Page 38 - Studio International - January 1971
P. 38

metal constructions of Picasso and Gonzalez
      from which he derives in material and tech-
      nique. Gonzalez had only a few years before
      his death, during which he was restricted by
      sheer poverty and his own wavering confi-
      dence, in which to develop and enrich the
      possibilities Picasso had presented to him; and
      although he achieved much in that time his
      achievement is essentially backward-looking,
      as if he were remaking an old idiom in a new
      material. Smith matured as an artist in metal
      construction, and had a lifetime in which to
      extend the idiom in its own terms to a range
      and ambition, that in his own work alone gives
      steel a richness and potential equal to or
      greater than that of bronze, wood or stone. But
      in a sense the physical and technical achieve-
       ment, enormous though it is, is irrelevant;
      what matters most is that he kept alive the
      principle of construction in sculpture, which is
       fundamental to all that is most vital in sculp-
       ture now, regardless of material. Smith wrote,
       `Rarely the Grand Conception, but a pre-
       occupation with parts. I start with one part,
       then a unit of parts, until a whole appears . .
       That is to say the part precedes the whole, forms
       it and conditions it. Smith's use of found ele-
       ments which have at once a separate formal
       character and history and are an indissoluble
       part of a larger structure, was and remains an
       invention of great importance, distinguishing
       him from a host of lesser artists who used found
       elements simply for their image quality. From
       the 50s on the distinction between found and
       made, specific and general, stock and designed
       parts is gradually broken down. The invention
       created an external vocabulary of forms and
       objects that renews and transforms his own
       vocabulary of feeling.
       The essential distinction in method between
       Smith and his predecessor is that Smith was
       primarily a welder, a worker in steel, whereas
       Gonzalez was a metal craftsman, a smith, to   times at a point, sometimes along an edge,   13
                                                                                           Gate III (Cubi XXVIII) 1965
       whom welding was one of many possible     sometimes surface to surface. The strength of   Stainless steel
       techniques and steel one of several metals.   the welded joint, which Smith isolated and   14
       Every element in Gonzalez's sculpture is   which is central to his art, defies gravity more   Sentinel III 1957
                                                                                           Steel
       worked;  even the most given of forms are re-  simply and effectively than anything else in   Height 83;1   in.
       vealed on close inspection to have been rolled,   modern sculpture.                 Estate of the Artist
       forged or drawn by hand. By contrast Smith,   The commonest criticism made of Smith's work   15
                                                                                            Tank Totem V 1956
       although he developed and indulged on oc-  is that it is pictorial in form, and over-influenced   Steel
       casion the most various and inventive use of   by painting in both articulation and imagery.   Height 96 in.
                                                                                           Coll. Howard & Jean Lipman, Connecticut
       steel, from the 50s came to realize that steel   It is true that Smith drew heavily at various
                                                                                           16
       worked most simply and powerfully in forms   times on the imagery of contemporaries in   Pablo Picasso
       that are proper to it in industrial and mech-  painting; but his sculpture is rarely—only at its   Bathers 1956
                                                                                           Bronze (from wood)
       anical use; and that the simple tack, the joint   most illustrative and banal—about its imagery.   Max. height 104 in.
       at a smaller point than could be accomplished   Usually the image serves as a vehicle for a
       in any other material, also served to demon-  wholly abstract expression, much as the parti-
       strate the aesthetic strength of the part. Instead   cular function of found parts is relevant only to
       of trying to model, to imitate bronze, Smith   their form-giving potential in a total structure.
       showed what could, and could only be done in   The typical flatness of Smith's sculpture,
       steel. The Cubi series is the climax of this en-   noticeable even in the earliest pieces, has noth-
       deavour; and the components of these sculp-  ing to do with the flatness of painting; it is
       tures represent a wholly new experience of   rather a condition of frontality, in its most econo-
       volume; a volume that, as a closed box in a   mic form, in the material Smith favoured. And
       reflective material, is neither solid nor hollow,   frontality is the common and dominant factor
       light nor heavy; and its mysterious and subtle   in almost all archaic and primitive sculpture.
       nature is enhanced by the articulation some-   Smith's cultural isolation, the fact that as a
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43