Page 32 - Studio International - February 1974
P. 32

reality of any solid object — which is the realm of   (Top)                         (Bottom)
     sculpture — on the other).2               Black Painting — Red, Brown, Olive, July 1959   Orange Painting (Brown, Ochre and Black),
                                               Oil on canvas, 38 x 48 in.                January 1962
       I said just now that '... the entire visual   Exhibited at the John Moores Liverpool exhibition,   Oil on canvas, 48 x 6o in.
     field . . . consists of one thing : and that thing is   1959                        Exhibited at Bertha Schaefer Gallery,
                                                                                         New York, 1962
     colour'. I've also suggested that 'Colour is the
     utterly indispensable means for realizing . . .
     pictorial space'. Actually, colour — meaning
     physical pigment itself — is the sole means of
     the painter : the whole historic art of painting
     arises out of this purely physical fact — that
     differing colours juxtaposed on a flat surface
     pull and twist against each other, and in so doing
     create sensations, or illusions, of space.
     Painting is nothing more than the organization of
     colour. But all sensation of colour is relative:
     by which I mean that one's awareness of the
     colour of a colour is dependent almost entirely
     upon a second colour being present. If your
     entire visual field is occupied by one colour
     you will very rapidly become desensitized to it.
     Let us say you are standing only two feet away
     from an enormous and evenly painted red wall —
     your eye will so rapidly be 'saturated' by the
     vibration of redness that you will in a matter of
     seconds cease to be aware of the precise redness
     of that red. But raise a pink hand, holding a
     blue handkerchief up before this red wall and
     the redness of its red instantly springs back to
     life, together with the blueness of the blue and
     the pinkness of the pink ! All of which may
     sound obvious. But I am trying at this point to
     clarify two sensations. Firstly, a colour is most
     intense when it is delimited; and the sharper the
     boundaries or frontiers or linear edges which
     delimit it are, the more intense that colour will
     be. And this intensification is of course due to
     the fact that that edge, or frontier, is only there
     because another colour exists beyond it — it is
     literally the frontier where two colours meet:
     that meeting defines it. And where two colours
     meet there is always intense activity. Secondly,
     along all such mutual frontiers between
     differing colours there is always enormous
     distortion of one colour by the other. I have
     placed a disc of one red on a field of another red,
     and found the red of the disc cooling off almost
     into green!
       I was asked the other day when it was that I
     first used colour at full strength. Any direct
     question about my work is always a slight shock;
     I have to pull myself together — and actually to
     think — before answering: and the reason for
     this, I suppose, is that painting is more the
     result of feeling and intuition than of any
     sheerly intellectual or ratiocinative process.
     So it is rather to my own surprise that I realize
     that the answer to that question is — in the late
     Forties, when my work was figurative, and was
     generally observed to be registering the
     influence of Braque (about whom I had written
     at length in 1946). Anyway, it is true that my
     still-lifes and interiors of 1948-1952 were
     constructed with flat area-planes of reds, blues
     and yellows applied at full strength, just as they
     came from the tube. These full-strength colour-
     areas were slotted into a network of linear
     drawing: and it was this drawing which was to
     70
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37