Page 42 - Studio International - December 1971
P. 42

Anthony Caro                              Nocturn strikes the grand manner nevertheless   in reverse. The quadrantal shapes lack
                                               with an astonishing lightness and ease.' Two   containment, and their triangular shaped
     at David                                  verticals, widely separated, are connected by a   supports, while weighing them down, are
                                               bar bent horizontally and running at a slight   themselves weighed down in turn by the heavy
     Mirvish                                   diagonal. One vertical, an elongated vase-shape   ground beams. In short, it is like looking at a
                                               of shaved steel projects a horizontally positioned   sail boat, an impression that the constricted
                                               arm near ground level that curves out, across,   viewing area of the Mirvish sculpture court
                                               and in on the rectilinear. Of an unsmoothed   did not conceal, where it sat as in a large
                                               surface this arm is supported in only one   niche.4
                                               underpart of the bar parallel to the large   A profoundly sculptural mind, Caro's four
                                               transverse bar. The other vertical, an elongated   pictorial pieces in this show are either flawed or
                                               cylinder, projects a sharply curving arm at the   unsuccessful (with the exception of Crown,
                                               same height as the former but rises away from   which sufficiently emphasizes figurative and
                                               the cylinder at a low angle. Also of shaved steel   directional qualities). The least successful work
                                               this arm connects at its axis with an I-beam cut   in this mode was Celeste, consisting of three
                                               so that it sits diagonally on the floor, thereby   verticals in a row, two tall and one short,
                                               seeming to rise out of it. This curving arm ends   connected by a series of circles and
                                               near its neighbour in a low slender cylinder that   semicircles at varying heights (two of the circles
                                               does not rise above the arm itself. Though parts   were from David Smith's collection of metal
                                               of Nocturn (such as the small, springing   and one of them is at ground level outside the
                                               foot-like projection at the base of the   line of verticals; both have rhythmically
                                               vase-cylinder) are superb in themselves, I found   shaped edges). The half of Celeste with the
                                               looking at the whole to be unsatisfying. At   highest elements is both overworked and
                                               heart it is not a complex work and the viewer   terminated too soon. Not only are the angles
                                               tends to see the arms and their supports as   restricted in the pictorial format but the
                                               having been developed in one direction outward   sculpture is closed-in, in a way we do not
                                               from the frame of the two verticals and their   associate with Caro's openness (i.e. closed-in
                                               bar. Curiously though, one never gets a clear   on one side).
                                               impression of the whole sculpture, even given   Canal, a large rusted work (there is blue paint
                                               this uni-directional and pictorial orientation,   on one small area near the ground), is also
                                               so that the viewer is coaxed into looking at   overworked. I have heard it argued that in
                                               parts, at passages, and is never fully allowed to   Canal, Caro is demonstrating the failure of De
                                               look at the sculpture with all its parts working   Stijl composition which too rigorously aligned
                                               together. Nor does it appear that Caro's   itself on the horizontal—vertical axes. But I
                                               introduction of a painterly surface is successful   would suggest that Canal itself works too
                                               in this instance. The advantage of course is that   obviously, or rather tries to, on the diagonal
                                               such a surface receives light with greater   and that its basic relations of up-and-acrosses
                                               variety and interest, but concurrently they can   make these diagonally positioned elements forced,
                                               occasionally look figurative and therefore   whereas the diagonally cut sections verge on
                                               isolated, and therefore unintegrated with the   bombast. Canal has the look of the necessary
                                               whole.                                    mistake about it, the kind of 'mistake' that
                                                 The matte paint texture of Nocturn, by   proves seminal to later, more integrated work.
                                               absorbing light, helps to negate its actual weight   Only Tempus, the rather Smithian Late
                                               (ten men are required to lift it). But as Canal   Afternoon, and Crown achieve the concise,
                                               and Late Afternoon, the only two rusted pieces   poignant expressivity we associate with Caro.
                                               in the show, demonstrate, the negation of   They were also the pieces conceived and realized
                                               weight, the achievement of an illusionistic   in the deepest space (excepting Canal).
                                               weightlessness, is an almost entirely     Atypically, Crown, painted a matte, pastel
                                               compositional feat. The experience of     orange, keeps its elements closely together in
                                               paint-texture and colour (which we should   the almost figurative way that certain of
                                               separate in discussion) are clearly peripheral to   Michael Steiner's upright works do. Also,
                                               this. Lightness, weightlessness, are not the   Crown implies a directed motion of the kind
                                               hallmarks of Caro's originality, they are the   that one associates with Steiner's uprights
                                               more elating aspects of his sculpture. When one   again. The comparison could be taken further
     There were seven pieces in the recent Anthony   becomes aware of the extent to which a highly   but it is Caro's originality that defines the work;
     Caro exhibition at the DAVID MIRVISH GALLERY,   controlled compositional sense affects the   thin linear elements, the very low centre of
     Toronto (June—July), six from 1970, and one,   qualities of his sculpture, taste begins to want   gravity, and of course the paint.
     the splendid After Summer from 1968. It   more complete manifestations of it.2  After   Both Late Afternoon and Tempus have a
     covered a surprisingly broad range of Caro's   Summer is an example.                comparatively reduced number of elements and
     sculpture for the size of the show, and even more   In frontality, the view so well described by   dominating compositional movements, upon
     surprisingly it made him look much better   Jane Harrison Cone,3  one could not be more   which the elements are cast in space. In Late
     than at least three of the pieces actually were.   impressed by such a conception, a conception   Afternoon this movement is an elliptical one.
     Mirvish's is an ideal place to exhibit large art   all the more remarkable for being both   Two semicircles resting on the ground each
     works so that Caro's pieces in the main gallery   pictorial and realized in very deep space at the   support a slender vertical which in turn
     showed to great advantage, especially the light   same time. Moving to the sides, however, the   supports a pair of I-beams, one short and one
     grey Nocturn.                             flaws of After Summer become apparent. All of   long, in a stepped formation. Because the one
       Though less specifically than After Summer,    the relations geared to frontality begin to work    semicircle with support is positioned near the
     254
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47