Page 43 - Studio International - April 1970
P. 43

all the photographs here. Their factual   source objects, should protect their authenti-  Air de Paris, 1919. That sample of the atmos-
          appearance is maintained through even the   city ultimately. In the present instance, in   phere is contained in a sealed glass ampule, of
          most problematic relationships.           `Artists & Photographs', the contents of the   which one would have to say, this is  not  a
          One of the uses of photography is to provide   catalogue are variants of the items in the   piece of laboratory equipment, etc. The
          the co-ordinates of absent works of art. Earth-  exhibition, not reproductions. Both the exhibi-  artists in both cases work against the reduc-
          works, for example, such as Robert Smith-  ted 'object' and the catalogue 'entry' are   tion of the photograph or the object to a
         son's, can sometimes be experienced on the   permutations made possible by the repeata-  channel function.)
         spot, but not for long and not by many     bility of the photographic process.       Michael Kirby takes 'clarity as the only con-
          people. Documentation distributes and makes   Michael Heizer has discussed the role of   scious standard' in both shooting and develo-
          consultable the work of art that is inacces-  photography in relation to his own work. Of a   ping his photographs, but the result is not
         sible, in a desert, say, or ephemeral, made of   work in Nevada he writes: 'It is being photo-  record but source. In  Pont Neuf  he uses six
          flowers. The photographic record is eviden-  graphed throughout its disintegration'.3  The   photographs, taken from one point, to pro-
          tial, but it is not a reproduction in the sense   run of photographs records the return of   vide views of the surrounding space: the work
          that a compact painting or a solid object can   probability to his initial interruption of the   can, as it were, be inferred backwards to the
          be reproduced as a legible unit. The docu-  landscape. He points out that photographs   converging point. Jan Dibbets's work is in-
          mentary photograph is grounds for believing   are like drawings, as the basic graphic form of   conceivable without monocular vision (that
          that something happened.                  his big works in the landscape is recovered in   is, a camera) ; his 'perspective corrections',
          Photographs used as co-ordinates, or as   aerial photography which shows the earth's   whether constructions built in a field or areas
          echoes, soundings that enable us to deduce   surface as an inscribed plane. Related to the   ploughed on a beach, demand one absolute
          distant or past events and objects, are not the   concise graphism of photographs is the   viewpoint to be effective. Only from that one
         same as works of art in their operation. Max   camera's effectiveness as an image-maker.   point can his inversion of distance give the
          Bense has divided art and photography like   Heizer's own bleak landscapes, like excava-  appearance of flat squares and posts of
          this: 'The aesthetic process in painting is   tion sites, Smithson's photographing of   identical size.
         directed towards creation: the aesthetic pro-  mirrors in a pattern in landscapes to make a   The artistic ideas and operations that need
         cess of photography has to do with trans-  compound play of reference levels, and Rich-  photographic documentation are especially
         mission'. 'Painting reveals itself more strongly   ard Long's walks in the country with regular   those that are modified in time. Time, in fact,
         as a "source" art, and photography more   stops for documentation with a camera (of   is central to photography. In the case of
         strongly as a "channel" art.'1             the view, not of the walker) presuppose a   Christo there is data on the wrapping of a
         Dennis Oppenheim classifies photographic   photographic step in the work process. As   tower, some of it prospective (diagrammatic
         documentation as a 'secondary statement ...   Oppenheim has said : 'Communication out-  or simulated) and some of it memorial; the
         after the fact',2  the fact being, of course, the   side the system of the work will take the form   work process is arrested at different points in
         work out in the field. He feels restricted be-  of photographic documentation ...'.4    time. Sol LeWitt's  Muybridge III  takes a
         cause 'the photograph gives constant reference   Other artists in this exhibition/catalogue use   classic image of motion (successive views of a
         to the rectangle. This forces any idea into the   the camera as a tool with which to initiate   walking nude) and encloses it to be viewed
         confines of pictorial illusionism.' However,   ideas rather than to amplify or record them.   directionally. Dan Graham's work alludes to
         the distinction between source art and channel   Edward Ruscha is represented by Baby Cakes,   Muybridge's measured walking images, but
         art enables us to disregard the four edges as a   one of the factual series of photographs which   here it is the walkers who take relational
         design factor; the area of the photograph is   began as early as 1962 with his book  Twenty-  photographs of one another. The slides are
         simply the size of the sample of information   six Gasoline Stations. This book, like his later   then projected quickly on two screens, com-
         transmitted, a glimpse. Common to both the   ones, is neither sociological (the sample of   pressing the original time sequence. Robert
         absent original and to the photographic   subjects is arbitrary) nor formalistic (the   Morris's piece is a record of a 'continuous pro-
         record is phototopic or day vision, with light   imagery is casual), but it is a concordance of   ject (altered daily)'. Only by photography
         as the medium of perception on the site and   decisions, unmistakeably aesthetic, for all   can the temporal route of a work of art be
         in the record. The works are, after all,   their deadpan candour, in the absence of   recorded in such terms homologous to the
         photographable.                           other purposes. Similarly Bruce Nauman's   original events. It should be stressed that it is
         There is the possibility that documents, as   photographs of the air (sky?) over Los   not a question of memorializing a favourite
         accumulating at present, may acquire the   Angeles solidifies the channel functions of   state, catching the work's best profile, but of
         preciousness that we associate with, say,   photography into a source art. In such works   following the process.
         limited-edition graphics. The development of   the photographs are themselves an object, an   These artists occupy various points in a zone
         Earthworks or Street Events is resistant to the   original structure projected by the artist. The   that includes Conceptual Art, Earthworks,
         possession of art as usually understood and   information that Nauman's photographs   Happenings. Conceptual Art, to the extent
         photography resists becoming personal pro-  carry cannot be decoded as news of weather   that it is to be thought about, or repeated, or
         perty by its potentially endless reproduction.   or pollution or as a lack of unidentified flying   enacted by others, insists on documentation
         The fact that photographs are multiple    objects. (The information that Nauman's   systems originated by the artist himself. This is no
         originals, not unique originals, as well as one's   LAAIR does not carry, though it looks as if it   less true of performance arts, such as Happen-
         sense of them as evidence rather than as    might, is different from Marcel Duchamp's    ings or Events, which survive verbally as
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48