Page 21 - Studio International - March 1973
P. 21

decorative project for the new Gare                                                  rendered stale by convention — a too complete
          Montparnasse. To take the mannerist analogy a                                        appropriation of nature by culture. Shenstone's
          little further, the recent exhibition of works of                                    shift from the ode to the garden can therefore
          the Ecole de Fontainebleau at the Grand Palais                                       be seen as an invitation to nature to revitalize the
          shares so many of the prime characteristics of                                       cultural sphere, and that it was recognized as
          Vasarely's art: in particular, the utilization of                                    such, Lady Luxborough's charming verses to
          the pre-existing store of motifs with no concern                                     Shenstone make plain:
          for differences of scale, with the result that a                                       How well the Bard obeys, each valley tells,
          motif may appear in grand scale on a tapestry                                          These lucid streams, gay meads, and lonely cells,
          or in filigree on a sword-pommel without                                               Where modest Art in silence lurks conceal' d,
          significant adjustments. A phrase occurring in                                         While nature shines, so gracefully reveal' d,
          the exhibited account of Charles IX's entry into                                       That she triumphant claims the total plan,
          Rouen (1571), 'Le surplus des beautés                                                  And with fresh pride adopts the work of man.4
          artificielles', could be taken as the epitome of   Lassus Fleurs Artificielles c. 5968   The parallel in Lassus's work to this
          Vasarely's exquisite, hyperbolic style.                                              recuperation of the cultural by the natural is the
            My judgement on the 'didacticism' of    the forms which he intends to create. He has   'Dénominateur commun' exhibited at the
          Vasarely is therefore patent. Having      simply posed the basic problematic of the   Salon de la Jeune Sculpture in 1972, where the
          legitimately taken his ideology from the   French classical tradition — the opposition   'sculpture' of painted sticks is designed
          Bauhaus and developed his morphology from   between nature and culture — and reviewed the   precisely so that it may be reintegrated into the
          the basis of the 'elementarism' of De Stijl, he   various means of alleviating the transition from   natural ambiance. But this is, of course, little
          has allowed the morphology to run its course   one sphere to the other.              more than a symbolic image of Lassus's method,
          from Classicism to Mannerism without        From this point of view, it is permissible to   In contrast to Vasarely's directly functional use
          recognizing the need to extend or modify the   see the whole course of Lassus's research into   of the 'prototype-depart', which is literally
          ideology. We are left with plans for the   kinetic and perceptual effects, together with   transposed on to whatever scale or material is
          'polychrome city' of the future, which have little   the series of architectural realizations which   required, Lassus employs the small-scale work
          more consistency than that of a painter's   has been carried out through the Centre de   as a means of symbolically stating and resolving
          'veduta ideale', and a 'didactic museum' which   Recherche d'Ambiances, in terms of the   principles which are then brought to bear
          can teach nothing but the morphological   attempt to discover an appropriate equilibrium   upon the problems of the wider environment.
          implications of the development of an     between natural and constructed form. In   What is more, he has experienced the need to
          elementarist geometrical vocabulary.      contrast to the Bauhaus and functionalist   look further afield than the established areas of
            Having analysed the work of Vasarely in   tradition, which acknowledges the structural   culture in order to nourish his research on the
          these terms, I should like to turn to two other   logic of Classicism but entirely neglects the   mechanisms of transition between the cultural
          didactic approaches, which are equally based   need for a continuum with natural form,   (domestic) and natural spheres.
          upon a problematic of the artist's role and have   Lassus recalls the traditional model of the   It is in accordance with this need that Lassus
          similarly firm historical roots. At the same time,   French classical garden. The work of Le   has been impelled to undertake his long and
          they would appear to be less paradoxical and   Nôtre at Versailles and Vaux-le-Vicomte,   painstaking survey of the realizations of
          more directly productive than the approach of   where an intermediate zone of elaborate water-  'habitants-paysagistes' (lit. 'dweller-
          Vasarely, for reasons which will become   works, sculpted trees and presiding deities   landscapers') throughout France, a survey
          apparent.                                 serves to alleviate the contrast between the man-  which has now achieved preliminary coherence
            It is doubtful whether the name of Bernard   made architecture and the disorder of the   in two documentary films and is about to
          Lassus would be widely known in the       natural environment, might be invoked in   receive more precise theoretical formulation in a
          conventional artistic circuit, either in England or   comparison with his 'buissons artificiels' or   paper for the Revue d'Ethnologie Française.
          in his native country. This might be seen as a   artificial bushes, which belong to the man-made   Lassus's investigation of these 'naive'
          direct consequence of the fact that he has   environment as a result of the method and form   creations in small gardens throughout France is
          devised an artistic strategy which places him   of their construction and to nature because of   once again reminiscent of the eighteenth century
          outside the conventional channels. Director   their position and their luxuriant patterns of   — the recourse to the 'savage' as a means of
          since 1962 of the Centre de Recherche     growth.                                    recovering the truly human values of civilization
          d'Ambiances,3   he has exhibited only rarely in   Yet Lassus has gone further than this. Not   But it is an investigation which takes as its mode
          the group exhibitions of the past decade, and is   content simply with posing the classical   the anthropology of the present day rather than
          probably better known at present as the   problematic, he has transformed its terms   that of Rousseau. Starting from the basic
         ,occupant of a chair of architecture at the   through changing the direction of his   antinomy between nature and culture, and
          Ecole des Beaux-Arts, Paris. But this does not   theoretical investigation. He has done this in a   evolving towards the identification of the two
          obviate the fact that he has been concerned   way that seems historically quite consistent   basic principles of the 'retarded contrast' and
          since the 195os with a problematic which is   with the tradition of Classicism, which always   the 'common denominator', which describe the
          central to art as well as to architecture — which   possessed this capacity for inversion and   mechanisms in operation, Lassus has been able
          indeed transcends the opposition between the   renewal. Take the example of the English   to demonstrate a distinct rationale in a set of
          two. Like Vasarely, he is a classicist in the   elegiac poet, William Shenstone, who in the   unrelated and apparently quite individual
          sense that he is searching for general laws which   course of a life-time's retirement on a country   realizations. From this point — moving always
          can be applied to problems of form and    estate in Shropshire, The Leasowes, saw his   from theory to practice — he has been able to put
          construction on any scale. But where Vasarely   poetic achievement overshadowed by the fame   these mechanisms into effect in numerous
          adopts the modern, geometrically based    of his small but immensely varied landscape   housing schemes, and in particular in his
          Classicism of the Bauhaus, Lassus takes his   garden, which was recognized by his    overall planning documents for the seaside
          stand upon a classical tradition which is not so   contemporaries as a model of perfect taste.   community of La Coudoulière and the
          much modern as traditionally French. His   It seems reasonable to suggest that the   projected new town in the valley of the Marne.
          starting point has not been with a set of   Augustan elegies and odes of Shenstone's   Lassus's theoretical and historical stance
          preconceptions — even the apparently neutral   poetic work represented, by this middle stage   could therefore be defined in the following terms
          preconceptions of a geometrical order — about   of the eighteenth century, a mode of description    A pupil of Léger, he resembles the master in
                                                                                                                                   107
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26