Page 61 - Studio Internationa - March 1971
P. 61

the evolving styles of the painters concerned. His   time in the late 194os when Pollock, Newman,   within a 20-year historical perspective. I think
           serious intent to respect and directly confront   De Kooning, Still, and Rothko generated that   Sandler is heroic in having done it.
           the art and artists without filtering intermediaries   creative breakthrough into the pictorial style   I wish I could say the same for Maurice
           is testified by his introduction, extensive   known as 'Abstract Expressionism'. From then   Tuchman, who is listed as 'editor' of The New
           bibliography emphasizing artists' statements,   on the artists seem less flesh and blood than   York School; Abstract Expressionism in the 4os
           and thankful acknowledgements to no less than   entities in Olympian subcultures : 'The Myth   and 5os. The book is virtually a re-edition of the
           75 artists for their informative conversation.   Makers', 'The Gesture Painters', 'The Color-  catalogue for the 1965 exhibition of the same
           Obviously his research was an enormous task.   Field Painters', and 'The Later Gesture Painters'   title which he directed for the Los Angeles
           And skimming through the book one blesses   (all further Sandler chapter titles).    County Museum. It is just smaller in format,
           Sandler for incorporating so much of his first-  This seems partly because Sandler is also   with slightly more garish colour in the
           hand material in great raw chunks, duly    concerned with describing the evolving    reproductions, and some sparse bibliographic
           footnoted. Here, one feels, is the nitty-gritty : the   pictorial style of the 'major figures' of Abstract   additions appended as 'Recent Writings,
           artists' voices heard, significant critics'   Expressionism. The painters he discusses are   1965-69'. Not that it is a stupid book at all;
           primary reactions exposed, and the meat of   not surprisingly similar to those included in   with profuse extracts from writings by the
           history presented au point.                Tuchman's version of 'The New York School' :   artists (in group and individual statements)
              Nothing marred my pleasure reading      Baziotes, De Kooning, Gorky, Gottlieb, Guston,   and significant contemporary criticism, and the
           Sandler's first two chapters on the social,   Hofmann, Kline, Motherwell, Newman, Pollock,   most exhaustive bibliography on every aspect of
           political, economic, intellectual, professional,   Reinhardt, Rothko, Still, and Tomlin. Sandler   the movement up to 1965, the exhibition
           and aesthetic situation of American and    gives eleven of these individual chapters of a   catalogue has been the most important scholarly
           European artists in New York during the    bird's-eye-view mini-monograph type. And   document on 'Abstract Expressionism' since it
           Depression of the thirties and the outset of   although I welcome his attempts to describe the   first came out—and it is nice that this information
           World War II. It's the most vitally written,   paintings' content as well as plastic form, these   is now accessible on a wider range at a cheaper
           beautifully balanced and clearly detailed account   stylistic analyses seem the weakest part of the   price. But the embarrassing thing is that
           of that complex situation I've come across   book. For the most part they are dependent on   although the exhibition and intentional format
           anywhere. Later in the book are chapters of a   more cogent previous literature, although there   for the catalogue was Tuchman's brainchild, the
           similar sociological/art-historical type on: 'A   is a nice freshness in the way he pulls things   scholarly work (including the selection of
           New Vanguard Emerges' (the shift of the 'avant   together for Baziotes, De Kooning, Gorky,   excerpts, research and organization of the
           garde' from European to younger American   Reinhardt, Guston, and James Brooks. And his   bibliography) was done by Lucy Lippard. When
           artists through the words of contemporary   very refreshing inclusion of the artists' own   the catalogue was published by the museum, it
           critics and in the gallery of Peggy Guggenheim);   words about their present concerns and feelings   was surprising that she did not receive title-page
           `The Abstract Expressionist Underground    towards art of the past is often awkwardly at   credit for this; but then Tuchman began his
           Surfaces' (the galleries, little magazines, and   odds with some of Sandler's personal   acknowledgements with profuse thanks to Lucy
           legendary Friday evenings at the Subject of the   pronouncements on their thoughts and   Lippard for her 'extraordinary contribution to
