Page 64 - Studio International - May 1969
P. 64

hinting always that these artists had begun to   ings that followed these abstractions are, if   It appears to me that in the last years of the
      decline in their powers.                  anything, a consummation of a concept. By   1950s, de Kooning recapitulated his two basic
      Death cut short the cavilling about Pollock   means of embedding (those little nodes of   modes of experiencing—he moved from
      for the most part, but de Kooning, alive and   form that sometimes coalesce into a readable   women to abstractions, and again, from
      very much kicking, is still a target, and the   anthropomorphic clue) Pollock elucidated   women to abstractions—but with a new pur-
      same old phrases still recur. One journalist   this new experience of form. It was no longer   pose, which was to bring his usual devices
      literally used the word 'declining' in his   simply a graph of an activity, but a system of   such as the blur, the repeat, the pockets of
      review of the later phases in de Kooning's art   activities and transformations attached to   formlessness, and the savage linear forces into
      at the large retrospective at the  MUSEUM OF   distinct images. The eyes, limbs, and heads   new contexts. His most extraordinary move,
      MODERN ART.  If the juxtaposition of these   that lie ensconced in the shifting black planes   to my mind, was in the landscape-like inven-
      two important exhibitions—Pollock's black-  reassert the starting point sometime in the   tions of the late 1950s. Here, the notorious
      and-white at Marlborough, and de Kooning's   late 1930s, and make visible Pollock's dyna-  expressionist brushwork was made to serve
      exhibitions at the museum and at KNOEDLERS'   mic vision of other spaces, other forms. Far   explicitly as a definition of his feelings before
      —reveals anything, it reveals that the notion   from being the 'all-over' spaces so inaccurately   the void. The 'form' of the paintings de-
      of decline lodged in these critics' minds is   ascribed to Pollock's paintings, these spaces   pended not so much on the flourish of his
      simply a want of imagination. They have   are articulated by means of the hollowed nests   curves, or the sweep of a housepainter's brush
      been unable to follow and read certain dis-  of imagery and the distinct return; the closing   across a blue nowhere, as on the dumb,
      tinct formal innovations arriving in the early   off of the arabesque.              agonizingly simple expression of illuminated
      and mid-fifties in the work of both men.   De Kooning's move to a different morphology   spaces that hover between material and non-
      Or perhaps I could put it another way: the   was similarly achieved. He, too, was keenly   material. The paint itself is very much there
      formal changes in the course of some twenty   aware of Picasso's transformations, and, at   as a material presence, but the image is some-
      years of serious painting had, for both artists,   least in his early work, followed rather closely   how fighting free of it. In de Kooning it is
      resulted in a reflexive freeness; a true libera-  the cubist spatial sensation. The thin ledge of   always the flight from matter to apparition,
      tion which permitted the kind of veering   space which supports the relief in a cubist   and always apparition brings him back to
      from image to abstraction, and from clearly   painting served de Kooning in, for instance,   matter.
