Page 27 - Studio Internationa - March 1971
P. 27

movements I have selected to discuss in
            particular (Malevich, Kandinsky, Duchamp
            and Mondrian) not only reveal certain pictorial
            affinities with Tantra but also share a particular
            concern with the metaphysical. This concern is
            worth examination in view of its ostensible
            parallels with Tantric philosophy.
              Possibly comparable to the Indian concept
            of Maya is Malevich's belief that conventional
            reality is illusion; his desire to restore a
            harmonious relationship between man and the
            universe is parallel to the Tantric aim of uniting
            microcosm and macrocosm. His Hegelian
            reasoning that the universe has no purpose, his
            Kantian theory that art is the only way to
            liberation as it possesses the 'purpose of
            purposelessness', both reflect 'Zen'
            characteristics which are also common to
            Tantric thought. Malevich's 'squares' and
            `crosses' are formally comparable to basic Yantras
            in their reduction of content, ascetic lineation
            and visual clarity. His objects are in a sense
            archetypal symbols, not in the least ornamental;
            in themselves they are meaningless : feeling is
            the significant element. This is shown by such
            titles as Feeling of Mystic Will, Feeling of Mystic
            Wave from Outer Space. His concern for 'the
            mystery of the object in the non-objective
            world' is reflected in the Minimalist reverence
            for monuments: 'deliberate, static, primitivism
            amidst a simultaneous electric world'.19
            Whether this can be related to Tantric imagery
            is doubtful. Contemporary interest in primitive
           archetypes is essentially experiential and
            deliberate; it is not nostalgic nor is it
           unconscious. As Robert Morris said: 'The
           similarity of specific forms is irrelevant. Grid
           patterns show up in Magdalenian cave painting.   images are totally different.       the universal and the reintegration of all
           Context, intention and organization focus the   On another level, Duchamp's work suggests   dualities. Formally, Mondrian's paintings have
           differences.'                              an incidental link with Tantra : his work   a distinctly comparable concern to Yantras: the
              Duchamp's influence on the reductive    demands active participation from the     dynamic equilibrium of 'male' and 'female'
           element in contemporary art is somewhat    spectator. Like Yantras, Duchamp's objects   opposites. Metaphysically, they operate on a
           different. His approach is seen as conceptual   require contemplation towards a sense of   similar principle : 'The Laws of Creation are of a
           rather than mystical and by way of inspiration   enlightenment. Earthworks also demand   mathematical order.'22  Mondrian's work was
           of the 'idea'. This influence is illustrated by   participation from the spectator but the   generated by a strong inner force, which
           LeWitt's comment: 'The idea is the machine   essential significance lies in the process on the   manifested itself in a highly self-conscious
           that makes the work.' For Duchamp, the only   part of the artist. This emphasis on the   plastic style, still concerned with the
           modern idea is criticism; in a sense, his modern   experiential could be analogized with the   interrelationship of the parts." This is not
           metaphor for the Void or the 'deity in the   essentially 'living' rite in Tantra. The Tantric   comparable to Yantras, which maintained a
           mandala' is criticism, in place of the absence of   concept of Samsara, or eternal flux, is reflected   tradition of objective, diagrammatical
           idea. Octavio Paz, in his lucid thesis on   in the 'constant of change' aspect symbolized by   illumination of Tantric texts.
           Duchamp,20  compares the Tantric image of   Earthworks. It is a fundamental characteristic   Kandinsky's philosophy is also akin to
           Kali devouring the universe to Duchamp's   of twentieth-century abstract art and was   eastern speculation. He too became very
           Large Glass. Paz suggests that both images   epitomized earlier on in El Lissitzky's classic   interested in Theosophy and more particularly
           represent the unveiling of conventional reality :   statement : `... The work represents a standstill   in Rudolf Steiner's anthroposophical concepts.
           The Bride Stripped Bare is synonymous with   of Becoming and not a static end.'  21    His work and writing reflect a concern with
           Kali's destruction of Maya. His hypothesis is   Much of Mondrian's profoundly spiritual   cosmogony which suggests comparison with
           that whereas the significance of the Tantric   philosophy suggests tentative links with   Tantric theories. Tantra considers dimensions
           myth is metaphysical, Duchamp's myth shows   Tantric concepts. Inspired by the writings of   of space, time, sound and light. Its texts state
           that criticism is the only possible modern idea.   Mime, Brouwer and Schoenemaeker,   that sound activates form via vibration, so that
           The volume of writing surrounding minimalist   Mondrian became very interested in Indian   sound is a reflex of form and form is a product of
           and conceptualist work might well imply a   philosophy. He read Krishnamurti throughout   sound; every thought or idea originates in
           somewhat desperate desire to fill the western   his life and joined the Theosophical Society.   sound. By creating patterns and curves,
           horreur du vide with classification of a chiefly   Directly influenced by Schoenemaeker's   luminous sound makes the enclosure and
           critical kind. However, I feel the validity of   `Positive Mysticism', his work reflects the   definition of space possible. All objects are
           Paz's analogy is questionable; again because the   belief that the 'plastic' stands for 'spiritual'. It   sounds of various densities and every object is a
           cultural environment and aims of the two    embodies principles such as the absolutism of    concentration of light in pattern—so forms
                                                                                                                                    105
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32