Page 51 - Studio International - June 1970
P. 51

Having known of Kadishman's work only by
          reputation and by the few pieces I had seen
          in the United States and Europe, I was
          thoroughly unprepared for the sculptures that
          he made last autumn in Uruguay. During the
          period that we were both there for Angel
          Kalenberg's first Symposium of Sculpture of
          Montevideo, Kadishman made two important
          works, both destined for permanent installa-
          tion in a beautiful grove of eucalyptus trees
          within a park on the outskirts of Montevideo.
          The first of these two was a series of three
          identical steel cylinders, each with its ends
          open and more than six feet in diameter. A
          steel slat, spanning the interior of each
          cylinder and with its broad side vertical,
          completed the work. Painted yellow except
          for the contrasting blue of the interior slats,
          the cylinders sat side by side with their outer
          diameters touching each other; the final
          effect was that of seeing a playfully poly-
          chromed trio of locomotive wheels or giant
          gears. It is a work which may be easily
          situated historically and stylistically within
          the context of young English sculptors associ-
          ated with St Martin's—Annesley and Tucker
          have both made pieces to which these cylinders
          may be compared.
          Kadishman, however, began his career as a
          sculptor with works in stone, chiselled or piled
          in cairns in the manner of Shemi Haber; his
          recent work has been closer in spirit to this
          tradition than to the St Martin's group,
          despite his frequent use of steel, plastic, wood,
          and plate-glass as materials. One of Kadish-  It is interesting to compare Kadishman's idea   picture plane.
          man's favourite devices during the late 1960s   with a similar project of Jan Dibbets that was   The perceptual tensions between shallow and
         was in fact to incorporate sheets of glass or   executed in 1969 and illustrated in the cata-  deep space, as well as the overall lateral
         plastic into his sculpture. To these sheets he   logue of his recent exhibition at Krefeld.   extent of the perceptual field—both of which
         attached volumes of wood or other solid    Although in both instances trees within a   the artist established intuitively and empiri-
         materials, usually by a notched fitting, in   forest were singled out by coloured markings,   cally—are indications that this work derives
         such a way that these solid volumes seemed to   Dibbets chose a grove in which all the trees   from a traditional source of modernist art,
         be suspended in air.                       had been planted at fairly even intervals in   namely the cubist sensibility. This cubist
         The preoccupation with air spacing and     straight parallel rows; and he then isolated   orientation emerges with greater clarity in
         levitational effects achieves its greatest success   a single row of trees with paint applied to each   Kadishman's documentary graphics based on
         thus far in Kadishman's second Montevideo   tree trunk for the first 4 or 5 feet above the   the Montevideo 'forest'.
         project,  The Forest.  The artist nailed a large   ground.
         quantity of rectangular metal sheets to the   The differences between this project and   [On the occasion of his one-man exhibition
         trunks of trees scattered through the forest   Kadishman's forest are mutually illuminating.   now at the Jewish Museum, New York, until
         within an area of two or three acres. The   Although both cases show an interest in   June 21, Menashe Kadishman has executed a
         rectangles were attached vertically at a more   isolating a part of nature from its context   new version of  The Forest  in Manhattan's
         or less uniform height, oriented so that their   through visual means, Dibbets's concern here   Central Park.]
         surfaces would all be visible from a vantage   would seem to have been more conceptual
         point at the edge of the forest, and painted   and a priori in character, as is apparent from
         bright yellow. The effect, as Kadishman    his choice of a straight line of trees rather than
         described it, was that of a 'forest within a   the more random, less geometrical configura-
         forest' : the empirically placed yellow panels,   tion which Kadishman adopted. It is the
         separated from each other in real space,   difference between Versailles and an English
         created a visual configuration within the   garden, or between the Cartesian and empiri-
         forest that rivalled nature and was in contrast   cist traditions. It is also the difference between
         and counterpoint to nature. Saturated yellow   conceptual and perceptual art; and Kadish-
         is a colour that occurs rarely in nature in any   man's art, here as well as in other examples,
         concentration, and even more rarely in a   falls clearly into the second category. For
         forest. It is a man-made thing, like the straight   Kadishman, in marking his trees and creating
         geometrical edges of Kadishman's panels.   a 'forest within a forest', has established a
         Within the natural forest this man-made    perceptual and even pictorial situation, in
         forest brought to mind the blazes used to   which his rectangular yellow planes act as
         mark a trail, or targets on a practice range.   disjunctive segments of an implicit, single
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56