Page 32 - Studio International - November 1968
P. 32

The A is different but the B remains the same















      Peter Schmidt describes his work and his paintings, which are exhibited at the Lisson Gallery,
      68 Bell Street, London, N.W.1, throughout November. His monoprints will be shown at the Alecto Gallery,
      38 Albermarle Street, W.1, in December. The introductory note is by Jasia Reichardt.
      Most pictures, indeed any works, yield extra information when they  take its place. This something else was more acceptable, but it was
      are examined closely, but few give an exact key of the processes  less me. I wondered whether or not to go to art school, anticipating
      which are involved, even under such very close scrutiny. In this  that if I went the production of pictures that had the qualities that I
      sense, the paintings of Peter Schmidt are exceptional. They embody  wanted would become even more difficult. In a conversation with a
      a considerable variety both in form and mood, and they provide  friend at that time I was given the advice that the effect of going
      information about the systems on which they are based when  would in fact be to make it impossible to produce pictures that had
      examined closely. Travelling around a Peter Schmidt painting one  any of the qualities that I started out with, but that nevertheless it
      might find that in one direction, say, vertically, the colour of a series  was necessary. To arrest the process of decay and possible subse-
      of elements changes from grey to green, simultaneously another  quent regrowth was quite wrong, like an attempt to preserve oneself
      series progressing horizontally changes from black to white. Mean-  in aspic.
      while large discs become tiny and on the entire orchestration is super-  I went to art school. As predicted, my drawing improved and the
      imposed a series of increasingly expansive white spaces, emanating  pictures got worse. When I tried to force the issue and to produce
      from the centre. The process is logical, and often complex. What is  paintings using the knowledge I had acquired, they were false. I
      interesting, however, is that having decided on the parameters—the  became interested in other artists. I liked Van Gogh, and became
      range of colours, and forms, and the system which will manipulate  interested in the way in which his pictures were a fusion of a pas-
      them—the result is unforseeable, both to the artist himself and his  sionate interest in his subject and a very matter of fact use of paint
      audience. It may seem a contradiction that any system which  as a coloured substance which can be used to cover a surface. I
      Schmidt follows does in fact embody such random and unexpected  disliked Cezanne. At a lecture at the Slade I tried to explain to the
      qualities; but if you proceed, for instance, over a surface diagonally  lecturer why I found Van Gogh so much preferable to Cezanne, and
      in increasing steps and with increasing intensity of colour, and the  ended up by saying that Cezanne played a kind of game with his
      marks you are making are superimposed on an already existing  subject matter, alternatively embracing it and destroying it, in
      pattern, the outcome must be unexpected.                    favour of the abstract qualities of the picture, and always seemed
       The very notion of having a system in relation to making paintings  finally to push the subject gently away from himself, as though with
      is often anathema to those who value the mysterious and the intuitive,  his fingertips. A few days after this I began to learn Cezanne's
      the free and the expressionist, in art. Systems, nevertheless, dispense  language, and ended up liking him very much. I spent about five
      neither with intuition nor with mystery. Intuition is instrumental in  years trying to be Cezanne. Again, I was fascinated by the apparently
      the design of the system and mystery always remains in the final  irreconcilable qualities of great devotion to the subject matter and a
      result. Schmidt's paintings are in the truest sense experiments since  scrupulous use of paint as paint. I learned something about colour,
      each work consists of new propositions and their unexpected out-  and limited my palette to yellow, red, blue and white.
      come.  	                                      Jasia  Reichardt   Soon after I left art school, I began to teach at an art school. The
                                                                  students were not interested in Cezanne. I began to talk to them
      When I first started to paint it was like magic; it still is, but only  about the ideas of Paul Klee, but did not allow myself to use these
      occasionally. At that time I suddenly found myself able to do some-  ideas in my own painting, I arrived at a point where the student's
      thing, something which I knew quite definitely to be impossible, to  paintings were better than my own. I was frightened of being
      be beyond my powers, and in private I used to laugh at myself for the  intellectual, as I had learned to regard intellectual as a term of abuse.
      arrogance, for the presumption, and was inwardly sure that it would  Gradually I succumbed to the influence of Klee and of Webern. I
      all come to nothing. All the same, it was magic, and when I looked at  worked on paintings in which each colour and shape decision was
      the pictures I could see that they were real and that I had in fact done  arrived at after a considerable period of thought. Sometimes I would
      them, and that it was not impossible but possible. I also decided at  wait several hours before making a small coloured mark on the
      that time that it was useless for me to try to learn to draw as it was  painting. I still trusted my decisions, but the tendency became to
      obviously impossible. I had never done art at school. I'd been quite  make decisions that were expectable or that went well with what had
      interested in mathematics and vaguely anticipated that I might be-  already been done. After working on a picture for a considerable
      come a mathematician. Suddenly, without knowing from where it  time I no longer had the ability to make startling decisions which
      came, something had happened, and it seemed a natural consequence  were capable of changing the painting. I'd come to the point where
      that I would continue painting, and a consequence of this decision was  I had to distrust my aesthetic decisions, where good taste had begun
      that I should go to art school. By this time I had compromised, and  to creep up on me, and where the pictures were beautiful, decorative
      had decided to try drawing, and had found that it was in fact possible.  and sterile.
       However, what had originally been happening in the pictures I did   The way out came from the least expected source, from those very
      was beginning to disappear, and something else was beginning to  intellectual, mathematical powers which I had rejected ten years
      190
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37