  and  HAMILTON GALLERIES;  also at   who suggest I should stick to painting. This sort of  a proscenium framework in which the architectural or
      the  MERLIN GALLERY,  Athens,  NEW GALLERY,  Bel-  comment is totally irrelevant, stemming from  geometrical shapes are contained.
      fast and  GALLERIA D'ARTE NAVIGLIO 2, Milan.   cliché ideas about theatre design. It reminds me of   It is possible that my use of symmetry reads to
      Group exhibitions include the 1955 Carnegie Inter-  provincial landladies who refuse lodgings to   you as something resembling a proscenium. But
      national, Documenta III, Kassel, 1964, and the   theatricals.                     if you examine what I am doing you will find that
      Venice Biennale, 1966.                                                            in both the symmetrical and assymetrical pictures
       He has designed for the Metropolitan Opera   Do you see the two activities as mutally sustaining, does   the aim is to suggest an image continuing beyond
      New York, the Old Vic London, Royal Court   one feed the other; or do you keep them quite separate.?   the limits of the canvas.
      Theatre London, Vienna State Opera, La Scala   You seem to be under a misconception. I think it is
      Milan, Staatsoper Berlin, and for the Royal   the word design which is confusing. One talks of   Yes, I see that clearly; of course frames contain and can
      Opera House Covent Garden, including the   theatre design and one is also aware that design is   be overrun, that is a kind of drama. You would not, I
      ballets 'Romeo and Juliet' and 'The Nutcracker',   of extreme importance in painting. In the theatre   imagine, deny the preoccupation with architecture.
      and Verdi's 'Aida'.                      the major component is atmosphere, that indefinable   In the theatre I only use architectural shapes if
                                               quality achieved by the most diverse means to   they are needed: you cannot afford to have
      C.S. Many famous painters have designed for the theatre   assist the production in involving the public in the   obsessions in the theatre, that is the prerogative of
      -Picasso, Matisse, Derain, de Chirico, as well as   fate of the protagonists. This is why you can have   the author, whether writer, composer or choreo-
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67