Page 50 - Studio International - November 1972
P. 50

he was so nice) with which one considers his   syntheticist Pont-Aven period, which may be   handling of the pleasant impressionist cliché
      paintings. Perhaps there is a moral there. The   conveniently taken as occupying the decade   scene (Monet, Manet, that dreadful early
       Sisleys are okay. There are only six of them.   between 1886 and Gauguin's final hobbling   Munch, Bonnard and so on) where you get
      The seven Cézannes have no specific place in   departure for the South Seas, is introduced   right above a street and look down into it with
       his work and are all brilliant, though not special.   here by a most diplomatic account of the   as risky a tilt (without too much help from
      And there remains Renoir, who takes this   relationship between the master and Emile   either the ironwork of your balcony or the
       opportunity of reminding us of something that   Bernard, an account somewhat muted in its   horizon) as you can manage. And so on. After
      serious people all too easily forget or ignore,   artistic implications because of the author's lack   much of this kind of brilliance the work that
      that he was a fine artist. Renoir came late to   of interest in Gauguin's earlier period, or indeed   slots into what we know of Picasso in his first
       engraving, producing his first work in the   in late nineteenth-century painting as a whole.   phases as a modernist seems to be duller only
      medium in 1889. Some of the ease and confidence   Everything seems to be both self-contained   because it's less surprising, There are things
       about his plates might have to do with the fact   and watered-down, even if we do leap straight   that look useful, for instance; so one can get
       that engraving by that date was considered a   into the tremendous metaphysics of The Vision   further into the Casagemas picture by looking
       more normal activity for an artist than when   after the Sermon and the hideous personal   at these sketches of the funeral. Or so one can
       Manet started to do it. Very like Manet is   politics of the bande a Gauguin, Seguin forced to   trace preliminary ideas for La Vie which might
       Renoir's first essai, a masterly frontispiece to   paint in pure colours at pistol point,   make it seem less vacuous. More quidnunque
       Mallarmé's Pages. Actually it's not like Manet   Schuffenecker abused and bled of his money,   are some early self-portraits and a very early
       himself but like his little vignettes to L' Apres-  de Haan caricatured to the point of torture.   (1900) Mask which the artist calls `the bride of
       Midi d'un Faune, and I guess that Renoir   No flower is so easily blighted as artistic   El Greco'. This provokes some thoughts about
       looked at that especially to get onto the   camaraderie, one feels. There was the stream of   the relationship of portraiture to autodramatic
       Mallarmé wavelength, since they wouldn't have   letters and canvases exchanged between   disguise (which I suppose first comes out fully in
       had more than the odd bonjour to say to each   Brittany and van Gogh in Arles. How many   the 1907 self-portrait, with its van Gogh
       other in the normal course of events. The   mutual portraits there are at this time, how   overtones), but it doesn't really help much. It's
      appropriately aesthetic and lapidary quality of   many pictures inscribed 'A son copain .'!   just interesting. One blue-period picture of
      this etching was not developed, since Renoir   And while van Gogh, away from it all, dreamt   1901 and some drawings seem to prove the
       was more interested in the effects to be gained   of ideal artistic communities, Gauguin was   Munch connection, which Picasso experts have
       by soft-ground etching and drypoint. If   running one, not a utopia but a messy reality   been shy about on the whole. It initially seems
      Manet's graphics seem in bulk as a part of the   where he was the boss. The minor figures of the   reminiscent of Munch's puberty paintings.
       nervous discontinuity of his career, Renoir's fit   school are all here, and are made to look minor   But when you check the dates it seems that
      beautifully and naturally into the more relaxed   indeed, while there is never quite enough good   Picasso was first, and made up this naked girl.
