Page 31 - Studio International - November 1966
P. 31

Mr H. S. Ede had acquired directly from Wallis during  to the quality of Wallis's best work: it also suggested the
                                 the 1930's, while Mr Ede was an Assistant at the Tate  most unusual situation of a painter of some importance
                                 Gallery. Wallis would send him rolls of them by post,  whose public reputation, such as it was, rested almost
                                 heavily enmeshed with string and knots, and Ede would  entirely upon second-best work. And of what other
                                 pick out the best and return the others with a small  figure in twentieth-century English art could that
                                 cheque. Ede was one of only '3 or 4 that haves all  honestly be said ? In the case of Wallis this was a parti-
                                 i do', as Wallis would frequently tell him. Looking at  cularly unfortunate state of affairs since, being a lonely
                                 Ede's collection it was immediately clear that at least  old man with nothing else to do but paint, inevitably he
                                 one-third of the paintings were of an incomparably  overproduced. He often did as many as three or four
                                 higher standard than those which had hitherto reached  pictures in a day; and I estimate that in all he must have
                                 the London galleries and auction-rooms. And it was not  painted several thousand in seventeen years. I have seen
                                 hard to see why this was so. The few large private col- at least one thousand of those that have survived; yet
                                lections of Wallis's paintings, hand-picked with the  barely one hundred of these are paintings of any out-
                                greatest care during the artist's lifetime, still remained  standing merit.
                                 (like Ede's) substantially intact, or at least (as in the case   So much, then, for the reasons for writing about Wallis
                                 of Ben Nicholson's collection) within a circle of family  at all. After that it became largely a matter of systemati-
                                 and friends. With very few exceptions, for example a few  cally visiting the main private collections, and of tracing
                                 presented to the Tate Gallery, the paintings which had  the surprising number of important pictures which had
                                 reached a wider public were 'weed-outs' from these  been given away, lent, lost, borrowed, or were to be
     ▪  St lves Harbour with  seine   collections, or else pictures which that handful of pre- found 'somewhere in one of those trunks in the attic'.
        nets and Godrevy Lighthouse
        (Collection: Henry Moore,   war collectors had rejected as inferior.        When he sees so many paintings by one man in a period
     •   O.M.)                    Not only, then, did this visit to Cambridge wake me   of less than a year, a writer becomes increasingly aware of
                                                                                   those traits in a man's work, often by no means the most
                                                                                   obvious ones, which mark out his personality as an artist
                                                                                   and provide the real clues to his aims and to his imagina-
                                                                                   tion. To give one example: a feature of Wallis's work
                                                                                   which, I came to realize, recurred surprisingly often, was
                                                                                   the way in which he would compose a landscape as if it
                                                                                   were a kind of map—a composite record of towns, light-
                                                                                   houses, harbours, and other landmarks of West Cornwall
                                                                                   (which he knew and wished to set down), seen as if from
                                                                                   the air. These paintings were intended to be factual
                                                                                   records. What counted for him were the facts, not a
                                                                                   photographic likeness. So he would distort his images
                                                                                   according to what interested him, and bend and cram
                                                                                   them into whatever shape of paper or board he was
                                                                                   working on, invariably leaving out whole stretches of
                                                                                   coastline in his determination to  get in everything that
                                                                                   really mattered.
                                                                                    A St Ives general practitioner, Dr Roger Slack, has in
                                                                                   recent years been recording, on tape, descriptions of Wallis
                                                                                   by elderly patients who knew him; and one of these has
                                                                                   described how on fine days Wallis would put his paintings
                                                                                   outside his cottage in Back Road West, St Ives, and
                                                                                   explain to passers-by what they were, details of sails and
                                                                                   'what every part was used for—and the ropes'. It was his
                                                                                   way of being an old fisherman airing his knowledge; and
                                                                                   this account serves to emphasize the entirely literal,
                                                                                   factual approach which Wallis adopted in his work. He

        Four Ships leaving harbour:
        characteristically painted on
        a strip of discarded board,
        untrimmed. (Collection:
        Miss Kate Nicholson.)











                                                                                                                                 237
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36