Page 37 - Studio International - November 1972
P. 37

the shape the drawing contains; is removed
         enough from the edges to do so. Yet it is close
         enough to the edges to withdraw this implication
         as soon as it makes it — to keep the painting as all
         surface, with drawing a part of surface. At least,
         it does this when most successful. As a method —
         and a daring one — it has great technical
         difficulties : of getting the adjustments of colour
         (intensity as well as hue) and touch just right so
         that the centre of the painting will not read too
         strongly as shape. If this happens — and it does
         sometimes — the painterly interior starts to read
         as a decorative infilling, while the corridors up
         the sides look redundant 'empty' spaces.
           In this respect, Bannard seems to have had
         the most trouble with the pictures using a kind
         of chrome yellow interior. Tallahasee Sunset and,
         especially, Bright Dye Summer look unresolved.
         Both join the yellow with a very different and
         contrasting mood of colour outside. This
         seems to compress, and therefore separate, the
         interior, which becomes too much a shape. In
         turn, this makes the paintings look rather
         empty in the areas surrounding these 'shapes'.
         It is not only the colour that causes this to
         happen, but the muffled atmospheric treatment
         of the interior. The effect is somewhat similar to
         that of Rothko's suspended clouds; and
         Rothko's paintings are best, in my experience,
         when the clouds leave very little space between
         themselves and the framing edge. To have
         cropped in to resolve the paintings this way was
         not available to Bannard; not because of the
         `Rothko look' this might have encouraged but
         because the drawing around the interior would
         come too close to the edge as well. Again, the
         similarity to an 'Olitski look' would not have
         mattered in itself. What would have mattered is
         that the interior space would tend to tip back
         obliquely behind the drawing in the way it does
         in Olitski's paintings (or at least did so until
         recently). Clearly, Bannard does not want this.
         He goes for a basic frontality; one that can
         open up and dissolve itself, but a frontality
         nevertheless. He values, as he has said so often,
         a natural surfaceness of spread colour — colour
         that extends and opens itself across the flat
         surface, reaching into other colours in areas of
         influence. Hence his admiration for Still's
         painting (which uses zones of colour rather than
         shapes as such), and hence his constant need to
         reduce the specificity of shape in these current
         works.

         Darby Bannard
         Nankeen 1972
         1o8 x 63 in.

                                                                                                                                 185
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42