Page 65 - Studio International - July August 1972
P. 65

blatant piece of Schuré-inspired Theosophical   represents an 'art-movement'.
          syncretism, in the context merely of         'Art-movements' would almost appear to
          Neo-Catholicism. He appears to be ignorant   be an exclusively American speciality. The
          of the work done by Merete Bodelsen and    art-movements which are most self-evidently
          others on Gauguin's ceramics, and is thus able   American- dominated are given a unified status
          to ascribe an undue historical significance to   in the 'form' of presentation of the work so
          Bernard's Breton Women in the Meadow, as a   subsumed under the label representing the
          stylistic prototype for Gauguin's synthetism.   `movement'. The art-public is directed towards
             Mr Lucie-Smith really gives the game away,   an 'iconic' grasp of the whole 'movement'.
          however, when he re-attributes Roger Fry's   It is interesting that the people who assume
          well-known description of Beardsley as the   the responsibility for directing the attention
          Fra Angelico of Satanism' (coined 1904) to   and the apprehension of the art-public in their
          an author writing in the Barcelona journal   encounter with an 'art-movement', (that is, the
          Joventut (1900). Checking on Mr Lucie-Smith's   critics and exhibition organizers), assume the
          source (Blunt and Pool, Picasso, the Formative   priority in such apprehension of some
           Years) the error is revealed as a hasty   `underlying principle'. It seems strange in itself
          assumption based on careless reading (though   that an underlying principle should attain the
          not so careless as to preclude certain verbal   status of a priority; however, artists in the past
          similarities between the two passages). This   have scarcely seemed dissatisfied with their role
          book forms part of a series by which many   as providers of examples which fit into some
          people come into contact with art history. The   externally invented schema of the activity.
          series contains some excellent titles, but this is   The public is thus presented with an
          the sort of cold little catalogue which cannot   underlying principle as a key to the apprehension
          plead academic respectability in mitigation of   of some body of art work, the principle itself
          its failure to inspire enthusiasm. But it is   originating in the pronouncements of an art-
          certain to be widely read. q               critic about that body of work. Moreover,
          BRIAN PETRIE                               perhaps for the sake of expediency, the work of
                                                     such and such an artist is presented, as it is,
                                                     as subsumed under the name of the movement to
                                                     which he belongs in much the same way as the
                                                     movement itself is represented. The work of
                                                     `such and such', in addition to exhibiting all the
          Conceptual documentation
                                                     characteristics which the 'movement' itself is
          Conceptual Art by Ursula Meyer. 227 pp,    meant to exhibit, must be 'cohesive' as a body
          illustrated. E. P. Dutton and Co. New York.   of work and in itself so that the art-public may
          $3.45.                                     attain just such an 'iconic' grasp of the work
                                                     of 'such and such' as is attainable in
          Conceptual Art contains some of the early   apprehension of the 'movement' as a whole to
          essays and statements made in this field. It   which his work is a part. The artist in the past
          reprints Sol LeWitt's 'Sentences on       has taken quite happily to this role and has
          Conceptual Art' from Art-Language Vol. I No.   endeavoured to provide the critic with a
          I (1969) (where it is suggested that      cohesive body of works whose function
          `conceptual artists.... leap to conclusions that   (besides that of making the artist famous)
          logic cannot reach.') Also reprinted is the   has had this required uniformity.
          introduction to that issue of Art-Language by   If works of art (or whatever) are thought to
          Terry Atkinson and also the Lecher System and   have any function, besides fitting into some pre-.
          `Notes on M.I.' by Bainbridge, Hurrell,   established (socially determined) hierarchy,
          Baldwin and Atkinson (reprinted from the   it would seem that all this is a rather
          same issue). Daniel Buren's 'Beware' is similarly   grotesque reversal of the proper order of
          reprinted from Studio International May 1970,   priorities. Moreover the very submissiveness
          as also are Kosuth's 'Art After Philosophy' and   of the artist has led to a situation in which the
          Victor Burgin's 'Situational Aesthetics'. Much   hierarchy of inappropriate priorities has
          of the remainder of the book consists of   become so entrenched in the accompanying
          photographs, bills, maps, weather reports,   social hierarchy of the art-world that the
          correspondence, telegrams and other items of   aspired reversal of these priorities in
          interest which are normally included in books   `conceptual art' necessitates a virtual political
          on conceptual art. There is in addition a   overthrow.
          thirteen-page introduction by Ursula Meyer,   In her book Conceptual Art, which is just
          the size of her contribution being accounted for   such a representation of an 'art-movement',
          in her statement that 'conceptual art ... is best   Ursula Meyer says 'Conceptual artists have
          explained through itself, ie through the   taken over the role of the critic in terms of
          examination of conceptual art, rather than   framing their own propositions, ideas and
          through any assumptions outside itself. In   concepts.' It would appear that recognition is
          this sense, this book is not a "critical   not enough. The consequence of this is that
          anthology" but a documentation of conceptual   Ursula Meyer appears to have made
          art and statements.' Nonetheless, the     concessions for these aspirations on the part of
          assumption throughout is that this collection    artists and has elevated this matter (which
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70