Page 48 - Studio International - June 1972
P. 48

where one variation gives way to another.   Kafka and Buber. It may also have been one   refusal to work within an alien rhetoric. His
     Floris, painted earlier in 1964, shows the   source of his interest in, and development of,   paintings are curiously self-contained,
     beginning of the medallion as an island which   art nouveau, with its symbol of the plant :   evolving as a continuous and inevitable set of
     forms the centre of a continuous crimson   domesticated nature—the contrived and the   variations, which progressively state his theme
     ribbon which covers like a veil the deep   carefree. Richard Morphet, in his sensitive   until it reaches its most universal expression
     space beneath, itself alive with informal,   introduction, points out how jewellery intrigued   in the sequence of the white paintings. There is
     many-coloured discs. One can see then the   Cohen. How he saw in it the opposition between   excitement in following the gradual relaxation
     logic of the variation as it proceeds from the   the natural and the contrived. This way of   of the classification and frames of the early
     veiled openness of Floris to the final annihilation   reflecting upon experience in terms of basic   period and the emergence of the question mark
     of space in the frozen medallions of      oppositions, nature/culture and within the   line of Casino 196o which, through a series of
     Blue Burrow, Green/blue shape on black, Green   cultural, opposing the formal with the informal,   transformations, develops into the inter-
     shape, Red shape, until with Red flash and Blue   the contrived with the carefree, would seem to   twining of the Knot 1962, reappears in the
     spot we have the transition to the white   me to arise out of an experience which has   ribbon paintings of the middle 196os and dies
     paintings. Perhaps the end of the ribbon   been initially shaped by a religious faith which   in the congested, frozen coils of the
     paintings, with their polished tight coils   itself expresses the God/Man relationship   medallion pictures of 1966. Layered over, yet
     abruptly stilled, serve as a final punctuation   through a strong classificatory grid in   continuous with this movement, are the panel
     mark, which ends one variation and at the   which the pure and the polluted, inside and   paintings of 1962-63, each containing sets of
     same time announces the new. The ring of dust   outside, the sacred and the profane, are   differently sized panels, sometimes as many as
     marks both the end and the beginning.     explicitly articulated. Perhaps Cohen's sharp   thirty, which as the series develops undergo
       Cohen's theme is differently expressed in   memory of the sideboard in the living room   their own evolution. Both progressions
     early work. Here the presentation is initially   should not be translated too literally,   culminate in a remarkable group of allegorical
     held in a strong grid, either as in Shepheard's   perhaps it points to his Jewish origins. Full   paintings in which the act of whipping off
    1961, by a series of frames of decreasing size,   Judaism's strong system of classification and   masking tape, signals both the completion and
     or as in Hermes 1961 through a division of the   frames is responsible for its internal orderings   interruption of the work. Abruptly the canvas
     canvas into four basic blocks. Under and over   and repetition. On the other hand, Cohen's   is cleared, and small dense interrupted patterns
     this basic grid Cohen's informal order weaves   interest in the random, the still to be determined,   are stuck like transfers upon an open white
     a series of well-bounded events. This tension   the process of becoming, places him in quite   surface. Here, everything is scaled down, rather
     between the formal and the informal, between   another tradition. What is remarkable is that   like looking at the problem through the wrong
    order and its interruption, between ritual and   these ideas are translated and developed   end of a telescope. Yet it is in the white
     play, can be seen very explicitly in the period   with unique inventiveness in visual terms.   paintings that the theme of emergence,
     between 1961 and 1963. It is worth spelling   The arrangement of the paintings at the   order, spontaneity, repetition, development,
    out this dialectic, for I believe it carries us to the   Hayward makes it possible for the first time to   emergence, is stated in the most sublime form;
    heart of Cohen's work; to the theme he     realise what this painter is about. His utter   not as a message, but as an act of communion.
    endlessly explores. Whereas ritual creates a   refusal to accept the contemporary rhetorics   The ring of dust a boy left has been
    frame for experience, is order made palpable,   is not so much an act of defiance as it is a    transformed into the creative act itself.
    is the condensed message underlying the
    process of repetition, we are sometimes only
    made aware of its constraint, of the system of
    categories ritual holds together, by some
    outrageous act, by some intrusion of the absurd,
    even by some playful gesture. Any of these acts
    temporarily lifts the weight of the controlling
    set of categories so that we can experience
    for a moment a sense of freedom, a sense of the
    infinite possibilities of things. This tension
    between ritual and its interruption, between
    order and the absurd, between the formal and
    the informal, is possibly at the heart of the
    creative act, and in Cohen's work it is the theme
    he continuously explores. It also, perhaps, lies
    behind his interest in the writings of Camus,


                                                                                                 (Top left) Matter of Identity I 1963
                                                                                                 Oil and egg tempera on cotton duck
                                                                                                 2440 x 2440 mm (96 x 96 in.)
                                                                                                 Private collection
                                                                                                 (Top right) Story 1964
                                                                                                 Oil and egg tempera on canvas
                                                                                                 2440 x 3050 mm (96 x 120 in.)
                                                                                                 Coll : the artist

                                                                                                 (Far left) Floris 1964
                                                                                                 Oil and egg tempera on canvas
                                                                                                 1830 x 1830 mm (72 x 72 in.)
                                                                                                 Coll : Tate Gallery
                                                                                                 (Left) Blue Burrow 1966
                                                                                                 Acrylic on canvas
                                                                                                 2440 X 3350 mm (96 X 132 in.)
                                                                                                 Coll : the artist
    262
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53