Page 48 - Studio International - March 1973
P. 48

(Below)
                               Box no. 48 1966
                                 Mixed media
                               Coll: Don Judd
                                     (Right)
                          Untitled Box no. 8 1963
                                 Mixed media
                               Coll: Jon Streep























                                               Strange to think of Lucas Samaras as a process,   dada and surrealist treasury. But by now there
                                       A       but that is how he seems to think of himself.   are enough emblems of Samaras's educated
                                               `What are you ?' he asks himself in an auto-
              home-made                       interview. 'Inwardly I am an erotic sadness,   obsessions to persuade us that he is the real
                                                                                         thing. The Whitney Museum's retrospective
                        process               outwardly I am a home-made process for     with its horde of more than 375 objects leaves
                                                                                         no doubt. Samaras belongs to no school, but
                                              unravelling meanings.' After almost fifteen
                                    for       years of observing this process, or the process's   only to that tantalizing family in the history of
                                                                                        art in which the articulation of an obsession is
                                              products, I am quite convinced that Samaras's
               unravelling                    own assessment of what he is is often the best.   the meaning of a life's work.
                                                                                          I don't mean that Samaras has an obsession
                                              The forthgiving that characterizes Samaras's
                   meanings                   whole life (which he says, and I believe him, is   which could be paraphrased with Freudian or
                                                                                        art historical allusion. Rather, he is obsessive by
                                              his art) is a giving forth of everything that can
                                              possibly be pitched into the surround, and that   nature, and all the modes he has explored bring
                                              naturally includes words. Not being Samaras, I   him no closer to his end. There is nothing in the
                                              and quite a few other people have chosen other   world that could assuage his hunger for
                           Dore Ashton        words to circumscribe the process. The longer I   unravelling meanings. Hunger. Not only is the
                                              follow Samaras's trail of coloured wools into his   voraciousness of his appetite one of the key
                                              maze, the more convinced I am that what he is is   impressions such an exhibition offers; it is
                                              an educated obsession.                    perhaps the key of his personality. The word
                                                The fact is, he is educated. His Greek   hunger itself appears all the time in his writings,
                                              childhood filled him up with the modern   and on a more obvious level, much of his work is
                                              educated Greek's incurable hate-love of the lost   about the processes inspired by hunger :
                                              glory that was Greece. He was educated to   lovemaking or plain eating. One of his earliest
                                              myths, not only the heroic myths of antiquity,   groups of 'transformations' utilize dinner
                                              but the somewhat less elating myths concerning   plates, eating utensils and tumblers in a classic
                                              the Turks and even the Germans and the    surreal treatment combining the familiar with
                                              Communists during the Second World War.    the unthinkable. Samaras says again and again
                                              In his copious autobiographical notes he   in his sub-language of artifacts that no hunger
                                              constantly harks back to Kastoria, his myth-past,   can ever be satisfied, whether hunger for the
                                              his myth-path. But then again, in a much more   raw and the cooked, or hunger for knowledge
                                              mundane context, he was educated in America,   (those books that cannot be opened; or that
                                              in the normal liberal arts college way first, and   bristle with caveats in the form of razors and
                                              later, in the advanced contexts of Meyer   pins.)
                                              Schapiro's courses in art history. His education   If I say we can know a man by his obsessions,
                                              for being an artist, then, was more or less   I am going too far. What can be discussed to
                                              conventional.                              some extent is the way obsessiveness finds its
                                                In view of his insistence, sometimes     historical milieu. Here I find in the Samaras
                                              coquettish, on the home-madeness of his self;   geneology not only the obvious Freudian
                                              and in the light of his perpetual interventions   circumstances of his epoch, but a tradition that
                                              via the word, one might have been misled into   comes, almost without the intrusion of
                                              believing that Samaras is not a true obsédé but a   Surrealism, straight from Rimbaud, and
                                              willed one who happened to mature under the   certainly from the nineteenth century in general.
                                              aegis of Allan Kaprow, George Segal and the   Where the surrealist sometimes flirted with the
                                              Rutgers crowd when they were dipping into the    grotesque, he was usually too self-conscious to
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53