Page 33 - Studio International - June 1972
P. 33

you are. A device to do that. I wanted it all on
           the surface. They were simply that. That was
           the whole reason for it, to get them really up
           front, to mark with surface wires, and that was
           the canvas surface, and make it an obvious
           point of reference, then to push anything else
           forward that could be in front of that. That's
           all it was. Touch has a residual grid in it, which
           came back into the painting at a certain point.
           It's only in a portion of the painting. It was just
           an attempt to re-establish the surface of the
           painting.
              Drawing is too thin, usually, drawing is to
           get rid of the shit before I can get to the
           painting. Or drawing is looking at the painting
           after. I do a hell of a lot of drawing of the
           painting after I've finished it to know what I've
           got. And usually the more the painting is
           obviously colour, colour chromatics, usually
           the drawing's more tonal. I want to know what
           I've got. I don't want to let it go away until I
           know what I've got. And drawing helps me to
           understand. So I tend to draw a lot after the
           painting, after the painting's finished.
              I don't see it as preparatory to the next
           painting—I see it as an explanation for me of
           what's there at that particular moment. It's
           very often not for the next painting because the
           next painting goes off somewhere else. Because
           I've done that kind of painting and explained
           through drawing that it's going to become a
           certain kind of painting. I tend to go the other
           way then.
              At the moment, I'm much more interested
           in paintings that don't succeed than paintings
           that do. I'm interested in irritants and things
           that don't look right, aren't right and give me a
           bad time. I can paint a good picture, I can paint
           a handsome painting, but I don't want to do
           that.
              I want to paint a very honest painting,
           something that's direct, that's a piece of me,
           whatever I'm into at that time. My
           understanding about what art is and all the
           other things besides. I mean, what screws me at
           the particular moment. I'm very interested in   time I touched the canvas I had real problems   (Above left)
                                                                                                Sometime II 1971
            painting something like a bloody bullet out of   just with touching the canvas. That really can   2.44 x 6.1 m
           the blue, so it comes direct. I'm very interested   hurt sometimes. And a friend of mine, Alan   The artist, by courtesy Reese Palley, New York
            in that. I don't want to fuck it up by painting   Cote came in, and he said something like   (Below left)
           shit, something that produces good handsome   `Wow, the colours are naturalistic'. And I   Untitled 1972
            paintings, or can do. The more you get    hadn't thought of that at the time. Someone   3.05 x 2.44 m
           screwed by this idea of painting the more you   else had to tell me. Because I was trying to   Acrylic on canvas
                                                                                                The artist, by courtesy Nigel Greenwood Inc
            realize that what you've got or what's there for   just put colour down. It was hurting to do it.   (Above)
            you, it's just for you and what's there for   It was blues and browns. Normal old colour, all   Untitled 1972
            anybody else is them. The idea of teaching   the landscape colours, and that. But I wasn't   The artist, by courtesy Nigel Greenwood Inc.
            painting—someone to paint—is irrelevant   putting them down that way. I didn't think I
            really. All you can possibly do is to tell them that   was putting it down that way. So I just did the
            they're okay. It's what they've got, is important.   pictures. I just ploughed into it. So I've got a   bluish, you know there's a lot of blue—it's a
            You may not agree with that.              couple of paintings which I'm taking to Venice.   very naturalistic colour situation. And it's got
              At a time in America I was having a bad   The one painting is a sort of darker version of   a lot of depth in it. It moves, it can run about a
            time, and I thought it was something to do with   the painting I showed here last summer. I felt   mile if you want it to. I've got to choose
            getting into painting. I did a lot of painting   I wanted to have a link between five months   between the other pictures. The other picture
            when I was travelling. I painted and did a lot   before, when I was trying to bridge the gap   can be a red picture, it's a picture that's about
            of notations of landscapes and it was an easy   between those months of travelling and painting   two years old. And a light green picture. When
            transition from the studio back into landscape.   in a studio situation. So that's the painting I'm   I get there I want to see the light. q
            But then coming back to the studio again   going to show. Then I'm showing the very
            became a very difficult transition and every    light one—the painting's a better painting—light   [From a conversation with Tim Hilton.]
                                                                                                                                    247
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38