Page 99 - Studio International - November December 1975
P. 99

has proven in this film (as illusionistic as it may be) to be   The structuring of the film programmes was excellent;
         ¾ solid, totally competent, strong-headed film director. No   everything was done to make relations between film,
        other film director of interest has emerged within reach   seminar, film, clear. The seminars were given by people
        of her sensibility, which in this case includes to no small   mostly interested in (or captured by) literary analysis, so
        degree the management of ¾ 15 woman-and-man crew,     much of the specific talk on specific films was ¾ sign of
        which is to say this is ¾ film produced under film-  the immense difficulties that the Screen editors have
        industrial conditions and brought to fruition. In that   when dealing with the  filmic, and the politics of that. But
        sense, Chantal Ackerman is the first interesting film   the audience, the co-operators in the seminars, were
        director in recent years. She is not within the avant-garde   people who didn't just blithely listen, and thus I think the
        tradition ; it is ¾ misreading to assume that the pure   seminars were of some use. In any case, literarily inclined
        formalist perfection of the consistent non-diagonals,   'or not, it was not the unthought attitude that is dominant
        those constant frontal shots, focus 'often located about .1   in critical work on film, and historical contextualizing of
        from the lens, 3 from deep space's end') is in some way   such.
        breaking with traditional narrative concerns. But within   Michael Snow showed his four and ¾ half hour
        the tradition of the narrative, within the tradition of the   Rameau's Nephew, and two films by Yvonne Rainer were
        storyline film, within the tradition of formal elaboration of   screened. Snow seems to be somewhat confused lately
        those characterological ends (the style bolstering the   (I refer to his films), but for someone with Wavelength,
        psychological 'meanings' spun out by the filmscript),   Back and Forth and Central Region in their past, ¾ five
        Ackerman is ¾ perfectionist. She has, it seems to me,   hour lapse needn't be seen as definitive. Why Yvonne
        made ¾ film totally adequate  to her aims ; it is, in that   Rainer's films were shown at all I haven't been able to
        sense, ¾ totally realized film, and that is why she is, as so   fathom. No doubt the push Artforum gave her is to blame
        few are, ¾ good director. The mundaneness of the story   (two specially long articles, one cover).
        needn't be broached here in depth. Suffice to say that it   I have said, so far, nothing about the second week. I
        is about ¾ woman in the home, doing rituals, minutely   wasn't there. The first week ended with Berwick Street
        observed, never ¾ moment of tedium in the watching   Collective showing their Night Cleaners. I missed the
        though many in the doing ; housework is exposed for the   last seminar, which dealt with it.
        first hour, for the rigorous and vigorous labour that it is,   Middle of the first week an evening with Jean Marie
        and the time consumption that each act takes is      Straub and Danielle Huillet, ¾ two and ¾ half hour public
        specifically asserted, in spite of the cutting (the   question/answer time, which was solid. People asked
        observance is anything but Warholian). Delphine Seyrig,   questions after having seen the works, the answers were
        being ¾ superb actress, makes the film. As does Babette   long and precise : mainly by Jean Marie Straub about
        Mangoldte, who is a superb camerawoman (and lighting-  the background, history, difficulties in making the films,
        camerawoman as well ; sets lit like this have not been seen   expositions of the precise technical work on Moses and
        for three decades in Hollywood, they just don't have the   Aaron (Huillet), the production of the sound ; the
        training, it seems). The film though is not ¾ rigorous (albeit   relationship between Kandinsky at the Bauhaus and
        illusionistic) analysis of the labour of the housewife under   Schönberg, and the question of antisemitism in their
        capitalism ; it is not ¾ description of causal relations ; it is   relations ; the reasons for black leader in the Schonberg
        not ¾ presentation of psycho/social/etc interactions of   film ; why ¾ cat played an important part; car trip
        frustration. What it is, unfortunately, is ¾ look at the   through Rome, elaborately choreographed for History
        symptoms, ¾ condescension, the traditional (at best)   Lesson, how, why, the function in terms of history, in
        liberal look at anality ('magically produced') in the woman   terms of Rome, in terms of politics ; the dedication to one
        at home. In that sense, (and that is the base, and the main   of the Baader-Meinhof group, the troubles with German
        interest of the film,) Jeanne Dielman is ¾ profoundly   TV ; the troubles with Brecht's son (¾ publisher) ; the
        reactionary film. (Certain readings would help : Jean   concepts (Hegelian and other )in Moses and Aaron ;
        Gardiner, 'Women's Domestic Labour'. New Left Review   discourse on monotheism ; who are your favourite
        86 ; The Power of Women and the Subversion of the    film-makers, etc. The 2½ hours were valuable, filled, and
        Community, Selma James and Mariarosa Dalla Costa ;   free from trivia. Stephen Heath did the (virtually
        the extremely important The Main Enemy, by Christine   simultaneous) translating into English, quickly,
        Aubry (the two latter from Feminist Books, P.O. Box HP   precisely (by all accounts). Dannielle Huillet got into
        51, Leeds, or Red Books, 97 Caledonian Road, London,   speaking (reluctantly) mainly about exact technical
        N1) ; and 'The Housewife and Her Labour Under        details ; Jean Marie Straub spoke most of the time. They
        Capitalism'. Wally Secombe, NLR 83).                 seem to work together in some rough 50/50 way, but it
          There were Brecht seminars every morning of the first   wasn't easy to discern the parameters, or where the lines
        week : films were programmed to connect to the following   are drawn and by whom. Half of the discussion is
        day's seminar. Thus one could re-see Godard's Two or   appearing in Journal of the Royal College of Art, Jan.
        Three Things I Know About Her (in super wide screen),   1976.
        and the Godard/Gorin misfortune (95% Gorin, 5%         Robbe-Grillet didn't show up. But no one was
        Godard, according to JLG) Tout Va Bien ;  Lang's     interested anyway, and the films of his shown were too
        hilariously silly B-picture Hangmen Also Die (scenario   dreadful to consider. I couldn't find anyone who
        by Brecht), and the Pabst Threepenny Opera. The      managed to justify his latest adolescent Playboy sex-
        seminars on Brecht, given by members of Screen       fantasies, in all their prurience and soft core
        magazine, were attended by ¾ solid group of about 60   sweetness, though virtually everyone recognizably
        diehards, who listened well, came on time at 9.30 each   interested in film in London was at Edinburgh.
        morning, and proved that there need not be the general
        festival ambience of 24-hour drunkenness. The pleasure
        involved in going to ¾ two-hour seminar, then sitting
        around another hour over free coffee and rolls (with   Space Open Studios
        butter !), then moseying back to film house and lunch
        before the afternoon shows, was ¾ rare one. During all this   13 London Studio Shows
        one noticed that the natives of Edinburgh are the    22 September-12 October
        friendliest people anywhere, and that (any myths about
        the Scots to the contrary) even bus drivers on public
        transport who god knows have no reason to be nice to   Reviewed by Stephen Carter
        anyone, let alone tourists with American accents, were
        utterly friendly. It ain't no Cannes or Berlin or New York.   If there can be little doubt about the need for an
        Thankfully.                                          organization like Space, neither can there be much doubt
          There desperately needs to be an area for eating/   about the value, at least to the artist, of showing work
        drinking, such as press and film-makers had, for the   publicly from time to time. The fact that little of the work
        public, who are forced to wander aimlessly (and often   deserved serious attention is only to be expected and in no
        alone) between screenings (except at the seminar     way reflects badly on Space or the notion of mounting
        place). Interaction with the public is ¾ necessity.   this ambitious series of studio openings. There were no
                                                                                                           251
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104