Page 49 - Studio International - February 1970
P. 49

another whole. There is no implication that   openness, wholeness and scale that he has   it is thin enough to show brushmarks and
          the parts extend beyond the edges, just as   developed. The colour, areas and stripes are   becomes a little illusionistic. Newman's
          there is none that they occur within the edges.   not obscured or diluted by a hierarchy of   colour is itself a major and influential
          Everything is specifically where it is. This   composition and a range of associations. The   achievement. It is full, rich and somewhat
          wholeness is also new and important. It is   few parts, all equally primary, comprise the   austere, for example, a lot of maroon and a
          why the stripes and the edges correspond.   quality of a painting.                  little orange or a full blue and a whitened
          Mondrian's work, taking it as representative   `We are reasserting man's natural desire for   cerulean blue.  Vir Heroicus Sublimis is a good
          of his generation, if greater, clearly has tradi-  the exalted, for a concern with our relation-  example of the colour. The black and white is
          tional and naturalistic aspects. The lines are   ship to the absolute emotions. We do not need   also colour. Obviously neither this colour nor
          dominant and the white is secondary, volume   the obsolete props of an outmoded and anti-  the handling of the paint is pure and geo-
          and space once removed. The white is both   quated legend. We are creating images whose   metric. As with the canvas, there is much that
          comparatively frontal, only recessed a few   reality is self-evident and which are devoid of   is specific about what Newman does with the
          inches, and infinitely recessive. The lines form   the props and crutches that evoke associations   paint, much that is particular to it, such as
          a bound structure and one that is very    with outmoded images, both sublime and    the way it bled under the masking tape along
          ordered. Newman's work is not geometric in   beautiful. We are freeing ourselves of the   the narrow black stripe in Shining Forth or the
          this sense, just as neither his nor Pollock's is   impediments of memory, association, nostal-  effect of stencilling in the white stripe. Simi-
          expressionistic. Mondrian's fixed platonic   gia, legend, myth, or what have you, that   larly, Newman sometimes leaves brushstrokes
          order is no longer credible. 'Hard-edge-  have been the devices of Western European   along an area, since that is the way the paint
          painting,' primarily defined by Ellsworth   painting. Instead of making cathedrals  out of   was applied. A good deal more could be said
          Kelly's work, is mainly old abstraction.2  It   Christ, man, or 'life', we are making it out of   about Newman's work, but there isn't space.
          employs, though somewhat abridged, the new   ourselves, out of our own feelings. The image   Shining Forth, Noon-light and  Vir Heroicus Sub-
          scale and simplicity and has some of the new   we produce is the self-evident one of revela-  limis are great paintings. 	q
          specificity of colour but also uses the old   tion, real and concrete, that can be understood
          abstract space, composition and colour. The   by anyone who will look at it without the
                                                                                              1   Frank Stella has done a lot of good paintings since
          openness of Newman's work is concomitant   nostalgic glasses of history.' 3         1964 and he shouldn't be second even to Newman.
                                                                                              [Don Judd 1969]
          with chance and one person's knowledge; the   We are making it out of ourselves.
                                                                                              2  I haven't changed my mind about the paintings I was
          work doesn't suggest a great scheme of    The colour or bare canvas of Newman's     writing about, the Arpish ones, but Kelly's later
                                                                                              rectangular paintings are another case. At the time I
          knowledge; it doesn't claim more than any-  paintings is very frontal and is necessarily
                                                                                              had seen one early sectional rectangular painting in a
          one can know; it doesn't imply a social order.   spreading, lateral. The doubled frontality of   Green Gallery Show but didn't know there were more
                                                                                              like it and took it for a fluke. [Don Judd, 1969]
          Newman is asserting his concerns and know-  Shining Forth  is an example. The colour is   3   Extract from 'The Sublime is Now', by Barnett New-
          ledge. He couldn't do this without the    usually applied flatly and thinly. Infrequently    man, Tiger's Eye, Vol. 1, December 1948.
                                                                                                                                   69
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54