Page 40 - Studio International - October 1970
P. 40

Two Italian


     kinetic groups


     Caroline Tisdall





















     `The experience of the groups, founded at a   of the 'informale), and the consequent barrier   them with only half an ideological leg to stand
     time when people were 50 years behind what   set up between work and viewer. Predecessors   on, and rendered their group stand anachro-
     was happening, was indispensable. We con-  were Munari, Mari, Fontana, Manzoni and   nistic.
     tinued until we found that we were working   Castellani. Their earliest and liveliest mani-  Of the Group T members still active, Boriani
     in a way that had absolutely nothing to do   festations were intended to deflate the pom-  has refused to exhibit for two years, apart
     with reality. Now we must decide how to   posity of art institutions: Massironi submitted   from the setting up of a fine illusion room at
     continue. The environments on which we    a piece of corrugated board to the San     this year's Venice Biennale; De Vecchi is
     worked from 1963 were just a stage in a line   Fedele painting competition, achieving the   involved with industrial design, and still
      of research. Now the environment too has   infuriated withdrawal of judge and jury; De   creates environments based on illusionistic
     become just another sort of gallery space, a   Vecchi made sculpture to be kicked; Group   light structure; whilst Colombo is experiment-
      fashion, and, like kinetics, has ceased to have   N's bread exhibition was an exposure of the   ing with television films, using wave fre-
      any sort of relevance. We must return to an   arrogant verbosity of art criticism. In January   quency interference accompanied by elec-
     activity related to reality, with the social-  1960 the future members of Group T staged   tronic noise to disrupt and transform set
      political involvement this inevitably entails.   an exhibition, Miriorama I, on the theme of   images. In Padua, Biasi is exploring the possi-
      The artist today certainly has the capacity for   variation, using the 'materials of reality'. On   bilities of computer graphics, and Massironi
      understanding, but is incapable of finding a   show were a transparent plastic tube contain-  is pursuing the study of the psychology of art
      way of getting it across.' Davide Boriani,   ing dry ice (the smoke of which was agitated   that has absorbed him increasingly since 1966.
      Venice, 1970.                            by a fan— an idea formulated by Boccioni),
      Ten years have passed since the formation of   plastic transformed and destroyed on a hot-
      the two main kinetic groups in Italy—Group   plate, copper heated to display its changing
      T in Milan and Group N in Padua. Although   surface colour patterns, and inflatables.
      their intensive group activity was short-lived,   This theme of mutation was pursued with the
      its effect on art in Italy was as catalystic as   programmed objects produced by the groups,
      anything since Futurism. In fact, their initial   as in 'Arte Programmata' (T, N, Munari and
      idealistic, and at times juvenile, antagonism   Mari) organized by Munari for Olivetti in
      towards society in general and the galleries   1962, and seen in London at the Royal
      and museums in particular, their manifestoes,   College in 1964.
      and the emphasis placed on activity as    Both groups were involved in the organiza-
      opposed to end product, have obvious      tion of the Nouvelle Tendance in Zagreb, and
      parallels in the futurist events organized by   participated in all three of its exhibitions
      Marinetti, Russolo and Depero.            from 1963-65. As is clear from Biasi's com-
      Group T, consisting of Boriani, Colombo, De   ments below, self-interest gradually engulfed
      Vecchi, Anceschi and Varisco, described their   the co-operative internationalism of the
      concept of reality as a continual progression of   Zagreb activities, and by 1965 the groups
      phenomena perceived in their variations. Its   themselves were splitting up. Objects like
      aim was to replace the public's idea of static   Boriani's 'Magnetic Surface' and 'P.H. Scope',
      reality with this concept of continual change.   Colombo's 'Fluid Structuralisation', De
      Group N—Biasi, Massironi, Landi, Costa and   Vecchi's `U.R.M.N.T.', Group N's 'Dynamic
      Chiggio —announced themselves as experi-  Vision' and Biasi's 'Cinerecticle' had been
      mentalists exploiting a programme of collec-  snapped up by a hungry market, multiple
      tive practical and theoretical research, and   sales were extensive but in expensive limited
      set up a shop, as opposed to a gallery, to sell   editions, and the environments on which
      their products. Kinetic and optical means   they had been working since 1963, using
      were chosen, not as an end in themselves, but   artificial light, transformable light lines, vib-
      as a then logical antidote to the myths of art   rating frames etc., had become viable
      they objected to (Italy was then in the throes    gallery space. This, they felt, eventually left
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45