Page 58 - Studio International - November December 1975
P. 58

only that, it loses much of its power. If it aspires to the   of ambivalence. His works are mechanisms in which
          condition of mathematics, it will, necessarily, lapse into   energy is allowed to flow between two poles, two sides
          tautology and impotence. If it confines itself solely to a   of a boundary, inside/outside, towards/away from,
          critical examination of the products of the dominant   projection/introjection, signature/unsigning, Western/
          ideology, producing isolated 'semiological' unveilings in   reversal. Like puns, they are mechanisms by which one
          the manner of the earlier Barthes, then there is a risk of   can say two contradictory things at once : they are a
          another kind of foreclosure. For if language is so   means of avoiding limitation, confinement, definition,
          manipulated as to become a perfect instrument of     substantification, finality. They are desire-machines2  in
          analysis, if our statement exhausts itself, then it becomes   which desire may oscillate endlessly between poles or
          repressive itself. Only if in speaking through language we   circulate continuously around loops. To the 'art
          allow language to speak through us, to produce a speech   consumer' Dye's 'negative capability' may seem simply
          that is inexhaustible to analysis and open to the action of   negative. For others, it may be a 'gala scienza' —for
          desire, will we avoid the trap of fighting the enemy with   Nietzsche was notable in preferring the smile of the
          weapons of its own choosing. For, like all forms of human   seated Buddha to the agonized grimace of the
          expression, art is an accommodation, endlessly       outstretched Christ (and its 'humanist' derivatives).
          renegotiated, between desire and the institutions and   David Dye's work operates a 'subversion of the subject'3
          codes of a culture : like life itself, it contains elements,   that bears witness to the demise of 'man' as an object
          inextricably mixed, of Eros and Thanatos. When       of conceptual concern.4
          negotiations break down, one has either academicism or
          madness. To simplify a complicated matter, what
          deflected Barthes' interest away from semiology (the
          critical analysis of the work of the collaborators) back to
          literature, or 'writing', as he prefers to call it, was the
          encounter with Lacan1. The operations of desire, through
          the languages of art, came to seem of more radical import.
          To require that an artist should be totally conscious of
          what he is doing is to castrate desire.
            Dye's work avoids both dangers. Though the use of
          language in both ways has presented a challenge, even,
          sometimes, a temptation, he has been true to his     1 My translation of two books by Jacques Lacan1., Ecrits: a selection
                                                               (Tavistock) and Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis
          'instinct' (desire). In his work, language has never been
                                                               1 Hogarth) will be published next spring.
          more than a subsidiary, instrumental element. Sensing
          that, through him, desire could not communicate in words,   2   See Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, L'Anti-Oedipe. A translation of
                                                               this most fundamental of recent works will be published by Calder and
          he has refrained from using words against his desire. His
                                                               Boyars in 1976.
          'concepts', even when translatable into words, have been
          'spatial', 'sculptural' concepts. They constitute a   The phrase is Lacan's.
          mechanism that produces signification, but a signification   4See my translation of Michel Foucault's The Order of Things,
          that is inexhaustible to analysis. They have the full weight    Tavistock, 1970.






































                       'FILMY TALES' resisted writing.
                       Fugitive phrases abandoned the sequence and found their way on to cards.
                       These were sent uncovered to various film friends, with brief directions towards risky
                       situations. 'Lose this', 'To be spliced', 'Leave outside at full moon' etc.
                       Not all cards returned. Nineteen survived, drastically altered by the vagaries of the post,
                       the elements and assertive handling by film-makers.
                       Each card has a tale to tell, some evidenced by their condition, some by witnesses.
                       One lost a corner to a runaway child who grabbed it unsuccessfully.
                       One acquired a soundtrack.
                       One gathered dust on a breakfast table and is soft with damp.
                       One stayed at home, hiding in the backyard under white rose petals, now very frail.
          210
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63