Page 37 - Studio International - January 1966
P. 37

Henry Moore
        Nude seated  1930
        Pencil and water
        14 x 16 in.
        By courtesy of Mercury Gallery











        Opposite
        Auguste Rodin
        Dancer  c. 1900-2
        Pencil and wash
        14 3/8 x 10 3/4 in.
        By courtesy of
        Roland, Browse 8- Delbanco




































                                the spirit ran out into the forms of his sculpture. In their   of hills and valleys, rocks and boulders, and even the
                                immense consistency, their supreme single-minded-  textures of earth, bark, rock and stone. Moore's debt
                                ness, and their crystal relationship to his sculpture,   in this respect to the rugged aspect of the Yorkshire
                                the drawings of Rodin are perhaps the most perfect   moorland, the soil from which the substance of his own
                                illustration of my thesis.                         life emerges, is apparent in his drawings, which have
                                  No less consistent and single-minded are the drawings   always provided the starting-point for the directions
                                of Henry Moore. They too are the perfect complement   and ideas of his sculpture. They are the foundation
                                to his sculpture. But whereas Rodin accepted the forms   upon which all his sculptural concepts are based and
                                of life as they presented themselves to his eye—'There   reveal an unparalleled consistency and single-
                                is no recipe for improving nature' he once said—   mindedness—from the life drawings of his years at the
                                 Moore has always striven to evolve a scheme of    Royal College of Art and immediately afterwards, right
                                arbitrary images—one that will best express his need to   through to the near abstract (though always anthropo-
                                 neutralise the concept of the human being as      morphic) forms of the 1960's. A central problem has
                                'individual', while retaining the idea of an impersonal,   been the artist's need to reduce, in particular, the
                                yet always anthropomorphic, monumentality. In his art   'personality' of the face: focal point of the rapacious
                                this modified, anthropomorphic image is conceived   and devouring egotisms of man. Where Bacon, for
                                 primarily as an archetypal figure in some respects   example, uses the face as a vital and crucial element in
                                 primitive—Moore acknowledges his debt to primitive   his scheme and pattern of communication (the eyes
                                art forms, those of Mexico especially—stylistic, and   and mouth especially), Moore has always sought to
                                 loaded with a profound symbolistic charge. Thus for   render it as anonymous and featureless. He has
                                 Moore, any concept of the dignity of man is best   resolved the problem in a variety of ingenious ways,
                                 expressed by a stylistic image which emerges and   from the creation of primitive style symbolisation to
                                 evolves from the guts of nature. Hence the nature of his   the establishment of such unique metaphors as the
                                formology, which is always an extension of landscape—   flattened head which rises almost unwillingly from the
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42