Page 49 - Studio International - January 1973
P. 49

Dance Movement A c. 1910-I I              Dance Movement D c.                        Dance Movement H c. 1910-I I
        Bronze 12 1/4 x 5 1/2 x 3 in.             Bronze 13 3/4 x 11 1/2 x 4 in.            Bronze 11 x 4 x 5 1/2 in.
        Rodin Museum, Paris                       Rodin Museum, Paris                       Rodin Museum, Paris

        disposition of the figures is dictated not by hard   of a bunched fist; within it arms and legs,   lower legs are simply omitted, and the sculpture
        thought or the constructive process, and in any   knees and shoulders are torn from their original   is detached from a continuous base. It thus
        case, once the sculpture was in the marble no   structural role, their forms and functions   anticipates the great series of partial figures — the
        significant change could take place. Constructed   deliberately confused in a wilful re-assembly of   Torso of a Seated Woman Clasping her Left Leg,
        groupings of existent sculptures from the Gates,   the body as a bundle of lumps and axes. The   the Flying Figure, and Iris, Messenger of the
        for example I am Beautiful and Fugit Amor,   Prodigal Son, though opposite in its openness   Gods, of 189o-91, in which some or all of the
        are more successful, but the individual   and extension, is not so much a kneeling figure   extremities are omitted — in every case the
        components such as the Prodigal Son and the   as a figure in which the lower legs have been   obtrusive and non-structural head — and no
        Crouching Woman, invariably look much better   folded back into the horizontal to support its   specific orientation is prescribed. These
        on their own. With the exception of the    total vertical-diagonal sweep. The sculpture has   fragments are not arbitrarily or wildly expressive,
        Burghers of Calais where the figures are   the character of a single limb, an arm or leg : the   each sculpture is taut and tightly structured, with
        conceived separately and hardly touch, let alone   proportion and structure of the torso confuse it   the arm or arms bonding to the leg to achieve a
        support each other, Rodin's figure groups are   with leg: the legs and arms penetrate and   constructive unity, that can still, by reference
        bad sculptures : it is not that 'he could not   occupy the body: the arms, with the lower legs   to our own body experience, be felt as
        compose', 'had no sense of architecture', etc.   removed, also read as 'legs'. In both figures the   anatomically 'real'. Of all Rodin's sculptures
         but that composition, architecture, structure,   head is reduced to yet another lump; the neck if   those in this group probably appeal more to
        could only 'carry' within the limits of the single   anything assumes a greater expressive role.   contemporary taste, both through their
        figure : duplication of figures cancels the   These two sculptures were made shortly   character as 'objects', by which they were so
         distinct expressive potential of each by defining   after the rhetorical Adam, Eve, and The   influential on Brancusi and the next
        the 'dramatic' too literally, ie in a dramatic   Thinker, and before the naturalistic Belle   generation in Paris, and by their quality of
         `situation', and by sheer visual overstatement.   Héaul-mière and the studies for the Burghers of   abstract structure which relates them to the
          Both the gravity-free conception of the figures   Calais. In these sculptures the poses, though   best sculpture being made today. Yet their
        in the Gates and expressively violent nature of   far from 'natural', were a good deal more   abstractness should be taken with caution, for it
         the subject-matter opened up new          relaxed and static than either the Gates or the   resulted from a desire to express a sense of the
         possibilities for structuring the figure. Up till   Michelangelesque pieces. With the over-life-  figure with increased force : the figure functions
         this point, Rodin's figures had been generally   size studies for the Burghers, and notably with   as the vehicle of abstraction. In intention, in
         upright, self-supporting, the poses derived   the gorilla-like jean D'Aire, Rodin took   feeling, they are possibly no more abstract than
        from classical or Renaissance models, designed   naturalism in terms of the 'life-like' as far as it   the Age of Bronze: the Iris figures in fact
         to display the expressive performance of an   can be taken in sculpture. Like the Age of   represent a later stage in Rodin's exploration of
        essentially Renaissance anatomy. With the   Bronze, it is a tour-de-force, and unrepeatable.   the congruent limits of the figure with the
         Prodigal Son and the Crouching Woman, an    The Torso of Adele was made about the same   sculpture. Although the various stages in this
        entirely new concept of anatomy emerges, in   time as the Prodigal Son (1882), and similarly is   process overlapped — for example, the partial
        which the human body is re-structured in terms   one of the sculptures from the Gates. It shares   figure may have started as early as 1877 with the
        of the posture. Thus the Crouching Woman   the re-structured anatomy in terms of a unified   Walking Man, and there is an intense naturalism
        assumes the compact, closed form, for example,   overall form, this time of a small arch, but the   about several of the Balzac studies from the mid
                                                                                                                                 39
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54