Page 21 - Studio International - December 1974
P. 21

determined to follow his lead, and to set about   would not have qualified for Ruskin's approval;   half-prophetic, half-jussive, an appeal to
         what might seem an absurd project without   it was almost a caricature of everything he most   emblematic rather than actual charity, and a
         even having his presence and leadership. It is   loathed. He had constantly reviled such building,   dramatic contrast between the nineteenth-
         now that the concept of Ruskin's 'disciples'   and such taste, since, when an undergraduate   century city and Giotto's trecento Florence.
         begins: We shall see, however, that there were   himself, he had written 'The Poetry of   The reference to 'shepherd-lords' is explained by
         significant differences within this small band   Architecture'. This was not all. A part of   Ruskin's interest in Henry, Lord Clifford, the
         regarding the validity of Ruskin's teaching.   Oxford that Ruskin particularly detested was   subject of Wordsworth's Song, at the Feast of
            Ruskin wrote to Henry Acland to give him   Jericho, a new slum development of small,   Brougham Castle.  Ruskin supposed, erroneously
         an idea of his plans for the road. 'My chief   wretched houses, in narrow streets with   as it happened, that Lord Clifford had voluntarily
         object is to let my pupils feel the pleasures of   alehouses on every corner, at the side of the   lived as a shepherd on his Yorkshire estates
         useful muscular work ... that country road   canal and the railway. 'He told me once', an   during the reign of Henry VI [13]. Giotto's
         under the slope of the hill with its irregular line   Oxford acquaintance recalled, 'that he would   figure of Charity is one of the contrasted Virtues
         of trees, sheltering yet not darkening it, is   not walk with me to the Upper River through   and Vices in the Arena chapel in Padua.
         capable of being made one of the loveliest   Port Meadow, because, to do so, he would have   Wreathed in roses, she tramples moneybags
         things in this English world by only a little   to pass through Jericho' [9]. The Harcourts   under feet, looks up at the figure of Christ and
         tenderness and patience in easy labour. We can   also owned much of Jericho. Perhaps Ruskin   holds out a bowl of flowers, fruit and corn.
         get all stagnant water carried away, of course,   would have seen there the public house which   Since this was the kind of thing that was in
         with the simplest arrangements of all, and we   bears their name, the Harcourt Arms; one can   Ruskin's mind, one cannot imagine that Ruskin's
         can make the cottages more healthy, and the   imagine the despision with which he would have   instructions to his undergraduates to go out
         walk, within reach of little time and a light   noted the family motto which was emblazoned   digging were merely whimsical. They came
         strength from Oxford, far more beautiful than   on the signboard;  `le bon temps viendra'.   from a social sensibility that was drenched by a
         any college garden can be ...' [7].        Jericho and Ferry Hincksey had another,   highly aesthetic view of cultural history. And
            In this letter we also find that Ruskin asks   terrible, thing in common. A rural slum and an   it is for this reason that Ruskin's philanthropic
         Acland to intercede on his behalf, by writing to   urban slum, both inadequately drained, they   motives in Hincksey should not be exaggerated.
         the owners of the land for permission to build   had suffered equally in the cholera epidemic   When the newspapers began to criticise the
         the road. Why would he not do this himself, as   which attacked Oxford in 1854, when Acland   diggings, Acland, who understood Ruskin very
         would be courteous? The answer might well be   had worked ceaselessly, with little help from   well, wrote to The Times to say that Ruskin
         that he felt an animus towards them, and that   the University and none from the local   was 'as interested in the greatness of the
         an important aspect of the digging project was   aristocracy, to limit the number of deaths.   educated youth of England as he is in the well-
         its implicit criticism of their lack of taste and   Ruskin had been staying with Acland at the   being of the poor' [15]. He was making the
         their lack of charity. Ferry Hincksey belonged   time that the doctor was writing his report on   point that the social improvement which had
         to the ancient family of the Harcourts. So did   the cholera outbreak, and one notes that his   been achieved, admittedly minimal, was not the
         much other land in and around Oxford. The   letter to Acland about the road-building also   main aim of the enterprise.
