Page 27 - Studio International - January 1972
P. 27

among them (24), demonstrate, among many
           other things, a dignity that is a straightforward
           realization of conditions under which structure
           is laid bare to a certain viewpoint (25).
             As these parallels continue into the sixteenth
           and seventeenth centuries some of them may
           reflect remote historical connections, by way of
           the patterns of pioneer anatomical study, which
           have entered deeply into both medicine and art.
           Others may seem closer to the kind of comical
           coincidences which used to fill the picture
           sections of magazines. Even if these comparisons
           are no more than an amusing game, it is none the
           less to the point to enquire why it is possible to
           play this game with only one kind of artist.
           Broadly speaking, it is the succession of artists
           from Masaccio through Raphael, Poussin and
           Ingres to Degas that lend themselves to it. One
           cannot play the game with another kind, the
           kind of which Antonio Pollaiuolo, Michelangelo
           and Rubens are typical, which includes the
           greatest anatomists in art. The positions they
           evolve are useless to the radiographer.
             These affinities evidently point to an attitude
           to the body quite different from the conceptual
           analysis ultimately originating in dissection.
           Similarly, they suggest an order of artistic
           meaning distinct from rhetorical expression
           through physical movement. The other kind of
           physical imagery, which the photographs invite
           us to isolate, has some rather elusive
           characteristics. The normal perspective
           convention is so familiar that we hardly notice
           that cognate processes may also be depicted, so
           that the forms register quite meaningfully
           against a plane within the picture.
             Each of the radiographic photographs
           catches a physical structure in the act of
           surrendering itself to projection on the
           radiographic plate which is included in the
           scene (27, 28). Just similarly, in the picture by
           Ingres at Aix the long arabesque of Thetis is
           projected on to Jupiter's rectangular chest (26).
           No-one supposes that The Battle of Anghiari
           (3o) was fought about the condition of the
           para-nasal sinuses (29). Nevertheless the
           comparison shows that the pose of Leonardo's
           soldier drew force from the way he confronted
           his antagonist in the picture with the
           structures for snarling and biting in their
           clearest and most intimidating aspect.
              The body is both the medium and the theme.
           Many of the great subjects of art are in essence
           physical postures. Related themes cluster
           together around the major aspects of the body.
           The Agony and the Stigmatization (31),
           presentiment (33) and reminiscence, revolve
           around an exposure of structure to the
           penetrating ray which makes the whole body
           vulnerable as if to a supernatural eye. The
           mystic messages of Western art are often visual
           rays with a natural kinship to the figurative
           process.
              This analysis might allow us to re-examine
           some of the outstanding puzzles of art-history.
           Why, for example, did Poussin, in search of a
           pose for the dead Narcissus (36), choose among
                                                                                                                                     '7
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32