Page 66 - Studio International - May 1970
P. 66

4
                                                                                          Theo van Doesburg
                                                                                          Arithmetic Composition 1930
                                                                                          Oil on canvas 101 x 101 cm.
                                                                                          5
                                                                                          Henryk Stazewski
                                                                                          Composition aux Factures Diverses c. 1930
                                                                                          Oil on canvas 70 x 86 cm.
                                                                                          6
                                                                                          Josef Albers Graphic 1933
                                                                                          7
                                                                                          Sonia Delaunay Drawing 1933

      Chardin, riding comet-tails with Eisenberg,   exponents, linked with the Galerie Denise   `illusions of depth', are precursors of genius.
      Vasarely falls over his own feet. There is, for   Rene, were artist such as Dewasne, Deyrolle,   The confusion here is between designers.
      example, a contradiction between his refer-  Poliakoff, Pillet, Jacobsen and Mortensen.   expedients and artistic principles. In the
      ences to vibration, motion, the ephemeral,   On the other hand Concrete art  was derived   1920s, Vasarely never publicized his re-
      and his dogged search for 'certain constants   from van Doesburg, Bill and Lohse, for whom   searches as expressions of the idea of de-
      running through all creation and all times.   a surface is a programmed social organization   materialization and optical disruption of the
      ... I have succeeded in progressively isolating   which assigns no role to composition, to   picture plane. He never attributed any
      certain constants of artistic form founded on   balance, to the irrational or to the arbitrary   aesthetic significance to these designs (as was
      plane geometry. Why should one not achieve   selection of forms; each element in the whole   done in 1930, for example, by the Polish
     a codification of plastic means ?'         structure is part of a system which applies to   artist Stazewski, whose optical works were
     As if the ideas of plane geometry, surfaces,   all the details of the picture. It was not until   shown last year at the Musée Galliera, and
      plasticity, were not subject to mutation; as if   1962, under the influence of the Groupe de   who explicitly attacks the idea of 'the funda-
      colour itself were not subject to historical   Recherche d'Art Visuel, that Vasarely passed   mental indivisibility of the surface'.
      conditioning ! As Meyerson said fifteen years   unobtrusively from one of these tendencies to   The truth is that Vasarely did his first paint-
     ago, `[colour] seems to us to be a fact of   the other; he went on to elaborate systematic   ings in 1944-45 (The Metro, Seven rears' Bad
     human life in which various societies, tech-  programmes of his own.                 Luck  and a self-portrait) ; that he held his
     niques and arts have added in turn their   That is not all. Vasarely maintains a confusion   first exhibition, of representational-symbolist
     contributions to the basic framework provided   between the commercial art of his pre-war   paintings, in 1946, with a catalogue preface
     by human physiology.' In an age when the   period—he worked mainly for pharmaceutical   by Jacques Prevert ; and that he showed his
      painting, the sculpture, the object in general   firms—and his artistic output proper, which   first abstract composition in 1947. In short,
     are constantly called in question, by such   came much later. Influenced, like many other   he is in no sense, as he would have us believe,
     ideas as spectator involvement and the total   designers in the 1930s, by the Cassandre   a contemporary of Albers, who has somehow
     environment, it is hard to imagine a set of   style and by the gestaltist tricks taught by   strayed into our midst.
     rules in whose name aesthetic effect can be   the Bauhaus—he had studied in Budapest   What exactly is the contribution of Vasarely
     codified, as Vasarely proposes, in a two-  under a former student of the Dessau Bauhaus   to modern art ? The trouble with this extra-
     dimensional alphabet consisting of a few   —Vasarely did a certain number of designs,   ordinary man is that with him nothing is
     signs.                                     all figurative, incorporating certain optical   simple. Influences? He recognizes none. His
     There also exists in Vasarely's words—and in   devices, retinal stimuli which he presents   most important intuitions come to him
     his work— a manifest contradiction between   today as premonitions of Op Art. If this is so,   through the contemplation of nature, and not,
     two very different tendencies within French   the man who designed the Cinzano zebra is   as with most artists, through studying those
     post-war art. On the one hand formalist abstract   the father of modern art, and the fifty budding   who have gone before in order to try to go
     art  derived from the experimentation of   Vasarelys who went to Josef Albers's prelimin-  further. The mountain range of the Lubéron,
     Magnelli, Domela and Arp, for whom the    ary course at the Dessau Bauhaus in 1926,   the village of Gordes seen from below, the
     abstract was a distillation of nature; its    and did practical exercises every morning in    tiles of the Paris Metro station of Denfert-
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71