Page 16 - Studio International - February 1972
P. 16

Rights of                                 overnight, and (b) the recognition that the   This is not just abhorrent to me personally.
                                                word itself—which became increasingly     It is utterly destructive. It means nothing less
     mobility                                  fashionable in the Sixties and reached its   than self-mutilation. It means prejudging and
                                               apotheosis in 1968 and the art school rebellions   misjudging —in effect, a denial of judgment. It
                                               (Raymond Williams, whom I read with        means either stagnation or a succession of
                                               admiration, called them `useful'; I wish   contradictory commitments. More specifically
                                               someone would tell me what they achieved that   it means a ready conviction, or pretended
                                               isn't outbalanced by the harm they did)—the   conviction, as to what art is and should be. This
                                               word commitment, as pushed at one with     conviction can be essential to the artist. To the
                                               growing frequency, became almost           writer on art (equally to the editor of an art
                                               interchangeable with the word power.       magazine other than a partisan or specialized
                                                  This is a tricky area and I should like to   organ, and equally to anyone else involved in
                                               spell it out a little. Commitment must involve   art) it means the opposite of true commitment
                                               questions of power. In so far as it implies   because it means abandoning art's central
                                               individual energies brought together in a   concerns in order to join the artist on art's
     In 1961 I started to write for Art International.   common cause it means a form of power, and   periphery in order to egg him on and possibly
     About 2 minutes later I found myself pinned   it's a pity the Left didn't get hold of the fasces   even to attempt to lead him by the hand.
     into the corner of a Charing Cross Road pub   as symbol before the others did. In so far as it   I know that some of the best art writing has
     by a friendly artist and a homily on the subject   means an individual's ability to choose an ideal   sprung from this sort of partisanship and
     of power. It was time I realized, he told me   and to cling to it through thick and thin, it   exclusiveness; also most of the worst. Alloway,
     three or four times, that I had power and   again means power : internal power over doubts   for instance, was often brilliant and could also
     this meant making up one's mind how one was   and disappointments, externally an air of power   be directly useful in that he clarified issues and
     going to use it, for what and for whom. So   through sheer cohesion.                 thus helped artists to commit themselves more
     many column-inches meant so much power and   Commitment was hardly ever taken to carry   constructively. For himself he reserved rights
     the more prestigious the place the more   its international, political/social meaning. The   of mobility. On another plane, Ruskin
     powerful the power.                       artists and art students I heard it from were not   produced some of the finest art writing of all
       Of course he was quite right and I am   concerned, any more than the average liberal,   time, and some of the silliest, in the process of
     ashamed how feebly I reacted at the time. I   with the class struggle. For them commitment   relating wayward responses to art and life to
     should like him to know I have thought about   related to the art world and to their work within   profound and true insights into society. But
     it since. But I can't say my thoughts ever   it. They felt no general duty to address their   commitment must either (as in Ruskin's case)
     organised themselves far enough to produce a   activities to a wide public. Their duty appeared   precede the writing on art, or it must come into
     pattern for action.                       as the opposite : to pursue their own individual   existence gradually, through acts of recognition,
       Historically the thing is clear. It was the   (whether borrowed or original) understanding   and not prematurely by an act of choice more
     time of the emergence of a new generation of   of what they were doing in the face of public   likely to relate to ambition than to conviction.
     British artists, intent on a world view of   aversion and ignorance, and also to have a more   An artist is an artist, and that he should shape
     themselves instead of a parochial view, hard   or less deliverable programme (a great period   his life around that basic fact is probably
     working and hard thinking, impatient of the   for statements) and to uphold this firmly.   necessary, certainly not surprising nor in itself
     gentility and the amateurism that still clung to   Confronted by a critic such as John Berger,   of general interest: his work justifies it, not it
     the British art scene like stale scent. Lawrence   whose art commitment is part of his political   his work. A writer on art need not, in the sense
     Alloway was their champion. He had amplified   commitment, they respected his resolute voice   that an artist is an artist, be a writer: he is
     their effect by bringing their divergent talents   but scorned his judgment.        someone who works with and (as he inevitably
     together before the public. I was succeeding   What we might call, then, a professional   feels) for art and there may be many different
     Alloway on Art International: big boots.   commitment seems to me right and possibly   ways for him to do this. The word writing itself
       At the time I was merely confused and could   essential to an artist. I think some of them talk   covers a great range of activities. But he is
     only answer defensively. The word power still   about it too much, and of course the word often   centering his activities on art. There lies, if you
    sounds evilly in my ear, with implications close   precedes any recognition of what should go   insist on one, his kind of commitment, but it is
     to violence : a personality thing, I suppose. But,   with it. But it is inherently apt for an artist to   so open a kind—not merely permitting but
     words apart, I couldn't make out what was being   assert exclusivity, to hold fast to personal and   obliging him to mobility of every sort—that the
     expected of me and my confusion grew worse   theoretical allegiances, to know exactly where   exacting artist would not recognize it. He is
    soon after, when I received another harangue,   in every sense his interests lie and do not lie, in   also concerned with truth, and here he probably
    this time on the subject of commitment.    order not to impede a sort of inward      approaches the artist's position more closely.
       Now commitment is a good word, redolent   concentration. Commitment can easily be a   There's an old story about a bishop who
    of brotherhood, of common efforts against   cover for band-waggoning and camp-following,   asked his publishers why they were so long over
    oppression (against power ?), culturally and   as can the role of being an artist, but that   bringing out his treatise on humility. He got the
    politically left, and related to the beautiful   doesn't alter the artist's right to a creative kind of   answer that the printers had run out of capital
    French word engage and thus to heroes such as   narrowness (at best it is a form of breadth   `I's. I sympathize with him, suspecting that he
    Camus and Sartre (whose disagreement over its   anyway). It is when the artist demands the same   was taking his subject very seriously. The writer
    meaning adds to the attraction). Committed is   sort of commitment from everyone else that he   on art may feel himself concerned with many
    something I should like to be, but it seemed   and I part company.                   truths, or like the artist he may feel he is
    that my background and education were too    For a writer on art this demand meant open   carrying one big truth, but however much he
    fragmented and contradictory to make for   partisanship. One was to 'take a stand'. No one   disguises the fact his activity is deeply personal
    either direct commitment or commitment by   was so comfortably bigoted as to say precisely   and cannot survive the distancing forced by an
    rejection.                                 what affiliation was expected of one but of   imposed, false commitment. To be pushed
       The confusion here arose not from any   course there is only one correct commitment   towards one comes, in the pleasing new
    inbuilt reluctance but from (a) a possibly   and the implication was that one either had to   formulation, under manipulation rather than
    romantic notion that commitment should force   have it or to be committed to the opposite, and   conviviality. q
    itself upon one rather than be assumed    it had to be patent in everything one wrote.   NORBERT LYNTON

    42
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21