Page 33 - Studio International - January 1972
P. 33

Towards a                                 as a separate entity apart from himself. The   actually of itself, although 'in its own proper
                                                    becomes guilty of objectivity, of seeing nature
                                                                                              domain' (that is, in its own terms) nature can
          minimal art                               important part of mystical thinking. Jacob   prove its own rationality, although this is done
                                                    need to re-establish unity between the two is an
                                                                                              unconsciously by 'eternal Wisdom'."
                                                    Boehme believes that 'thinking upon terrestrial   The form of spirit is nature, but its opposite
          Simon Pugh                                things and ... attending to that which is   is matter. For Hegel, matter exhibits the quality
                                                    without'7  imprisons man in a material existence.   of 'gravity' because of 'its tendency towards a
                                                    Ironically, the captor is not nature itself (like   central point'; it is composite because its parts
                                                    most mystics Boehme respected nature as the   `exclude each other' searching for unity outside
                                                    manifestation of God upon earth) but man   itself; it is also self-destructive because it
                                                    himself who is unable to transcend his environ-  inclines towards its opposite." Both Malevich
                                                    ment and himself. The evolution of man in the   and Soloviev agree with Hegel's description of
                                                    act of transcending himself is at the centre of   matter. Malevich defines it as 'immutable'20

                                                    Hegel's philosophy as well : in his original   and insensible to life; Soloviev as inert and
                                                    state, man is an integral part of nature, but   impenetrable, 'the direct opposite of the Idea
                                                    because he knows he is only a part, he possesses   as a positive all-penetrability or all-unity'. 21
                                                    potentially at least 'self-conscious inward   The disorganized and self-destructive quality
                                                    intelligence' which can 'free him from immedi-  of matter inclines Soloviev to regard beauty as a
          The publication of Malevich's essays on art in   ate' (i.e. intuitive) `existence'.8  In The Non-  `transfiguration of matter through the incarna-
          19681   allows a more detailed examination of the   Objective World, Malevich agrees that what   tion in it of another, a super-material principle'.22
          background to Suprematism. The diversity of   distinguishes man from his environment is that   Since matter is disunified, in unity it could exist
          these writings appears superficially to confuse   `he possesses a consciousness of which his   ideally—in other words, beauty can only be
          ideas put forward with some clarity in The Non-  environment (nature) cannot boast'.9   The   achieved outside material properties. Since the
          Objective World of 192y.2   However it is   disputation between man and nature comes   unity of matter lies outside itself, beauty can
          possible to speculate on Malevich's aesthetics.   about because man is unable to 'feel' himself   only be realized by transcending the material
          Joost Baljeu published an article in 19653    part of the totality of nature, for nature is an   and resorting to the idea. Beauty is not the
          discussing briefly the idealist background inherent   `inert, insensible "something" of matter'"   presentation of the content of nature, but the
          in Malevich, indicating connections with mystical   while he, man, is active spirit. This separation   idea of that content (therefore art could hardly
          writers like Jacob Boehme, V. S. Soloviev and   destroys that pantheistic feeling of confidence   portray beauty by imitation—a point that
          N. A. Berdyaev and philosophers like Plato and   which is the basis of Worringer's empathic   Soloviev does not take up, although both Hegel
          Hegel. Although Malevich had a primitive   art. Instead, abstraction is the outcome of a   and Malevich do23).
          upbringing4   it would have been surprising had he   `great inner unrest' and corresponds to   Matter cannot be taken as a basis for any
          not been affected by the interest in German   religious transcendentalism."         kind of investigation. Hegel's view that matter
          transcendentalism that was a feature of the last two   For Hegel, the factor that finally divides   is composite is reiterated in Soloviev's 'Eighth
          decades of nineteenth-century Russia and radically   man from nature is 'thought' which 'distin-  Lecture on Godmanhood' when he questions
          influenced the Russian symbolist movement. The   guishes us from brutes'." This 'thought' gives   the structure of the material world and finds it
          two following articles (Pt. 2 will appear in Studio   rise to a caricatured knowledge of nature which,   `a multitude of elementary entities' that are
          International in March) suggest connections   for Malevich as well, inhibits the apprehension   `divisible to infinity'. 24   Similarly, Malevich
          between Malevich and other idealist thinkers,   of reality. It is this mistrust of 'thought' that   describes how matter disintegrates 'into a large
          indicating how Malevich attempts to reconcile his   causes Malevich to 'reject reason'," putting his   number of component parts which are fully
          position with the social doctrines of the Revolution   faith instead in 'feeling' or 'stimulus', just as   independent' so that things do not exist but
          and, finally, how a consistent aesthetic evolves.   Worringer inclines towards 'purely instinctive   only the sum of their entities. L5  It is not
                                                    creation'14  rather than ratiocination as the   surprising that at a time when the disintegration
          Part I : Background                       basis of abstraction.                     of the atom was affecting both science and
          I                                            Both Hegel and Malevich describe man   positivistic thinking, aesthetics should strive
          Malevich's work is an attempt to understand   moving gradually towards a new reality to   for the super-material which could give both
          the human environment, and to discover how   experience again 'unshakeable perfection'.15    unity, and sense, to matter. On no other basis
          man may transcend that environment and    But the interim is a hopeless compromise   could matter be established as a basis for reality,
          apprehend a 'real' world. In Suprematism   between the ideal principle and a material   for on investigation it disintegrated, and reality
          Malevich describes a world that is no longer   environment that cannot be reconciled. For, as   does not consist of 'an accumulation of separate
          encumbered by physical distinctions, a world   the late nineteenth-century Russian mystic   units existing side by side without connection'26
          that is felt through the ideal rather than the   V. S. Soloviev states in Hegelian fashion, 'when   but in unity.
          actual, a world that is perfect and at rest, and a   the ideal is fully realized there will be an end   Kandinsky also attacks materialism in favour
          world through which man can experience    to all compromise, but it will also be an end of   of the era of the 'great spiritual'. Sixten
          totality with nature again.               history and the whole world process'.16    Ringbom points out in The Sounding Cosmos
             This transcendentalism is partly the result of   The world process is then the transcendence   that whereas scientists saw new discoveries as a
          a crisis experienced during the first years of the   of the unconscious (nature) by the self-conscious   broadening of human knowledge, Kandinsky
          twentieth century when certain artists came to   (spirit). Spirit contains 'energy' (Malevich calls   could perceive only the disintegration of a
          feel, as Wilhelm Worringer puts it in Abstraction   it 'stimulus') 'enabling it to realize itself'.17    chaotic world.27  If Rutherford's theory of 1902
          and Empathy, 'a kind of spiritual agoraphobia   Man's evolution and renaissance is achieved   had indicated to positivistic science that matter
          in the face of the motley disorder and caprice   through the medium of spirit. Like nature,   was capable of dissolution, to art it could only
          of the phenomenal world'.5   Malevich would   spirit is conditioned by universal laws that do   emphasize even more the need for an art that
          agree with Worringer that the basis of art is a   not change and the reason which underlies   transcended materialism for 'since matter was
          disputation of man with nature,6   and like a   these laws is 'actually accomplished in the   disappearing anyway, the time had come for
          mystic Malevich would believe the fault lies   domain of existent, active spirit, as well as in   pure composition and abstraction'.28  Worringer
          with man who is unable to perceive the inherent   that of mere nature'. Therefore both spirit and   emphasizes that 'abstract forms are the highest
          order and perfection in nature and who thus    nature possess potentially what spirit can make    in which man can rest from the confusion of
                                                                                                                                   23
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38