Page 77 - Studio International - April 1968
P. 77

New York commentary





            Adolph Gottlieb at the Guggenheim
            and Whitney Museums; Neo-Impres-
            sionist paintings at the Guggenheim;
             Philip McCracken at Willard; Mary
             Frank at Zabriskie.
             More than twenty years after the identification of  historian's tools as comparisons and discussions of  years old.) They state, often in a sentence or two,
            Abstract Expressionism as a movement, Americans  `influences'. They shrink from revealing the full  the importance of these presences but they
            are still caught in an Orpheus dilemma. There is  measure of their youthful innocence and ignorance.  invariably hesitate to cite specific instances.
            a nagging impulse to turn back and look recent  They are relieved when their critics begin not at   Chroniclers of this period cannot be blamed too
            history full in the face; and there is a correspond-  the beginning, but at the beginning in which they  much for their cursory habits. America has only
            ingly strong desire to go on, as we usually have,  show some measure of maturity and originality.  recently become document-conscious (swerving off
            lightly skimming the past and acting always as  It is as though the exposure of the years that pre-  course to a ridiculous extreme, as in the Pollock
            though the beginning were now.           ceded the kind of coalescence that came to be  exhibition). In the old days, writers rarely bothered
             These conflicting valences show up in a series of  called a movement could in some way take away  to record a running commentary on the lives of
            one-man museum exhibitions during the past ten  from the book-keeping of their ultimate achieve-  young artists. Magazines were few, and largely
            years or so, designed to document individual  ments.                              reactionary. Critics were mostly hostile. And the
            achievements within the movement. Specialists   The museum exhibitions are gradually becoming  artists themselves were caught up in more urgent
            charged with sorting out the rather complicated  fuller, but they still stop short of the real probing  matters.
            affairs of the Abstract Expressionists usually do try  that could set these works within a coherent   As a result, the contemporary historian is forced
            to look back, but often they don't look very far and  historical matrix.          to rely on the faulty memories, often heavily edited,
            they don't look very hard.                For instance, catalogue writers dutifully recite a  of the artists he is discussing. This is at best a
             Their reluctance to probe the youthful formation  few established circumstances, such as the Depres-  hazardous technique of writing history. It is not
             of each artist is due partly to the artists' own  sion with its emergency art projects, its flourishing  hard to understand why the critic or historian feels
             reticence. Even though by quick American stan-  mural teams, and the  esprit de corps  it sponsored  safer when he begins not at the beginning, but only
            dards a great deal of time has passed, many  among artists. Also they always remark the fact  at that point where there is an identifiable move-
            surviving artists still feel traditional American  that many Europeans, and more particularly the  ment, the point being given usually as around 1940.
             insecurity, secretly doubting what they read about  Surrealists Masson, Breton, Ernst, Tanguy et al.,   This is what the GUGGENHEIM and WHITNEY
             their real achievements. They worked for too long  arrived in the United States at the outset of the  MUSEUMS did in an unprecedented collaborative
            in a harsh province to have the kind of assurance  Second World War when the Abstract Expres-  exhibition of the work of Adolph Gottlieb. The
             their counterparts in Europe might have. Accord-  sionist generation had about come of age. (Its  Guggenheim Museum offered the 'early' work—
            ingly, they are not happy with such indispensable   members were then between twenty-five and forty   that is, paintings from 1941 to the mid-1950s, and










































             Above Adolph Gottlieb                    Right Georges Seurat
             Hidden image 1950                       The model (Poseuse de face) 1890
             oil on canvas                           oil on wood
             42  x 54 in.                            10++x 6f in.
             The Solomon R. Guggenheim                The Solomon R. Guggenheim
             Museum. New York                         Museum, New York
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82