         family seat was originally at Stanton Harcourt,   makes the point that the cottages might be   The digging had a certain popularity among
         which is about four miles from Hincksey. But   made more healthy [10].               the undergraduates. Most of the London papers
         the Harcourts largely demolished their twelfth-  Given Ruskin's views about the feudal and   which carried reports and caricatures said that
         century manor house, with its chapel, its wall   paternal duties of the English aristocracy, it   twenty or thirty people had worked on the road,
         paintings, its unique medieval kitchen and Tudor   cannot be doubted that he considered the   but Jackson's Oxford Journal,  in June,
         additions, when they decided to move the   Hincksey diggings as a symbolic rather than   estimated that about fifty of Ruskin's admirers
         family seat to Nuneham Cortney, which is to   practical lesson for undergraduates who would   had joined in. Of course, many of them stayed
         the south of Oxford on the old London Road.   themselves, by reason of their class and   only for a day or two. But they had taken
         This was in the years around 1750. At Nuneham   upbringing, soon be assuming such    sides, and that was significant. As they
         the Harcourts tore down the old village and   responsibilities. They were not to behave as the   demonstrated their unfamiliarity with shovels
         church to make way for their new mansion.   Harcourt family had behaved [11]. During his   and pickaxes, they were jeered at by the
         This was built to a pompous and confused   first year as Slade Professor Ruskin had written   villagers, and by the University too. Wedderburn
         Palladian design by Stiff Lead better of Eton.   in  Fors Clavigera about his hopes for the Guild   recalled that dons as well as other
         The house was added to in the 1770s and    of St George, the society which he hoped would   undergraduates came to scoff [16]. A.B.
         1780s by Lancelot Brown and Robert Adam,   reclaim English land from the encroachments of   Walkley felt like helping, but was too
         and was then enlarged again in 1832 by Robert   industrialization, and we gather from this that   embarrassed. He remembered 'the Professor's
         Smirke. The gardens were landscaped between   he hoped that the landed aristocracy might   sweet smile as he half-laughingly, half-earnestly,
         1779 and 1782 by Capability Brown. This was   anticipate the Guild's work by a realization of   invited me to join in the work ... ' [17] and
         in order to provide views of Oxford in the   their ancient duties, their 'stewardship'. 'Long   how he had shamefacedly made his escape
         manner of paintings by Claude in which Rome   before it can come to any convincing result,   nonetheless. Ruskin had returned to Oxford in
         is seen from the Campagna. Once the medieval   I believe some of the gentlemen of England will   October, after his summer in Italy. David
         church had been demolished, a new one was   have taken up the matter, and seen that, for   Downs, his head gardener from Denmark Hill,
         built within this park to the designs of the then   their own sake, no less than the country's, they   had been in charge while the Professor was
         Earl of Harcourt, with some assistance from   must now live on their estates, not in shooting-  away. Conscientiously, Ruskin had sought out
         James 'Athenian' Stuart. The design was that   time only, but all the year: and be themselves   a stone-breaker, a man wearing an iron mask to
         of an ornamental temple. The tenants' cottages   farmers, or 'shepherd-lords', and make the field   protect his face from flying chips, to learn
         were re-erected out of sight of the great house,   gain on the street, not the street on the field;   something of his job before going on to instruct
         in a ribbon development on either side of the   and bid the light break into the smoke-clouds,   his students. Presumably, then, by the new
         main road. They are totally uniform, are in   and bear in their hands, up to those loathsome   Michaelmas Term the excavations had been
         semi-detached pairs, and are decorated with   city walls, the gifts of Giotto's Charity, corn   completed, pipes had been laid, and the paving
         chequered bricks [8].                      and flowers' [12].                         had begun.
            One does not need to stress, then, how the   This is a fairly typical piece of argument   A further point that Ruskin wished to make
          Harcourts' attitude to their houses, their   from Fors. It depends on a mingling of pastoral   in the Hincksey diggings derived from his
          parkland, their churches and their tenants    and christian metaphor, a future tense that is    hostility towards an exaggerated view of the

                                                                                                                                 227
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26