Page 59 - Studio International - July August 1971
P. 59

affect his commitment to the cause of the   had a profound intellectual conviction that their
           proletariat within Germany. He continued an   condition alone was central to political activity;
           active relationship with communist       and it was on this conviction that he based all
           organizations and individuals for several more   his analysis of political and social realities. As he
           years after he returned from Russia'.    said in 1928, 'To help the worker understand
             However, as the German Communist Party   his oppression and suffering; to make him
           became increasingly dominated by Moscow   ascertain openly his poverty and his servitude;
           from 1924 onwards, and increasingly       to awaken in him self-consciousness; to awaken
           bureaucratized and concerned to establish itself   him for the class struggle—this is the aim of art,
           within the existing political framework, we feel   and I serve this aim.'
           that Grosz's political vision was being betrayed,   It is a pity that the profound disillusionment
           and that as a result his work lost its ideological   of the late 1920's prevented him from
           intensity. He was faced with the problem   criticizing the political system of Stalin. But
           confronting many artists of the period 1924-30 :   this, in turn, raises the second problem, as to
           an intuition that the revolution (in Russia   how Marxist a thinker Grosz was. As Beth
           particularly, and, through the influence of   Irwin Lewis says, by the 1930's 'he was
           Moscow, in other European countries) had gone   obsessed by the basic identity of the Nazis, the
           badly wrong; combined with a despairing faith   fascists, and the communists. They were all
           in the political organization on which their   manipulators of power, they all demanded a
           earlier commitment had been based, and which   submissive populace; they were all built upon
          seemed still to offer the only hope for the future.   terror and slavery'. This vision accounts for
           Even Grosz, it seems, could not turn his   Grosz's disillusionment—a disillusionment
           destructive critical intelligence publicly against   which demonstrates his noted sensitivity to
           the Communist Party; he could only slowly   political events—but perhaps a real
           withdraw his own participation in its activities.   understanding of Marx (which does not really
           As Beth Irwin Lewis says, 'A decade of political   emerge from the writing quoted in this book)
          activism seemed to him to have achieved   might have given him the weapons to fight
           nothing. The spectre of a mass society   back. q
          dominated by technology and militarism    ANDREW HIGGENS
          seemed to negate all his work'. He left for
           America in 1932, and, again as a deliberate   Delacroix's letters
          decision, played the role of 'commercial' artist   Eugene Delacroix: Selected Letters 1813-1863
          in a commercial society; refusing,        selected and translated by Jean Stewart,
          characteristically, to linger in the past or retain   intro. by John Russell. 496 pp with 48
          illusions about the future.               monochrome illustrations. Eyre and
             Beth Irwin Lewis's account is particularly
          valuable, I think, in giving considerably   Spottiswoode. £7.5o.
                                                    Painting at Court by Michael Levey. 228 pp
          greater importance to Grosz's political activity
          than to his affiliations with the Dada movement.   with 7 colour and over 200 monochrome
                                                    illustrations. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. £7.50.
          Although a leader of Berlin Dada in its early
          days, Grosz soon turned to active political work.   It is strange how the English continue to take
          He shared with the Dadaists from the first a   Delacroix not quite seriously, with a pinch of
          refusal to worship Art, but soon rejected their   sensible salt—he is like de Sade or de
          political nihilism. From 1919 onwards he gives   Lautréamont, all of them making use of passion
          the appearance of a man searching for political   to invent a kind of order; icy extremists with
          organizations to whose service he could willingly   aristocratic prefixes, real or invented; not the
          subordinate his art, and this willingness   kind of artist we can tolerate. Hence the
          involved a high degree of active commitment.   giggles of the reviewers. One of them,
          The book is also valuable for the large number   commenting on this volume of Delacroix's
          of quotations from his actual writing, and for a   letters, stated that there was no major picture
          full check list of his drawings, poems and   by Delacroix in England—ignoring,
          statements and contributions to periodicals,   presumably, Delacroix's own opinion of the
          illustration and exhibitions, as well as a very   Death of Faliero in the Wallace, subtle and
          good index. Its account of the artistic and   coherent organization of the data in Byron's
          political events of the period is clear and   last act; and thinking Baudelaire merely
          relevant, though necessarily brief. It seems to   misguided in devoting three elaborate pages to
          me most useful both as an introduction to the   a description, or rather an attempt to avoid
          period itself and to the problems of art and   description, of Ovid among the Scythian.
          politics in a more general sense.         Another compared Liberty on the Barricade to
             Some problems remain. One of them is   a tour-guide leading her flock. Good clean fun,
          Grosz's misanthropy, which seems on the one   like Kruschev on Niezhvestny.
          hand to have deprived him of any emotional   So this is really a welcome book, four
          commitments—`There were the people and    hundred pages of letters, translated finely and
          there were the fascists. I chose the people.'—and   precisely, with an interesting introduction,
          on the other to have given him his particular   mainly biographical. The illustrations go to
          clarity of vision. Constantly reiterating his lack   unfamiliar sources and give us pages from the
          of illusions about the masses, he seems to have    sketch-books, a superb water-colour of the
                                                                                                                                   47
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64