Page 59 - Studio International - July August 1972
P. 59

A kind of

          urban furniture

          Theo Crosby



          The problems and pleasures of public sculpture
          are always taken out for an airing every few
          years and at no time has the subject been more
          inappropriate than now. The sculptor's view of
          the subject has gradually changed so that the
          whole issue is now fraught with
          misunderstandings which seem almost
          unresolvable.
             In the architectural sense the problem
          remains much as it was. Sculpture is a kind of
          urban furniture and relates to buildings and
          spaces in such a way as to create scale, to
          manifest a quasi-human presence, to act as an
          accent in a composition, or as a distraction from
          a particularly awkward piece of detailing. It
          really matters very little what the content of
          the work is, only that it should function
          reasonably in its context.
             This view of urban decoration is in effect the
          long time conventional view and every public
          sculpture to date subscribes to it.
             What has changed is the artist's view of his
          role, a result of his continual displacement from
          the public realm, and his acceptance of the
          alternate roles of jester, superstar or academic.
          Sculpture has followed painting into an
          essentially private world (and architecture is
          quite evidently not far behind). The sculptors
          works are now expected to be valued for
          themselves, as themselves, as a product of a
          private sensibility. They are therefore designed
          for the museum rather than for a more public
          context. In the museum a suitably attentive
          attitude is created and the response to the work
          is predictable. The self-selected audience is
          interested in the personality of the artist and
          the helpful attendants ensure that a respectful
          distance is kept from particularly dangerous or
          fragile objects.
            This is entirely not the case with works in a
          public setting.
            In the past the artist used the materials
          common to the building industry: paint, plaster,
          stone, wood, and lead or bronze when it could
          be afforded. The work of art was thus
          technologically integral with the building
          process. Modern technology tends to separate
          out the various components of a building into
          disparate completed elements which can be
          made elsewhere and fitted into the building as
          the work proceeds. In this sense art was very
          soon separated from the construction process by


          (Top)
          Jardin du Carrousel, Palais du
          Louvre, statue by Maillol in foreground
          (Bottom)
          Britannia House (now Lutyens House)
          Finsbury Circus, London
          Architect: Sir Edward Lutyens
                                                                                                                                   45
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64