Page 48 - Studio International - May 1969
P. 48

The art scene in


      Scandinavia



      Edward Lucie-Smith













      Contemporary  Scandinavian  artists,  unlike   'middle generation'.                 mises,  and  there  have  been  demonstrations
     contemporary  Scandinavian  craftsmen,  have   The  oppressive  grandeur  of  Norwegian   recently at the gallery. If Mr Moe can make it
      made  little  impact  in  Britain.  This  seems   scenery  is  often  cited  as  one  of  the  reasons   yet more irritant, and not on political grounds
     curious because the social organization of the   why  Norwegian  painters  have  found  it  diffi­  alone,  the effects on Norwegian art might be
      Scandinavian  countries is so closely similar to   cult  to  accommodate  themselves  to  such   profound.
     our  own,  and  the artist therefore finds  him­  essentially urban  stylistic experiments as pop   Norwegians,  who  seldom  have  a  good  word
     self  in  an  almost  precisely  similar  kind  of   art.  But there  are  also  other  reasons.  One  is   to  say  for  their  Swedish  neighbours,  cur­
     framework.  The  lack  of  communication   something which is in many ways admirable­  rently  contend  that  Swedish  art  has  lost  its
     begins  to  be  less  surprising,  however,  when   the fact that it is difficult in Norway to draw   soul  in  the  frenzied  pursuit  of  novelty.
     one  considers  the  sharp  contrasts  to  be  dis­  a firm line between the arts and the crafts.  A   London  gallery-goers  will  have  an  oppor­
     covered  even  in  Scandinavia-the difference,   maker  of  tapestries,  such  as  Siri  Blakstad,  is   tunity to judge for themselves when  an exhi­
     for  instance,  between  current  modes  of   just as much an 'artist' as an artist who paints   bition  of  work  by  six  of  the  leading younger
     artistic activity in Norway and in Sweden.   or  sculpts.  Indeed,  in  many  ways  her  situa­  Swedish  artists  opens  at  the  CAMDEN  ART
     Norway produced the man who is perhaps the   tion  is  more  fortunate  than  theirs-since  the   CENTRE  this  month,  as  part  of  the  Camden
     greatest  of  all  Scandinavian  artists-Edvard   tradition she works in is stronger,  she is freer   Festival.  The  artists  exhibiting  are  Sivert
      Munch.  Both the NATIONAL GALLERY in Oslo   to  experiment.  The  craftsman's  feeling  for   Lindblom,  Lars  Englund,  Leif  Wollter,  Olle
     and  RASMUS  MEYER's  COLLECTION  in  Bergen   beautiful  surfaces,  beautiful  textures,  beauti­  Kaks,  Ulrik  Samuelsson  and  Per-Olof  Ulte­
     contain immensely fine examples of  Munch's   ful  materials,  is  a  help  to  her  where  it  is   vedt. Taken together, they offer a fairly good
     work, but one probably gets the fullest idea of   probably  a  hindrance  to  the  Norwegian   cross-section  of  the  kind  of  work  which  is
     his  genius  in  the  new  MUNCH  MUSEUM  in   painter.                              currently being shown in Stockholm itself.
     Oslo, which houses the painter's bequest to his   Another reason is that there is a  certain lack   The  prevailing  tone  could  probably  best  be
     countrymen of all the work which remained in   of edge to the Norwegian art-scene. There are   described  as  'neo-surrealist'.  Samuelsson,  for
     his  own  possession  at his  death.  As  a  collec­  few  commercial  galleries  in  Oslo,  but  a   instance, is a maker of elaborate, rather dandi­
     tion,  it is analogous  to,  but  even  more  com­  number  of  co-operative  ones.  It is  compara­  fied  environments.  A  whole  room  will  be
     plete than, the Turner Bequest in London.   tively easy for an  artist to achieve an exhibi­  retailored  to  the  artist's  specifications.  One
      Munch,  however,  remains  a  curiously  iso­  tion, but he receives no sustained promotion.   was  recently  shown  at the  GALERIE  BUREN  in
