Page 55 - Studio International - September 1967
P. 55

everything that would otherwise look separate and   three vertical elements no more than four feet high,   everything else moves, and takes its own part in
            frontal move and fuse.                   the two pieces strike the heroic, grand-manner note   the challenge to the force of gravity.
            The play of light against heavy is interwoven,   even more resonantly than the best of Caro's large   Applied colour is another of the means to weight-
            fugally, with the play of open against closed, and   English sculptures do. I say more resonantly,   lessness in Caro's art, as Michael Fried, again,
            of irregular against regular. Or at least this is so in   because less expectedly, less in terms of the   points out. It acts—especially in the high-keyed
            most of the steel sculpture that Caro did at home   historic connotations of the grand manner. (Though   off-shades that Caro favours—to deprive metal
            in England. Five of the seven pieces he made in   Caro's roots in English art tradition—roots that go   surfaces of their tactile connotations and render
            this country during 1963-4 (while teaching at   back literally to Perpendicular Gothic—become   them more 'optical'. I grant the essential impor-
            Bennington College) show a marked change of   more evident the longer one looks. A grand,   tance to Caro's art of colour in this role, but this is
            manner in which lightness and regularity override   sublime manner has been a peculiarly English   not to say that I, for one, find his colour satis-
            nearly everything else. Relationships become al-  aspiration since the eighteenth century. Henry   factory. I know of no piece of his, not even an un-
            most altogether rectangular and boxlike, and there   Moore and Francis Bacon are possessed by it in   successful one, that does not transcend its colour, or
            is a plain, emphasized symmetry. This forthright   their separate ways just as much as Haydon, John   whose  specific  colour or combination of colours
            symmetry has a startling effect insofar as it suggests   Martin and even Turner were in theirs. Without   does not detract from the quality of the whole
            a syntactic massiveness, so to speak, that takes over   maintaining necessarily that he is a better artist   (especially when there is more than one colour).
            the work of the literal massiveness of heavy steel in   than Turner, I would venture to say that Caro   In every case I have the impression that the colour
            Caro's English-made sculpture. Caro's American   comes closer to a genuine grand manner—genuine   is aesthetically (as well as literally) provisional—
            pieces are for the most part smaller and made of   because original and un-synthetic—than any   that it can be changed at will without decisively
            much lighter and thinner steel, but the foursquare   English artist before him.)   affecting quality.
           squatness that is imposed on them by their   Michael Fried speaks aptly of Caro's 'achieved   Here, as almost everywhere else in Western
            rectangular symmetry makes them look less fragile   weightlessness'. It is a kind of weightlessness that   sculpture, colour remains truly the 'secondary'
            than one would expect. The spectacular inner and   belongs, distinctively, to the new tradition of non-  property that philosophers used to think colour in
            outer play of Caro's English-made sculpture is   monolithic sculpture which has sprung from the   general was...
            missing, but the effect is almost as new intrinsically.   Cubist collage. Part of Caro's originality of style   It ought to be unnecessary to say that Caro's
             Nothing of the preceding applies to Caro's two   consists in denying weight by lowering as well as by   originality is more than a question of stylistic or
            last American-made works  Titan  and Bennington,   raising the things in his sculpture that signify it.   formal ingenuity. Were it that it would amount to
            which he finished before his return to London in   The pre-war Giacometti had a glimpse of this   no more than novelty, and taste would not, in the
           June of 1964. These are perhaps more purely,   possibility, but only a glimpse, even though he   event, find itself so challenged by it. Caro's art is
            more limpidly, masterpieces than anything he has   made several masterpieces from it. Caro works the   original because it changes and expands taste in
            done before. In them that search for a low centre   possibility out. By opening and extending a ground-  order to make room for itself. And it is able to do
            of gravity which is one of the most constant   hugging sculpture laterally, and inflecting it verti-  this only because it is the product of a necessity;
            features of his originality finds a perfect fulfillment.   cally in a way that accents the lateral movement,   only because it is compelled by a vision that is
             Groundflung, wide-open enclosures (in 'L' and   the plane of the ground is made to seem to move   unable to make itself known except by changing
            `T' form respectively) that are relieved by two or   too; it ceases being the base or foil against which   art. 	      El




            Far left: Month of May 1963
            steel and aluminium, orange, green, and red painted.
           127 x 130 x 131 in.
            Left: foreground, Slow movement 1965
            steel, blue painted, 50¾ x 106x 60 in.
            background, Yellow Swing 1965
            Right: foreground, Yellow Swing 1965
            steel, yellow painted, 40 x 40 x 161 in.
            background, Prima Luce1966
            steel, yellow painted, 81 x 140 x 47¼ in.
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60