Page 17 - Studio Internatinal - October 1974
P. 17

democratization after the stages of political,   In Ghent, since 1957, the Association of the   (From top to bottom)
         social, economic and educative democratization.'   Museum of Contemporary Art has fought for a   Action against the project for a Museum of Fine Arts
                                                                                              in Brussels
         'The notion of culture must be purified of   museum of contemporary art and is meanwhile
                                                                                              Photo: Jacques Evrard
        certain bourgeois stigma. Culture is not   buying works. It has just bought a great work
                                                                                              Commemmorative stone erected in 1970 at Antwerp
        something belonging to a limited elite, or the   by Carl Andre, exhibited in Brussels. Its latest   where the Museum of Modern Art is supposedly being
         privilege of the happy few. Culture is the   acquisitions are works by Broodthaers, Christo,   built. The foundation stones are yet to be laid.
        heritage of the whole community and it is   Dibbets, Fulton, Gilbert and George,      Renovated hall at the Musee des Beaux-Arts, Brussels
        sometimes a good idea to make the distinction   Panamarenko and Van Elk. So if the museum
        between so-called culture with a capital C and   of contemporary art is ever built in Ghent, it
        the other kind. I believe the latter to be more   will have the only collection of international
        important because it is the culture of daily   contemporary art in Belgian museums and this
        life, of the living environment, of food, of   will be thanks to a private association.
        human relationships and the eternal reply to   The Palais de Beaux-Arts in Brussels, with
        the eternal provocation of a rapidly changing   its concert and exhibition halls and stages, the
        community, in which all kinds of relationships   biggest exhibition centre of the country, is also
        are constantly taking on a new nature.' (1972)   a private institution, though it exists because of
        The Minister listed as priorities the following:   State aid. The 'Internationaal Cultureel
        educational guidance for young workers,    Centrum' created several years ago by the
        effective aid to socio-cultural organizations and   Flemish Minister of Culture, in the old Palais
        certain forgotten groups, like the old, the   Royal in Antwerp, is well known for its
        handicapped, foreigners etc., then followed the   dynamism and its avant-garde exhibitions. The
        public libraries, the protection of the    Palais de Beaux-Arts in Charleroi follows a
        environment, sport and recreation. He also   policy of exhibiting more classical modern art.
        spoke of the museums, but he and his          After the war and encouraged by the
        sociologists forgot them, in their ardent new   APIAW, Liege became a very active centre,
        belief that the cultural centres would be able to   but has not maintained its reputation, despite
        democratize culture, and in putting this belief   the fact that several galleries and important
        into practice. They thus accentuate the crisis of   artists like Charlier want to breathe new life
        the museums, seen as bourgeois and elitist,   into it. There has been achievement of great
        which have remained static in Belgium, making   quality in 1974: the opening of new rooms in
        no response to the demands of a profoundly   the old Brussels art museum. Renovation of
        changing society.                          other rooms has been promised. The distressing
           Apart from the Middelheim in Antwerp, an   situation of the museums of modern art can be
        open-air sculpture museum, there is not a single   countered by the interest and enthusiasm of
        independent art museum with a worthwhile   Belgian collectors for today's art. The era of the
        collection of national and international modern   four great men: Ph. Dotremont, F. Graindorge,
        art. The majority of museums are mixed, that   J.B. Urvater and G. Van Geluwe is past. With
        is they have collections of classical and modern   the exception of R. Vanthournout's group, few
        art (Antwerp, Bruges, Ghent, Liege). Their   collections have historical ambitions as yet. The
                                                   collections which are not hidden are less
        modern collection is most often national, or
                                                   extensive and very often prefer group works of
        favouring national art. Every one of them lacks
                                                   a recent period; for example B. Barman,
        finance. Almost all are housed in old buildings.
        In addition, run-away inflation does not make   A. Goeminne, P. Janlet, M. Lejeune, R. Matthys,
        purchasing any easier. In the long run, we even   C. Van den Bosch. They specialize: H. Peeters in
        wonder who will still be able to buy a whole   pop-art and some hyperrealists, Daled and
        category of contemporary works, apart from   Herbert in conceptual art, L. Bogaert in
        groups of speculators. Certain museums buy an   constructive art and Permeke, A. Taevernier in
        international work from time to time, but too   drawings and graphic art, or are quite simply
        often lack daring.                         eclectic.
          Only Brussels has an international collection,   The greatest number of collections is found
        but since 1958, it has been awaiting the long   in Brussels, but for some years, Flanders has had
        promised construction of a modern art museum,   a possibly equal number of collections. Certain
        and remains in store or in a few provisional   banks must also be listed among the collectors:
        exhibition rooms. It does not seem as if the   Paribas for national art and editions of luxury
        plan for this museum is going to emerge from   art books, Lambert for international art. In both.
        the administrative maze. Moreover, there is a   cases, the collection began for reasons which
        lot of opposition to it, because of the site and   have no direct connection with financial or
        because it is not integrated into the urban   investment concerns. At Paribas, it was
        scheme as some see it.                     Naessens who was responsible for the
          On 12 September 1970 in Antwerp, the     artistic activity, because of his love for art and
        authorities laid a commemorative stone on the   Flemish culture, and a desire to promote this
        site 'where the museum of contemporary art,   art. At Lambert, it was an established feature
        designed by the architect Le Corbusier, will be   and a family tradition. In recent years, other
        built'. While we wait for the first stone of the   financial institutions have organized exhibitions,
        museum to be laid, the monument is losing   or bought the works of Belgian artists. It's the
        letters; so it will soon be an unknown     collectors who, generously and, why not, with a
        monument to an unknown museum.             touch of vanity, do the public-relations work for

                                                                                                                                115
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22