Page 55 - Studio International - May 1970
P. 55

ment of this idea. And when, during a long
           period of residence in Spain, his old friend
          Joseph Llorens Artigas suggested to him in
           1944 that he should work in ceramics, there
           began a collaboration which has lasted on and
          off ever since and must to a large extent have
          satisfied the ambitions which Miró had ex-
          pressed in 1938—the wish, in other words, to
          find an alternative to easel-painting, and for
          preference one which would allow him direct
          and easy access to a very large public. With
          the ceramic wall for UNESCO in Paris, the
          ceramic mural for Harvard University, the
          big decoration for the University of St Gallen
          in Switzerland and the partnership with Jose
          Luis Sert at the Fondation Maeght in St Paul
          de Vence, Miró began a new career as big-
          scale decorator. [Later this month another
          huge decoration will be inaugurated at Bar-
          celona Airport]. Miró the administrator of his
          own gifts was very much to the fore when these
          commissions came along.
          But Miró is also an artist for whom art is
          something that can be held in the hand.
          Touch matters to him. Earth, stones, grass—
          all have a distinct personality, in his view, and
          one which varies from place to place: almost,
          one could say, from field to field. (When he
          first went to Paris he took with him some grass
          from his native Montroig so that he could
          continue work on  The Farm  with no loss of
          authenticity). Ernest Hemingway said of
          The Farm  that 'It has in it all that you feel
          about Spain when you are there and all that
          you feel when you are away and cannot go
          there'. This remark is obviously more directly
          relevant to  The Farm, with its careful alpha-
          betizing of the Montroig scene, than to the
          recent sculptures; but at the same time there
          is something curiously and irreducibly native
          to that particular scene in Miró's use of found
          objects, over and over again, in the new work.
          There are a great many of these sculptures,
          and they are evidently of the same family. But
          Miró distinguishes three quite different forms
          of patina as between the three firms who cast
          the sculptures. In a letter to Pierre Matisse he
          says, for example, that the pieces from Susse,
          in Paris, have a range of noble patinas that
          runs from black to dark red, with large areas
          of a greenish hue. The pieces cast by Clementi
          have 'a rich and very personal patina, with
          plenty of magic in it'; and as for those cast by
          Parellada their patina has a purity which
          preserves, so Miró says, 'all the strength and
          the expressivity of the sculptures, and preserves
          them in all their pristine wildness and power.
          These pieces in any other form would be a
          dead loss'. Miró is not the kind of senior artist
          who sends a batch of ideas to the founder and
          lets him get on with it.
          As for the sculptures themselves, much could
          be said. One at least of them, the Moon, Sun
          and One Star of 1968, looks back to the series of
          seven Projects for a Monument which Miró made
          in 1954. Jacques Dupin in his book on Miró
          says of these that 'Most of them consist of an
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60