Page 29 - Studio International - November 1968
P. 29

what sort of perceptions or experiences gave you the material for sculpture that  art? You couldn't have seen a great deal of European art, especially not much
              you knew was truly yours?                                    European sculpture of the first importance. How did you re-act to Western
               I ought to explain that at the time I was doing pieces like the tri-  art when you got to know it?—How did it figure in your work?
               angular rhythmic sculpture I described, I had left St Martin's and  As a matter of fact, I grew up with very little art in Singapore. When
              was working at the Slade. I had been at St Martin's for two years.  I came to England and began doing art I began looking. My desire
               Ideas like the wedges in rhythm were developed at the Slade. The  to work in art was an internal and personal thing, and had not much
               policy of the Slade then was to leave one much more to one's own  to do with my early cultural environment. I suspect that my empathy
               devices than St Martin's. I used to explore the museums and  is temperamental; I prefer an art that has quietude and contain-
              libraries on my own. I discovered Brancusi and the Matisse backs.  ment. This describes classical Western art, the art of the Greek
               These things seemed a great gift; they excited my own feelings and  orders and of Brancusi and Matisse, as much as it does the art of the
               brought me closer to finding a sculptural form for those feelings. This  East. But this quietude and containment is more often to be found in
              was very different from mere art study.                      Eastern art than in Western.
                                                                            When I first began to be familiar with Western art I found much of
               Were Brancusi and Matisse part of your academic study? Were they con-  it aggressive. Think of Michelangelo! But I was able to enjoy this
              sidered at the Slade?                                        Western robustness; I didn't find it intimidating. I came to under-
               Not at all. The Brancusi book was in the Library, but nobody ever  stand that it was capable of delicate effects as well as forceful ones.
              mentioned him to me. What was important was falling into the habit  Michelangelo's  Pieta  is one of the most moving depositions I have
              of looking at things for one's self, going to the works. I was lucky to  ever seen. But sculpture of all times and societies deals with many of
               have discovered this; freedom and opportunity came together. When  the same basic issues and shares attitudes or declares quite opposite
               I travelled back to Singapore on visits to my family, I used to stop  positions about such matters as the relationship of space and mass.
              off wherever I could to see whatever there was—Athens, the  The obvious differences, subject matter and superficial treatment,
              caves of Ajunta and Ellora. When I first saw the cycladic  often hide important similarities and sympathies. For me, the
              sculptures, it was a fantastic feeling of confirmation I felt. I'd had the  experience of sculpture, West and East, taught me what sculpture is
              dim sense of some such simplicity, some such silence, but I never  about. Experience gave me the motive to go on.
              imagined the full impact these works made, their great scale from,
              as it seemed, practically nothing. They were almost immaterialized  What line did your development take once you left the Slade?
              in their translucent marble.                                 The elements in the sculptures grew in dimension, in size rather than
                                                                           in scale at first, so that the obvious material to use became laminated
               Were you influenced—sympathetic would probably be a better word—to art of a  blockboard. Natural logs were too small for the areas I wanted to
              particular time or culture? Were you, are you, for example, particularly  cover. Blockboard could be built to any required thickness. At this
              related to Chinese art, being Chinese, or to the art of the Orient?   point, too, the forms became flatter—some of them were only 2½ in.
              Not Chinese art specifically. But I have a great empathy for Eastern  thick. Candy, which I did in 1965, is a fair example of these interests.
              art of the past—for instance, to the non-verbal experience of the Zen   R.R., done the same year, is another. I wanted a frontal confronta-
              Garden.                                                      tion with this piece. Walking round this sculpture will provide an
                                                                           explanation rather than a discovery. R.R. is the first piece where I
               Were you wholly conscious of this empathy when you came to England to study   use recession, in the form of three successive planes. The silhouette



































                                                                          far left. Echo, 1967
                                                                          painted steel, 30+ in. high
                                                                          left, Day, 1966
                                                                          painted steel. 85 in. high
                                                                          above, Step, 1966
                                                                          painted steel, 36 x 50 in.
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34