     lated  figure-he  seems  to  have  exercised  a   There is also little competition from outside, to   Stockholm-it  gave  the  spectator  the  impres­
     general rather than a particular influence over   stir  art  to life.  An  enthusiastic  young  dealer,   sion  that  he  was  standing  inside  a  painting
     twentieth-century Norwegian art.  This really   such as  ROLF  GRUDE,  is  something of  a rarity,   by Magritte, which had suddenly become life­
     traces back its pedigree to the small group of   and  it  is  no  accident  that  he  handles  the   size and three-dimensional.  This gallery-one
     Norwegian  painters  who  were  pupils  of   work of Per Kleiva, perhaps the most interest­  of  a  group  of  excellent  small  avant-garde
      Matisse.  Thanks,  perhaps,  to  this  illustrious   ing of  the younger Norwegians. Kleiva is now   galleries in the city-has also shown Englund,
     schooling, Norwegian art has remained under   working in an idiom which seems to owe some­  Kaks  and  Lindblom.  Englund  makes  inter­
     the  dominance  of  Paris  to  the  present  day.   ing to Albers.                   esting inflatables, perhaps a trifle indebted to
     The best-established Norwegian painters tend   The single  factor  which  seems  most  likely  to   Warhol,  Lindblom  makes  three-dimensional
     to  be  informal  abstractionists,  very  much  in   change  all  this  is  the  Henie-Onstad benefac­  plastic  objects  which  (apparently  abstract
     the  French  manner-the  French  manner  of   tion which  I've already mentioned.  It is un­  when first looked at) suddenly disclose a head
     the immediately post-war years.            necessary to describe the collection in detail­  or  a  figure:  a  kind  of  communion-rail  with
     The  collection  of  the  HENIE-ONSTAD  FOUNDA­  suffice  it to  say that it is largely based on the   turned  balusters  will  reveal,  on  a  second
      TION, 1  housed in a  magnificent new building   kind of  French art which was  fashionable in   inspection, that the interstices are shaped like
     just outside Oslo, offers a glimpse of the close   the  nineteen-fifties.  There  are  no  less  than   a  man's  figure.  Ultevedt,  of  a  generation
     relationship  between  Norwegian  artists  and   twenty-two  pictures  by  Esteve,  for  instance.   slightly  senior  to  that  of  the  others,  creates
      this now rather faded Parisian style. The work   But  the  collection  has  provided  the  pretext   eccentric machines with affinities to the work
      of Jacob Weidemann,  who  is  one  of  the  few   for  a  superb  museum  building,  and  the   of  Tinguely and  Bruce  Lacey.
      Norwegian  artists  to  be  represented  in  the   director of the Foundation, Ole Hendrik Moe,   One  can  supplement  the  survey  which  the
      collection,  is  virtually  indistinguishable  in   has plans to use this as the setting for a series   exhibition  offers  of current trends in Sweden
     style  from  that  of  Bazaine,  Esteve,  Soulages   of  provocative  temporary  shows.  There  is   by mentioning one or two  other names.  Per­
     and  the  rest.  If there  is a point of difference,   talk,  for  instance,  of  bringing  Mark  Boyle   haps the most impressive one-man show I saw
      it  lies  in  Weidemann's  evident  feeling  for   and  the  Exploding  Galaxy  to  Norway.  The   in Stockholm was that of P.  G.  Thelander at
     nature.  His  abstractions  are  always  abstrac­  Henie-Onstad  Foundation  is  already  some­  the  GALERIE  HEDENIUS.  Thelander  would  in­
     tions from landscape, and the same holds true   what  controversial-the  Norwegian  student   evitably  remind  the  English  gallery-goer  of
      I  think  of  most  Norwegian  artists  of  the   Left are offended  by the  'luxury'  of  its  pre-  Kitaj: that is,  he is a kind of hermetic figura-
      228
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53