Page 56 - Studio International - March 1973
P. 56

the recent past, as indeed is any text that   collectively this range of material is known as art   type, having been produced over fifty years ago.
    questions and challenges, in a constructive way,   brut, literally raw art, a term coined by   It is unfortunate that Cardinal restricts his
    traditional values regarding artistic creation   Dubuffet twenty-five or so years ago.   presentation of madness and art to the work of
    and appreciation. Essentially the author is   Cardinal excludes from consideration several   schizophrenics, since depressives and
    concerned with two issues : whether art can be   kinds of art for various related reasons — like folk   epileptics have also shown tremendous
    conceived that is not 'cultural', and if so, whether   or peasant arts, because, he says, they are 'no less   creative power, as a visit to any mental hospital
    such a 'rigorously different' art actually exists.   subservient to social and aesthetic traditions'   art department will testify. It is true that for a
      Cardinal maintains that artistic activity, in the   than Establishment or cultural art; naive art,   long time the popular view was that only
    West at least, is all too often under the influence   because 'they try to imitate professional artists';   schizophrenics could release this creative power,
    of certain pressures and constraints imposed by   art of prisoners, because 'this sub-culture, like   whereas other mental disorders could not; more
    society; professionalism and commercialism   cultural art, has its stereotypes'; child art,   recently, however, schizophrenic creativity has
    have taken over, he says, and as a consequence   because 'children do not create spontaneously   also appeared in other psychoses, and even
    art has, to a large extent, lost its inventive   once they realize the interest shown in their   among healthy people — a point absent from
    property.                                 work by their parents or teachers', and also   Cardinal's account. He chooses to ignore the
      The main protagonist of the anti-cultural   because they lack the concentration of an adult   products of trained artists who developed
    position ('culture selects, filters, reduces,   and 'scarcely know what they are doing'; and   mental illnesses and concentrates his attention
    sterilizes') is the French painter Jean Dubuffet,   lastly, trained artists who went mad (like Richard   on the creative power of madness per se, rather
    and one feels after reading the volume that, had   Dadd, Louis Wain, Vincent van Gogh . . .),   than become involved in the intricacies of the
    it been dedicated to anyone, it would have been   visionary work (of Blake, for example) and   effects of madness on artistic potentialities, and
    to him. (One whole chapter is devoted to his   surrealist painters, are all excluded on the   the disappearance or metamorphosis of the work
    views, and there are over twenty listings under   grounds that the artistic skills in these people   under the influence of the pathological state.
    his name in the Index.)                   developed first of all out of a 'cultural mould'.   Cardinal illustrates his theme with examples
      Cardinal puts Dubuffet's thesis in the   So, Cardinal claims, they must have been aware   taken principally from two very fine, but rather
    following way : in our society we include a   of public reactions, thereby being constrained   inaccessible, collections : the Prinzhorn
    certain range of works under the heading of art;   by them. As for primitive art, this is excluded   Collection of Psychotic Art in Heidelberg, and
    it is the criteria which determine whether or not   also, because the author maintains that it, too, is   the Dubuffet Archives de l'Art Brut in Paris
    a particular creation is admitted to this   'bound to strict traditions and professional skills',   (soon to be transferred to Lausanne). The
    privileged category that Dubuffet questions.   which lead inevitably to a loss of originality.   former comprises over 5,000 drawings,
    He believes that cultural pre-conceptions often   Happily, most people do not fit into tight   paintings and sculptures by some 45o artists,
    lessen the appreciation one might have for   categories as Cardinal and Dubuffet would have   collected between 1890 and 192o by Hans
    anything that resists commonly accepted ideas   us believe. Several of the criteria and definitions   Prinzhorn, a German psychiatrist, who
    about art, and he contends that cultural   Cardinal puts forward are imprecise and   incidentally studied philosophy, art history,
    indoctrination (or conditioning) has led to the   inadequately formulated, but two examples   music and voice training before taking up
    situation where nobody dares dispute the value   must suffice. The author fails to make a   medicine. His was one of the first attempts to
    of work by 'accepted' artists, whether it be a   distinction between the naive and the amateur   analyse the artistic work of the mentally ill
    play by Racine, a painting by Raphael, or a   artist by subsuming both under the heading   scientifically; his interest was in spontaneous
    piece of music by Rossini. As Cardinal says,   naive. Although an exact specification of each is   creations rather than in pictures painted to
    'Cultural Man has conceded whole tracts of his   not a straightforward matter, surely the   order (as in occupational therapy and as
    mind to the imprint of stereotyped opinions and   difference lies in the fact that the amateur makes   adjuncts to psychotherapy, which did not make
    evaluations about which no doubt will be   an effort to appear professional, whereas the   their appearance until several years later).