           Artist school, Studio 35, and The Club of that   connections with the past. For instance he   the documentation in this catalogue'. Those
           artistic vanguard between 1946-51); and 'The   discusses De Kooning in relation to Picasso,   acknowledgements do not appear in the 1971
           Abstract Expressionist Scene, 1950-52:     Soutine, Lcger, and above all 'Cubism',   commercial publication, and Tuchman's new
           Success and Dissolution' (the collapse of The   reproducing a 1912 Duchamp for comparison   `Foreword' does not even mention Lucy
           Club through size and internal dissolution, but   (pp 129,  133, 1 37), while later recounting De   Lippard at all. This suppression of proper
           mostly the different critical championing of the   Kooning's discussion at The Club focusing on   credit for the core of the book is not just non-
           movement by Thomas Hess, Harold Rosenberg,   Van Gogh (p. 220). In his chapter on 'The   heroic or discourteous. It is professionally
           and Clement Greenberg). These chapters on the   Color-Field Painters' (Newman, Rothko, Still),   outrageous —and ought to be professionally
           art-world context for the paintings are the most   he mentions and reproduces work by Matisse,   inadmissible. q
           interesting and reliable in the book; but the   Miró, and Milton Avery as being among the   BARBARA REISE
           later ones are more uneven, for Sandler has a   `forerunners who gave them permission to reach
           tendency to sidetrack into discussions of critics'   adventurously beyond figuration into
           aesthetics (mostly Greenberg's) while skimming   abstraction' (p 151); but his extensive
           over artists' gallery exhibitions, varieties of   quotations from Newman, Rothko and Still do
           early financial success and institutional   not mention any of these artists, or even colour.   Contributors
           acceptance, complexities of collaborations and   And Newman (who Sandler says 'carried the   Jonathan Benthall is lecture programmes
           aesthetics competitions —where more specific   color-field idea to greater extremes than either   organizer for the ICA... Bernard Denvir
           information (however controversial) would be   Still or Rothko' on p 185) is quoted as saying   lectures in art history at Ravensbourne College
           extremely interesting. And after 1945, Sandler's.   `... I am always referred to in relation to my   of Art and Design ... Andrew Forge is a
           wider perspective seems gone. Nowhere does he   color. Yet I know that if I have made a   painter, writer and broadcaster ... Peter Gidal
           mention: the derisive and negative criticism of   contribution, it is primarily in my drawing'   is an American film-maker living in London
           artists work in the popular press and the U.S.   (p 190).                            and has recently completed a book on Warhol
           Congress (Pollock was called 'Jack the Dripper'   This type of disparity lessens the credibility   ...Andrew Higgens teaches at St Martin's
           and De Kooning 'Willem the Walloper'); or the   for Sandler's own historical interpretations.   and Maidstone Colleges of Art... Timothy
           interesting fact that none of the artists he   There are some factual errors (like the statement   Hilton's 'anti-history of English culture' will
           discusses except James Brooks was in active   that Newman was actually assistant editor of   be published next year...  Colin Moorcraft
           service during the war—or the implications of   Tiger's Eye) which also could have been   is a correspondent for the New Scientist and
           this for their lives and work; and after discussing   corrected by consultations with artists   is researching at the Architectural Association...
           the economic support of the 1930's WPA, no   acknowledged by Sandler. One wonders just   John Picton is an assistant keeper in the
           mention is made of how such passionate anti-  how relevantly informative were all those   Department of Ethnography at the British
           establishmentarians filled their bellies, let alone   conversations with artists ? But some credibility   Museum... Barbara Reise is a contributing
           bought materials and rented studio space.   gaps are bound to be created by any book which   editor of Studio International . . . Frank
           Somehow Sandler seems to become vague as a   brings together so much material, opens so many   Whitford is the author of a recently published
           student of the-artist-as-human-being just at that   questions, and attempts to interpret it all from    book on Expressionism.
                                                                                                                                    139
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66