Page 41 - Studio International - March 1972
P. 41

wasn't really aware of the potential of the
           technique. I was using it then for laying down a
           colour field with as much density as I could
           bring to bear. I didn't appreciate that it had
           this value regarding phenomena : the way it is
           affected by light and the way it can produce a
           confusing surface.
             But having established the technique of
           combing the paint I wanted it to exist in its own
           right. I did one rectangular picture where the
           striations were combed in a single direction
           STUDY (UNTITLED) 1971-72 and another
           which employed a series of directions, which
           again were defined by a numerical division of
           the canvas which was parabolic in nature. The
           starting point was the technique and the
           numerical sequence placed the technique within
           one's oeuvre. For myself I think I've established
           another area of pure formal consideration in
           this piece.
             The 'Art Spectrum' piece (TRACE 1971)
           was my furthest engagement with an
           environment and a specific situation. The
           structure was as retinal as I could make an   image was projected and therefore one didn't   4 RCHOICEJ
                                                                                                JSTATESR 1969
           essentially sculptural object. I wanted to involve   draw stylistically, one drew very generally and   Photograph, aluminium, Transpaseal, Kodatrace
           in painting all the things I had been engaged in,   tonally, more or less without emphasis. It   102 X 204 X SI in.
           but with materials which were expansive and   seemed an absurdity almost, bringing something
           large. I employed reflective surfaces; the   which was engaged in formal, almost ascetic   5  123456...A 1970
                                                                                               (from IMPROVED REPRODUCTIONS)
           framework was based on my studio          values up against the mere imposition of a   Aquatrec on cotton duck, resin, aluminium
           environment—the 300 or 35o slides that were   photograph. But as a result one has achieved an   52 x 100 in.
           shown as part of the piece were views of my   engagement which is rather ambiguous and has a   Richard Feigen Gallery
           studio in Leeds; the basic unit of the piece   strange reference. I thought at first of Vuillard,   6  123456...B 1970
           was the table I always use for benchwork.   how he painted on cardboard and because of the   (from IMPROVED REPRODUCTIONS)
           It was loaded in terms of reference and wasn't   deadening nature about the card things ceased   Resin, fibreglass
                                                                                               42 x 84 x 4 in.
           thought out enough formally. I was consciously   to work spatially. I think one gets a record of   Tate Gallery
           experimenting and I'm very suspicious of getting   incident rather than a description of things
           engaged in that activity. I don't think this   spatial. A sensation of space can only be felt once   7  UNTITLED (STUDY) 1971-72
                                                                                               Crayon, resin, fibreglass
          succeeded ultimately, except that it provided me   the line and the incident is assimilated, because   42  X  102  X  loin.
           with a useful source.                     of the very assertive nature of the surface. There
             The recent work returns to the idea of   is a very positive density to the painting, but at   8  TRACE 1971
                                                                                               Slides, projectors, Kodatrace, wood
           presenting subject matter which is explicit in   the same time it is immaterial.
           itself; in that it's very straight drawing, and by
          simple means disrupting it as far as one possibly
           can whilst making a strict, formal positive
           identity of format, and establishing a format
           which has the property of altering the subject-
           matter sufficiently for it to become
           unrecognizable. Drawings of the 'Spectrum'
           installation piece are introduced into a sheet of
           fibreglass. The pieces are very assertive in terms
           of their form, and what is superimposed is also
           assertive in terms of its imagery. The nature of
           the form is that at a certain point it superimposes
           itself on itself. By folding the drawing in half;
           it being transparent, half will be seen to be
           inverted. Although the drawing is very definite
           it takes some time to grasp what it is about.
             In STUDY (UNTITLED) the colour of the
           ground was dictated by my requirement that it
          should refer to the material of the table in the
           `Spectrum' piece. In that respect it lost its
           identity as paint. For a long time I decided it
           would simply exist in its own abstract right;
           the concept of drawing over a very awkward
          surface and seeing what does register occurred
           to me at a later date. I rather wanted to indulge
           in that drawn thing, that sketched thing. The
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46