    voiced.' Art is seen then as the 'monopoly of the   naive is moved by an innocent vision of the   To Prinzhorn these works were 'the eruptions
    privileged intellectual and the professional   world, and by a desire to depict it as simply as   of a universal creative urge' counteracting the
    artist', who maintain the status quo and who   possible. On the other hand, it would be   autistic tendencies toward isolation, and his
    have a vested interest in doing so.       difficult to know (especially ex post facto) how   primary intention was to examine the
      Cardinal contends that it is only as a reaction   much artistic training would constitute the   Kenvorgang, or central process, that determined
    against uniformity in standards that genuine   'minimal instructions in how to draw' that   artistic expression, which he found to be most
    artistic discoveries are made and, in the past,   Cardinal claims Augustin Lesage (one of the   evident in his psychotic population, i.e. where
    that new movements (like Romanticism and   twenty-nine artists presented in detail)   cultural pressures are minimized. Probably the
    Expressionism) have arisen.               received at school.                       most exciting and best known examples in the
      Aesthetic judgements are seen as the logical   Cardinal cites Lombroso's 1882 publication   collection are the pulsating and rhythmical
    product of a particular education and of a   as the first significant study of the relationship   works of Adolf Wön, and the marvellous wood
    particular cultural setting. Beauty — a concept   between psychic disorders and artistic   carvings of Karl Brendel; both are dealt with at
    considered to be central to the present cultural   creativity, but, in fact, Max Simon covered   some length.
    ideal — is rejected, and Cardinal maintains that   much the same territory in his paper   Like the Heidelberg collection, that of Jean
    the only valid art is the 'feverish spell cast by   'L'imagination dans la folie' six years earlier, as   Dubuffet contains a great deal of work by
    disturbing, alien works'. These are strong words;   had Tardieu in 1872.            psychotic artists in addition to other non-
    what do they really mean ? A clue to the answer   The first iconographic collections of madness   clinical material; he started collecting in 1945
    lies in what the author sees the function of   (a term now replaced by psychosis) date from the   with methodological searches in Switzerland,
    (effective) art to be, and that is 'to give us a   end of the nineteenth century, and comprised   and opened a small foyer for display purposes
    chance to break with old habits, and loose the   works of patients who had been institutionalized   two years later. The specific studies range from
    shackles of reasonable social behaviour'. As a   for many years; they were often poor,   Ferdinand Cheval's Gaudiesque stone and
    guide to how one may do this Cardinal suggests   uneducated and untutored in the arts.   concrete Palais Ideal to Laure Pigeon's spindly
    that probably the only art which can truly be   Today, largely due to the advent of   writing and drawings of diaphanous females.
    described as inventive is that generated outside   chemotherapy involving psychotropic drugs,   There are also in depth studies of other
    the influence of society, and would include   patients of this type are declining rapidly, and   artists like the mediumistic painter Madge Gill,
    works by those certified insane, by those who   so too are the kinds of picture they created.   the irrepressible Scottie Wilson, and the
    claim divine inspiration, and by innocents;    Most of the illustrations in the book are of this    American house-builder Clarence Schmidt. It is
    142
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61