       of his classical moods after the trip to Italy.   argument about the art to demonstrate the   The way she's open and not hunched (rare for
       By their nature they don't get messed around,   major importance of Gauguin himself.   the blue period anyway) pushes one on to think
      like some of the paintings of that period, by too   A persistent leitmotif in many modern art   of the mad beggar figure who often turns up in
       hot colour and a strained monumentality. Thus   movements which balance primitivism and   1904, and more of that unexamined post-rose
      we have works like the Chapeau épinglé, with   sophistication is all that business about   period phase in Picasso's art in which naked
      those plump and summery girls, in hats that one   `painting like a child'. Gauguin and Sérusier   adolescents, with a marvellous repertoire of
       could eat. The point is, however, that it would   not seldom went in for such talk, though they   primordially meaningful gestures, indicate
       not have come out looking like that had not   must have known how different the truth is. On   that they have always known more than any
       Renoir looked very carefully at Raphael. And   those occasions when one is forced to look at a   older spectator. q
      who but Renoir could make Raphael into     load of naive expressionism accompanied by   TIM HILTON
      something so gorgeous ? Such a combination of   crappy Quaker theory, or the dreary
       volupté and connaissance is so unforced and   subservience of time-serving academic   Slick it to me
      masterly that it might not seem to have the   precocity, all sensible people — despite the fact   Polaroid Portraits, Vol 1, published in Germany
      official credentials of great art. But that's what it   that they will be branded as monsters if they say   by hansjorg mayer, Stuttgart, and in London by
      is. The book carries a useful catalogue, and   so — find children's art loathsome. One is   Mathews Miller Dunbar Ltd, and distributed
      Leymarie's informative introduction is    therefore relieved to open Picasso: Birth of a   by Idea Books, l8 Endell Street, London WC2.
      exceptionally well translated, except that there   Genius and find that he never produced any. As   Hardback £2.50.
      should now be a ban on the phrase 'capture the   one would expect, given all those stories of his
      fleeting moment'.                          childhood, producing the marvellous and the   Polaroid Portraits, Richard. Hamilton's first use
        From Renoir's fetes champêtres to the    unexpected like conjuring tricks. This book is   of the book as an art form, consists of a
      saltpetrous explosion at the fateful meeting of   the catalogue of the donation made to the city of   Polaroid self-portrait and thirty-two
       Gauguin and van Gogh seems a journey into a   Barcelona. It consists of a thousand or so   Polaroid photographs of the artist, taken for
      different world, though it happened at the same   works done before he took up permanent   the most part at his own request with a fully
      time. It is surely tight corrivalship which makes   residence in Paris. Only a very few of them have   automatic Polaroid camera bought specially for
      for the remoteness — how different it all was   been published before. The earlier ones, given   the purpose. The photographs are works by
      from the impressionist life at the Café Guerbois,   their competence and brilliance, seem to belong   artists and one poet, all friends or acquaintances
      where Anti-Dreyfusards, boulevardiers, and   to some art-historical limbo, though Señor   of Hamilton's. They form by implication an
      anarchist socialists could shelve their   Cirlot relates them to Spanish art of the   autobiography of the artist over a four-year
      differences in talk. The temptation to relate   eighties and nineties in a more thorough way   period, and imply an aesthetic context in which
      Gauguin's art in terms of his life is irresistible,   than has been done heretofore. Some of the   the artist functions, referring in particular to a
      and perhaps should not be resisted.       things are of such quality that one would realize   span of contemporary art.
      Dr Jaworska, however, is very politely    that a major artist must have painted them,   Besides their references and allusions, the
      interested in the rows, as if he were trying to get   yet could not make any attribution. This is   photographs have palpable and distinct
      all the people concerned to speak to each other   especially so of a Rembrandtesque portrait, of a   qualities and properties. The contributions of,
      again, and his book, though painstaking in   stunningly roughly-brushed nude, of some   for example, Francis Bacon, Cartier-Bresson,
      research and presentation, is short on    `near-abstract' fields and trees, of an El Greco   Jasper Johns, Claes Oldenburg, Brigid Polk,
      stylistic and aesthetic analysis. The     figure, of an outrageously super-confident    Man Ray, James Rosenquist, Dieter Rot,

      198
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55