Page 35 - Studio International - February 1973
P. 35

the Bottle Rack when I first saw it as sculpture,   don't you think Letatlin gives an impression
       however it came into existence and whatever its   of aesthetic perfection ?'2
        history and exploitation, and I find that I still   Tatlin's aesthetic, his 'culture of materials'
       am. The same holds true for the Urinal, the Snow   also derives from cubist collage, from the period
        Shovel, the Hat Rack. The rest of Duchamp's   of his stay with Picasso in Paris (1913). The
        work, before and after, seems contrived,   straight and curved lines and planes representing
        over-elaborate, clever, whimsical, mechanical   the elements of cubist still-life are transformed
        and boring. The Bottle Rack and the other   in Tatlin's reliefs of 1914-17 into the
        pieces I mentioned are inspired : they do not   `functional' forms of real materials. Steel and
        work simply on their incongruity as useful   aluminium sheet, flat, rolled, or profile cut:
        objects, in an art context: in fact their   sawn, planed, drilled sections of wood: wire
        detachment from the original context, except   bent in curves, cables under tension: with other
        with the Snow Shovel, makes them virtually   materials, glass, string, and so on, tautly and
        unrecognizable except as sculpture, i.e. in terms   dynamically organized in structures which
        of their abstract properties — image, proportion,   appear to thrust into the spectator's own space.
        structure and use of material — which is the   Until the Soviet authorities are prepared to
        inversion of Duchamp's professed intention: to   release Tatlin's surviving work, one can only
        make art unnecessary by substituting common,   guess at the quality of these reliefs : but my
        mass-produced objects for art objects. However   guess is that they will prove to be very good
        the whole enterprise depended on the general   indeed.
        cultural structure built around the making and   Tatlin's monument to the Third International
        appreciation of art, the needs it satisfies and the   was his first fully three-dimensional structure. In
        expectations it creates. Duchamp could not   spite of its grandiose intention (the final version
        escape being part of this structure and while in   was to be 400 metres high) its form seems to
        the short term his betrayal of his own talent may   have largely resulted from the materials — wood
        have diminished art, I am convinced that the   with steel brackets — from which he constructed
        effect of his best work will in the end be seen to   the original model. Disregarding its total
        have enlarged it. The ready-mades witness   impracticability as engineering structure, and
        how Duchamp, his taste and sensibility    considering the model purely on aesthetic
        sharpened by the competitiveness of cubist   grounds, it is undoubtedly an impressive object,
        Paris, where he had arrived too late for his   wild, generous, and energetic, with a surprising
        contribution to be anything but academic, found   variety of views. But it has the faults of these
        in exile in New York mechanically fabricated   virtues — there is much in it that seems
        objects whose completeness, simplicity and   redundant, capricious or merely confused. It is a
        order must have seemed but a step from the   flawed structure because Tatlin seems to have
        stripped and dismembered bottles, glasses and   been unable to decide whether he was making a
        guitars of Braque and Picasso's collages of   model or the real thing. Its character, like that of
       1912-15. The formal integrity which these   so much Russian constructivist work, is closer to
        objects possess is typical of a great number of   stage design than to sculpture, or architectural
        useful objects in general circulation in the   engineering.
        nineteenth century where function, economy   During the 20S Tatlin moved from the design
        and efficiency had been the only determinants of   of prototype use objects — a chair, a stove, a suit
        design. It was Duchamp's achievement in spite   of clothes, etc. — to the design of a glider, or air
        of himself, to bring this whole area of form and   bicycle. What led him to this was, typically, an
        use of materials into sculpture, where    aesthetic motive — the desire to find an ordered
       subsequently it has been untapped, except in the   and rational structure based entirely on curves.
        work of David Smith, who was the first to   A flying machine would at once give form and
       incorporate tools and machine parts into   purpose to his aesthetic beliefs, while realizing
       sculpture for their abstract rather than image   the fantasies of dynamism and release from the
        quality. However the abstract formal power of   earth merely symbolized in the Tower. The
        the Bottle Rack as a total configuration has not   skeleton of the glider is indeed a beautiful
       yet been equalled in sculpture, in which even   structure, so far as one can gather from
       now total form is still largely dependent on   photographs. In contrast to the Tower, the
       vestigial memories of the figure, or the   materials for the glider were selected and worked
       extrapolation of the rectangle from painting.   with the greatest care and precision — steamed   (From top to bottom)
         Tatlin's career offers a strange parallel to   and bent wood — 'ash, linden, willow, cork, silk   (Left)
       Duchamp's, and as with Duchamp his most    ropes, aluminium and even white-tanned    Duchamp
       important work is not available except in   leather . . .'3  The aesthetics were perfect, but the   Urinal 1917
       photographs or reconstructions. As with    dream of an air bicycle for the masses was   (Right)
       Duchamp, this is largely due to the artist's desire   unrealized. However the fruits of Tatlin's work,   Duchamp
                                                                                            Hat Rack 1917
       to move the object beyond the context where it   especially in his investigation of the form-giving
       could be received and appreciated as art. In   properties of materials not previously considered   Tatlin
                                                                                            Corner Relief
       contrast to Duchamp, however, Tatlin always   worthy of sculpture, remain available to us.   Published by Camilla Gray in 1962
       affirmed the primacy of aesthetic considerations   `The so-called Red-BlueChair, the chair made   Tatlin
       in all his projects, even the glider. 'I have made   of two boards and a number of laths, that chair   Drawing of Letalin
       it as an artist. Look at the bent wings. We   was made to the end of showing that a thing of   Tatlin
       believe them to be aesthetically perfect. Or    beauty, i.e., a spatial object, could be made of   Drawing of Tower model 1922
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40