Page 33 - Studio International - November 1972
P. 33

Aspects of art education 2


          accessibility. The extant touchstone, grounded   which necessitates such a static privatism, is   communication can be seen to indicate a wanting
          so firmly in privatist aesthesis, can hardly be   hardly viable construed educationally: what is   paradigm. Or possibly, if one wanted to push
          expected to accommodate the purposive factors   needed (and this, at least, from the viewpoint of   semantic rigidity, no paradigm at all — for its
          of engagement, which in another scheme of   education), is a (re-) conceptualization of art qua   prime feature is its exploitability, and such may
          things might be paramount. That is to     discipline. Explicitly, this is the point of the   be conceived concomitant to the development
          say, the material implication of most     above-recommended engagement with teleology   of learning strategies — in a situation in which the
          substantive work makes its intention irrelevant.   and the generation of practical histories, over the   role of past work has degenerated to objects of
          In this situation, that it is (and is physical), is   prevalent domainal inadequacy and educational   morphological replication, dispensation for
          all; reasonability is ruled-out.          incoherence of morphological privatism; that   which activity is offered by bizarrely cohered
            It may be thought by the reader, that tension   the activity be construed in terms of   'histories', one would be loath to accredit such
          occurs between our characterization of the art   practitioner-adherence to a disciplinary matrix,   activity and its apologists the possession of any
          colleges as embodying a 'no rules' approach, and   whose exploitation engenders a domainally   paradigm.
          this complaint (which lapses into the practical   cohered education in terms of guided   'Education' presupposes education into, or
          area) about the preclusion of engagement with   engagement by the student with a    towards something. Most people would agree
          conceptual aspects of the activity. However,   practise-historically significant set of exemplars.   that the 'mission' aspect of art education is
          such preclusion is an exact instance of the   Quite apart from the failure to take account of   crucially to be determined — along the spectrum
          inability of the 'no rules' system to fulfil its own   the status, qua government-subsidized education   from 'decorators of the world' to Harrison's
          requirements — the fault (and there is one here)   sector, of the art colleges, it seems that the onus   'fifth column' in the world, educated to possess
          lies not in our argument but in the logic of the   is on the anti-disciplinarian to prove (a) the   a 'non-economic' value system, but it is
          'laissez-faire' concept. Colloquially put, that   efficacy of 'laissez-faire' and (b) counter   uncertain whether clarification can follow here
          method's prescriptions would be something like   arguments to a practise-conception, rather than   without the prior internal cohesion of a
          'Make anything you like within the bounds of   vice versa, in virtue of the currently rampant   discipline-oriented problem order. Logistic
          what is presently believed to be the realm of the   shortcomings of his conception.   problems may be to the fore in the current
          artist's wants'. And the inadequacy of this has   In fact, it would seem that any relatively   science education, but insofar as the colleges are
          been best summed up by Atkinson and Baldwin—  unprejudiced observation of the learning   cohered by disciplines —the style of both teaching
          that 'it is an error to suppose that an agent's   procedures that do prevail, and their substantial   and research being discipline oriented, it does
          "wants" are given fixed and determinate while   outcome, would suffice to overthrow the idea   not yet seem to be a problem to choose social
          the agent's choices are free'.            that the student is a sufficient unit — and to   goals, if for no other reason than that premature
            Gravitation to the contemporaneous (and this   indicate very clearly the current abuse of   determination here would stifle discipline
          only as morphically prototypal) seems to stem   exemplar-based learning. Though this is not to   development — resulting in the rise of (what may
          more from a loose notion of spiritual availability   swing radically to an extreme Lockean 'tabula   be better connoted by English usage) an 'applied'
          (Zeitgeist) than any guided involvement—a point   rasa'— for 'direction' can be conceived   activity. Rather, the practical esotericism of a
          compounded by the randomness of the plagiary.   're-direction'; it is to maintain that histories (in   developed discipline orientation is, one would
          Coherence, or at least the attempt to reach it, is   any substantial sense) are neither innate nor   think, a prior condition for the efficacy of social
          maintained by the generation of bizarre   'naturally' apparent. Devaluing the role of   alignment. The cohesion of — in some measure of
          metaphysics on the part of the student : viewed   histories would be flying in the face of facts, and   generality — paradigm governed research into
          this way, what in other circumstances might   holding these 'facts' to be tied singularly to an   non-colloquially determinable problems is, one
          appear as mendacity, could be excused as   explicit discipline-conception would not only be   would also think, a focus for extra-practical
          quasi-hypothesizing pushed to fabrication by   self-deceptive but generally unintelligible.   commitments. Current romantic-anarchic
          the enactment of the role-conception generated   It is, initially at least, not so much what the   outbursts, are no contenders at all, judged
          by the practitioner/neophyte confusion.   exemplars are that face a novice (though, of   efficaciously.
          Mendacious recourse to contemporaneous    course, these are not arbitrary), but how they are   'Laissez-faire' is then manifestly incoherent
          norms has to be inviolate, since no instruction   ordered, the coherence of their presentation,   on numerous counts as an educational
          can ever be offered to the contrary in laissez-  that matters — in a sense, the development of   methodology. But 'laissez-faire' is the only
          fake's' inadequate prescriptive structure;   learning strategies. Within our experience, it   educational methodology commensurable with
          moreover, if this were added, in some way or   would be less true to say that coherence is   rigorously morphological differentia. A viable
          other, it would be no more than an ad hoc   denied than to say that it remains wholly   alternative to the conception of art as a 'calling'
          accretion, and as such, given the nature of the   unacknowledged in art teaching. Indeed, the   with its attendant mythology is required : what is
          case, impossible to enforce. There can be no   current norm seems to be a Rousseauesque   being advanced here is a conception of art qua
          ascertaining of whether the student means what   reliance on the propensity of the neophyte to   discipline, the practitioners subscribing to a
          he says, indeed, what it would 'mean' if he did.   save himself.                    paradigm, terms mooted earlier. For a prime
          In the face of rigorously enforced morphological   The role of the teacher in such a situation   requirement of any educational policy, if
          limits to criticism, fulfilment of the injunction to   appears to be indistinguishable from that of the   education is to remain significantly related to
          'Make art!' does not admit of grounds for so   technician, for one of their primary roles, that of   communication, is a high degree of
          doing. No criteria as to the priorities in such   historian, has — to be charitable — been   inter-subjectivity, a quality clearly lacking in the
          making are provided; it is not so much the   usurped. And it is 'charitable' for    present situation. There must therefore be new
          `laissez-faire' cannot detect dishonesty, as that   'departmentalized-history' would, at least, be   (e.g. non-morphic) sortings-out of the domain,
          within the theory's purview, the domain is, as it   rendered innoxious if practical (prescriptive)   in terms of the theoretically public, and hence
          were, amoral.                             history was a 'going concern' in the fine art   educationally communicable; a resultant
            Against such a quiescent value-structure,   departments themselves.               condition of this, of course, could be a total
          conceptions of 'development' are 'practically'   It seems also that the degree of disorderliness,   revision of the concept of fine art. q
          ('educationally') extrinsic. The conception of art    and deficient and predominantly lay-order    P. BERRY, R. WRIGHT, P. WOOD


                                                                                                                                181
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38