Page 55 - Studio International - October 1970
P. 55

warrants the preservation of the two-dimen-
          sionality. A plastic approach which is incom-
          plete conceptually will destroy the two-
          dimensionality, and being incomplete in
          concept, the creation will be inadequate.'
          It is precisely this abhorrence for the incom-
          plete, the partial, not shared by Pollock, which
          ultimately limits the scope of Hofmann's art.
          For no art experience which is at any parti-
          cular moment true to the artist's vision can by
          definition be complete. As always, Pollock
          had the shrewdness to shake free of this
          noose. With an intelligence altogether more
          nimble than Hofmann's, and with an open
          world of art in view, he saw that the dark
          side of the mind must also find a place in the
          pictorial schema, and that tonal-painting, no
          less impure in its way than Hofmann's 'pure
          colour' structure, could be re-constituted to
          yield fresh vistas for painting. Pollock pro-
          duced a novel flatness by reversing the tradi-
          tional hierarchy both of texture and tonality,
          so that broad markings form the 'background'
          and are seen through microscopic detail, and
          recessive 'spatial' colour is superimposed on
          solid frontal colour. 'Background' and 'fore-
          ground' appear as shadows of one another, a
                                                                                              1
          positive-negative ambivalence. Indeed, some   slogan put about briefly in England in 1961   Jackson Pollock
          of Pollock's most spectacular departures from   by Lawrence Alloway and the Cohens. If   Yellow Islands 1952
                                                                                              Oil on canvas
          traditional modes of perception in painting   there has to be a European movement to   564 x 72 in.
          came both by exaggeration of and by inversion   rival, why not Fauvism, Byzantinism, Schato-  The Tate Gallery, London
          of processes which had formerly been used to   logism! There is, however, a reason for the
          establish pictorial coherence by familiarity to   associations which American painting of the
          the habits of normal looking. His 'all-over'   fifties and sixties seem to forge with Impres-
          form allowed for scrutiny both locally and in   sionism. Apart from important structural and
          depth, as the traditional picture had, only by   formal differences, it is primarily a matter of
          an exaggeration of the amount one was     an affinity of feeling in relation to colour.
          capable of seeing, isolating, and being aware   Matisse referred to two mutually exclusive
          of isolating, the notion of the separate life of   ways of conceiving colour relationships in
          fragments, the notion of the formal arbitrari-  painting, the one considering colour as warm
          ness of contiguities, which philosophers had   or cool, as Impressionism had, the other seek-
          much earlier raised, became for the first time   ing light through the opposition of colours, as
          felt as a fact of experience. While at the same   he developed it in his own work, from the
          time, the traditional canon of graspability of   simultaneous contrast of complementaries,
          the wholeness of an aesthetic experience in a   and as taken up in another form by Op Art.3
          moment of consciousness, the point of aes-  Gauguin's conception of colour harmonies
          thetic realization, was challenged literally,   shared with Impressionism a warm/cool
          not only by the size and complexity of the   approach to colour. His theoretical abhor-
          painting's form, but by the sheer quantity   rence for black was the result of a specific
          and sensual richness of its embodiment.   mode of feeling in relation to colour. It is
          Louis, Noland and Olitski have each in    interesting to compare the mellow autumnal
          different ways taken up these aspects of   exoticism of colour in paintings such as
          Pollock's innovation. It is more than simply a   Picking Fruit, 1899, or  The White Horse, 1898,
          question of size in relation to detail, though it   with a range of paintings by Clyfford Still.
          is true that the smallness of most impressionist   I think one can begin to see from such a com-
          and post-impressionist painting was integral   parison just how much recent American art
          to the desire for a dynamic aesthetic of   relies on a mode of feeling which sees the
          gestalt-realization, which American painting   spectrum as a warm/cool continuum, and
          has abandoned. (Remember Impressionism    which, as a result, withdraws from the abrupt-
          followed a period of large-scale painting in   ness which a dynamic of extreme colour
          France. The dynamics of Pollock's painting   contrasts would bring.
          probably echoes Delacroix if it does that of   American colour painters, with the exception
          any European painter.) Darby Bannard's    of Pollock, see black not as extremely opposed
          recent hymn to the immanent dawn of a great   to white, as it is, for example, in the great
          new school of American colourists to rival   European colourists, Matisse and Leger, but
          Impressionism2   sounds as pathetic as its   as a series of gradations eliding from the
          earlier echo, the Abstract-Impressionism    darkest warm browns through to the darkest
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60