Page 74 - Studio International - April 1968
P. 74

London commentary











       Six Polish Painters

       In this country we have had  plenty of evidence of   makes  is  of  rather  beautiful,  though  slightly  dis­  have  an  opportunity  to  complete  the  picture  of
       Polish  artistic  activity  in  the  cinema,  drama  and   turbing, fungoid washes of paint. Closer inspection   contemporary  Polish painting by an exhibition of
       poetry.  What  little we have seen of Polish painting   reveals  the  outline  of  a  crucified  figure,  most   the under-forties.   D
       and sculpture would encourage the view that these   clearly  in Man II,  but also,  strangely,  in  Tantalus.   Cyril Barrett
       arts lag behind the other  two.  Perhaps  this  is  the   Tadeusz Brzozowski-a painter of stature-conveys
       case, but,  having seen the exhibition of  Six  Polish   the  same feeling  both  in  the  troubled faces of  his
       Painters  at  the  Royal  College  of  Art  (organized   figures and in the suggestion of a barbed-wire mess
       by  the  Arts  Council  in  collaboration  with  the   in his abstracts.  The one  painter who  seems to  be
       Polish  Ministry  of Culture  and  the  Fine  Arts  and   breaking  out  of  this  Polish  preoccupation  is
       the  Polish  Cultural  Institute)  one  suspects  that   Aleksander  Kobzdej,  though  even  in his  'fissure'
       the  gap  may  not  be  too  great.  The  exhibition   paintings, which are more cosmopolitan than those
       included  a  selection  of posters in  which the  Poles   of his colleagues, there is still a certain spikiness.
       excel.  It was so placed, however, that many visitors   It  is  to  be  hoped  that  at  an  early  date  we  shall
       to the gallery must have missed it.
        The decision to limit the contributors to six-thus
       making it six  one-man  shows  rather than a repre­
       sentative show-was a wise one.  But  the  choice  of
       artists  raises  a doubt.  All six  artists  are over forty,
       two in fact, are no longer alive-Piotr Potworowski
       died in 1962, Tadeusz Makowski in 1932. Does this
       mean that the younger Polish artists are not up to
       the standard of the six or is this a first instalment,
       to be followed by another exhibition of the under­
       forties?
        Whether there is any significance in the fact that
       all six painters are in some way or another connec­
       ted  with Cracow,  I  cannot  say,  but  the  fact  that
       both  Makowski  and  Potworowski  spent  a  great
       part of their active life in Paris is clearly evident in
      their work. Makowski is a primitive who fell among
       Cubists and managed to absorb Cubism into his art.
       The charm and expressiveness of his world of folk
       art  and  fairytale,  with  its  starry-eyed  musiciam,
       artisans  and  children,  should  not  blind  us  to  the
       strength  and  mastery  of  his  compositions.  Pot­
       worowski-who  incidentally  spent  much  time  in
       this country,  taught at Corsham and was a friend
       of  the  'Cornish'  group,  Ben  Nicholson,  Peter
       Lanyon,  Bryan  Wynter  and  Patrick  Heron­
       practised a  softer, gentler form of Cubism. In some
       ways his patchwork use of colour is reminiscent of
       Klee,  as  if  he  were  transcribing  a  Braque  or  a
        icholson into a design suitable for a quilt.
        In  his  catalogue  introduction,  Dr  Stanislawski,
       Director of the Lodz Museum of Art and the man
       responsible for selecting the pictures, says that the
       same lyrical and expansive emotion is traceable in
       the work of the other four painters. While I hesitate
       to dissent from such an authority, especially on the
       basis  of  only  a  brief  visit  to  Poland  during  the
       closed season,  there seems to me to be a consider­
       able  difference in  feeling  between  the  two  groups
       and, moreover, the four seem to be far more typical
       of  what is specifically  Polish in  contemporary art.
       What this is I  find hard to define.  For one thing it
      is a sense of suffering and tragedy-which painters                                Above left  Tadeusz Makowski
      of  this  generation  must  have  experienced  at  first                          Miser 1932
      hand-sometimes  (though not quite in this exhibi­                                 oil  on canvas. 46¼  x  35 in.
      tion)  reaching  almost  to  morbidity.  Another
      ingredient is  a  slightly  (sometimes  a  pronounced)                            Above Aleksander Kobzdej
      uneasy  marriage  between  surrealist  imagery  and                               Fissure in Green 1967
      Abstract Expressionism.                                                           acrylic and  miscellaneous matter.  72  x  39½ in.
       This is to be found in its most obvious form in the
      work ofEugeniusz Markowski, but it is also, though                                 Left Jerzy Tchbrzewski
      to  a  lesser  extent,  in  that  of Jerzy  Tch6rzewski.                          Man  111967
      The  first  impression  which  Tch6rzewski's  work                                oil on canvas. 63  x  51 ¾ in.
      198
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79