      delineated image to vague mirage, which   those early imaginary portraits of women.   As Pollock spoke of nodes of space and image,
      brought the charges of confusion. To me, it is   Undercutting and stabilizing by means of   and a tundra hollowed by habitations,
      clear that both de Kooning and Pollock had   individual vertical and horizontal axes was   de Kooning spoke of elemental space, as it
      certain strong convictions about the nature of   de Kooning's common practise both in the   could only be dreamed or imagined, but
      their experiences in space, and the nature of   figures of the early 1940s and the celebrated   never traversed, and constantly transforming
      the solids in that space, which they enun-  abstractions  (Attic  or  Excavation)  of the late   on the pre-visible level. The 'form' of his
      ciated definitively in the early 1950s.   1940s. At the same time, he knew the value of   landscape spaces becomes the expression of
      The morphology of Pollock's drawings from   those expressionist distortions Picasso evolved   boundarylessness. Once the landscape is
      the late 1930s was derived from many sources,   in the linear figure drawings of the 1920s, and   peopled, however, de Kooning's new mor-
      but above all, from Picasso's drawings after   incorporated them in his work. In one part of   phology speaks to other senses. Those women
      the analytic cubist phase. When Picasso   a canvas he might consider form in its aca-  he painted last year—they are, as he told
     stretched and twisted the limbs of a figure,   demic definition as the boundary between one   David Sylvester, flesh-coloured women, and
     suggesting strange transformations both in the   surface and another, and in another part, he   why not? Moreover, they display certain
     structure of the figure and its relationship to   might announce his later vision of form as   figurative characteristics in their details that
     its surround, he introduced a mode of draw-  bending, slithering and becoming almost   unavoidably define them as women. There
     ing that was free from cubist rigour. Form in   indeterminate due to its interaction with its   are knees, breasts, high-heeled shoes, eyes, and
      these drawings was not merely a definition of   surround. Even in the romantic early figures,   of course, those perennial mouths that first
      the boundary between one surface and an-  with their smoky softness, de Kooning was   appeared, complete with teeth, in the early
      other, but a summary of the sensations of   beginning to feel that, as Kandinsky said,   1940s.
     surfaces and depths. Form became not       `every form is as sensitive as smoke, the   But they are not amorphous. The welter of
     merely shape, but shape visibly played upon   slightest wind will fundamentally alter it.'   colour, of strokes, of ill-defined planes, of
     by forces so complex they could only be    The dissociation of forms, as in the women of   spots, of dots, densely painted most often, and
     sensed and never analyzed. By talking of sur-  the 1940s with their strangely suspended   filling up the picture plane, are not amor-
     faces as the topologist does—remarking on the   limbs, and their distorted fingers (very much   phous. They do not indicate that de Kooning
     bizarre changes in shapes of surfaces which   in the Matisse manner, by the way) was all in   is no longer able to compose and stabilize
     leave basic properties intact—Picasso opened   keeping with de Kooning's growing feeling   his forms as he did in those crisp early women,
     the way for the vital transformations pursued   for the strangeness (when you really think of   with sharp linear decisions. On the contrary,
     by Pollock at an early age.                it) of the idea of solids depicted on a plane.   these women are de Kooning's enormous dis-
     Pollock's most shocking decision—to paint the   When he begins to mask, to sweep over de-  covery of a new way of perceiving form. Their
     linear abstractions known as the drip paint-  fined forms with erasures and paint smears   hides are examined on the surface, and the
     ings—was well prepared. He had already     (which Pollock also did, in his way), he begins   surface is made to twist, writhe, bend and
     shown in his drawings that he experienced   to discover the laminated spaces that he   splay itself outward. The morphology is the
     spaces and surfaces in this transforming   described in his own black-and-white abstrac-  morphology of the topologist. Nothing has
     manner. For him, what Focillon defined as   tions in the late 1940s. The balletic rhythms   changed in the basic properties (even the
     `the system of the labyrinth' with its different   of the Duco paintings were the last pictorial   teeth and the polished fingernails recur) .What
     planes shifting, and its lines moving at differ-  remarks that could be easily understood be-  has changed is the way de Kooning appre-
     ent speeds, was not a gratuitous choice. It was   fore de Kooning's storm of rebellion in the   hends these fleshed figures as they transpire
     already obvious that his arabesque would   women. They were also the last paintings of   and transform themselves in intimate spaces.
     hollow spaces of a new order, but it was   de Kooning to be admired without reser-   Long before, de Kooning had treated the
     always, still, an arabesque—an emblem of a   vation. Thereafter, his appetite for a new   torso as though it were squashed and flat-
     will to establish a closed, discrete form.   expression of forms and spaces would appear   tened by the forces of nature. Now, this
     It seems to me that the black-and-white paint-   unseemly to many orderly souls.     pummelled torso breathes in and out all over
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69