Page 42 - Studio International - March 1966
P. 42

An evolution illuminated



                             New York Commentary by Dore Ashton

                             In his essay on Rembrandt, Marcel Proust reminded us   Guston began formulating the paradoxes on which his
                             that the 'end for which artists are made is not fame, but   recent painting is based. Here, the rusty shapes, like
                             the complete statement of this or that conception.'   phantom cupolas, live tenuously in a turbid atmosphere.
                              He pointed out that Rembrandt's mature manner  They are formed in a coalescence of long strokes that
                             consisted in an obsessive exertion to reach a complete   can be read either abstractly, or as concrete, space-
                             statement of the golden light that had enveloped his   displacing objects. To emphasize the paradox, Guston
                             sitters, to 'convey it as a whole, without further care for   hangs the coloured image like a curtain on his white
                             beauty or any other outward verity, but sacrificing   canvas, now and then allowing some of the under-
                             everything to this, halting himself, going over it again   painting to flow out toward the edge so that the painted
                             so that nothing of it should escape, feeling that this is  structure comes forward in an illusion of concreteness
                             the one thing that mattered.'                     at one moment, and hangs mute as a testimony to the
                              Proust recognized what must be apparent to anyone   reality of the flatness of canvas at another.
                             who has immersed himself in the mature work of a    A year or two later, the strands congeal, forming
                             great master: that the paintings form a continuum so   suggestive shapes that can never be quite identified
                             that one picture does not differ so greatly from the next,   although they look familiar. These shapes are generally
                             but merely deepens a stated obsessive search.     composed of sooty black, broad strokes that pick up
                              I mention this because the large exhibition of Philip   and amplify movements and shapes in the silver-grey
                             Guston's recent paintings and drawings at the Jewish   atmosphere in which they are embedded. A few thin
                             Museum has occasioned considerable debate. Guston   floes of rose or sky-blue seep from beneath the
                             is recognized as a major painter, grudgingly admired   impastos recalling the deep concern with paradox that
                             for his obvious painterly skill, but criticized for his   moves the artist.
                             ongoing obsessions. Those who have become           By late 1964, Guston had all but eliminated colour,
                             accustomed to scanning paintings at a glance find it   preferring to render his image in brilliant, often harsh
                             difficult to enter the sludgy, grey world Guston offers   and glinty greys, blacks and whites. He had reduced
     Below
     Philip Guston           with its events so closely related from canvas to canvas.   the dense thing-like shapes to a major and one or two
     Air II  1965             Yet, in the high, hard light of Guston's most recent   minor agents. Knifelike licks of white shoot out from
     Oil on canvas
     69 x 78 in.             paintings, his evolution is illuminated. His universe of   within the trellis of strokes. The air is no longer turbid,
                             eternal beginnings takes a firm shape. It only wants   but sharp like Alpine air.
     Right
     Drawing No. 18  1965    concentrated attention to reveal itself.            In the clarity of stroke, sometimes five inches wide,
     19 1/4 x 25 in.          The exhibition begins with work from around 1960   there is always a concrete reference. Each stroke,
                             and 1961 when, as in  Close-Up Ill  and  The Tale,   indeed, is like a thing, and each thing moves either in
     Photos: Eric Pollitzer
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47