Page 21 - Studio International - July August 1974
P. 21

MODERNIST ART


                                                  1960 TO 1970



         `Jonathan Edwards held, for example, that the   at the same time it would make its possession of   essay. Nevertheless, this paper does attempt
         things which are objects of seeing are merely   this area all the more secure.'2    to define the general direction of the decade's
         mental existences in the same way that objects   The decade of 1960 to 1970 was one of the   concerns with colour in its movement from
         in a mirror have no real existence but exist only   richest periods in the history of modernist art.   an open linear style to a complex linear one.
         mentally. Nothing belonging to body, Edwards   Its formal inventions and its attention to central   It is a period wherein the works of art that were
         insisted, exists out of the mind except   aspects of the definition of picture-making or   made measured up in quality and presence to
         "resistance, which is solidity; and the   sculpting recalls the profound concentration   those of the two earlier 'great decades.'
         termination of this resistance with its relations,   shown by the first generation of modern painters,   American art came of age with the mature
         which is figure; and the communication of the   the impressionists, between 1865 and 1875, and   abstract works of Jackson Pollock. Pollock
         resistance from space to space, which is motion."   that evidenced by Matisse, Braque and Picasso   fused in his paintings, done between 1948 and
         And since all of these modes are forms of   in the watershed period of 1905-1915.   1951, the major currents of modernism-
         resistance, and resistance is nothing but the   Impressionism had shown this concentration   impressionism, analytical cubism, Mondrian's
         exertion of God's power, this resistance cannot   first, as Monet, Renoir, Pissarro and Sisley had   late 193os style, and the surrealists'
         exist out of the mind — one more way of proving   atomized their painting touch in order to record   automatism of Miró and Masson — into a radical
         the world to be an ideal one.'            the full import of natural colour. Henri Matisse   synthesis. Based on the development of a
             Alfred Owen Aldridge, 'Jonathan Edwards'   had borne down even more strongly (or in a   `painterly line' (achieved by pouring paint) and
           Modernism, unlike many other terms used to   more modernist way) as he took colour from   its employment in an all-over structure, he
         describe art since 186o, refers to a specific   the painterly-pointillist tradition and made it   merged painterly currents that had remained
         critical approach to the ongoing traditions of   function more powerfully, first in a complex   isolated heretofore, in pictures of consummate
         painting and sculpture over the last century.1    fashion, his fauve works, and then into a more   import.4  Of more importance, they moved
         Whereas terms such as 'modern art,' 'futuristic',   immediate experience in the large, three-  painting further into its area of best
         and 'avant garde' refer to everything done   colour, linear compositions that directly   competence, visual abstraction. As Michael
         during the century or a specific period,   followed.                                Fried has written :
         modernism refers, in general terms, to the   While Matisse pushed colour to a greater   `In a painting such as Number One there is only
         focusing of each of the arts (painting, sculpture,   explosiveness and power, Braque and Picasso,   a pictorial field so homogeneous, overall and
         etc.) on what is specific to that art alone.   with overwhelming dedication, pursued the   devoid both of recognizable objects and of
         Modernism is thus distinct from both      logic and inconsistencies of Cezanne's    abstract shapes that I want to call it optical,
         `catch-all' general definitions and polemically   restructuring of impressionism to their deepest   to distinguish it from the structured, essentially
         inclusive groupings in that it bases its attitudes   understandings and conclusions. And, when   tactile pictorial field of previous modernist
         on the perspective of what has freed the   analytical Cubism faced the inevitability of   painting from Cubism to de Kooning and even
         components of painting and sculpture to exist   abstraction, they resisted and moved into   Hans Hofmann. Pollock's field is optical because
         more fully in the works of art. Thus, in the   synthetic Cubism and collage; a redirection of   it addresses itself to eyesight alone.' 5
         modernist point of view, the rise of abstraction   such magnitude that it was only possible, one   Ironically, Pollock's style, particular to him
         in the last one hundred and ten years is most   feels, because of the deep concentration with   and yet summing up so many modern
         properly viewed as a logical development by   which they had attended to pictorial problems.   traditions, was self-closing historically and,
         painting and by sculpture to narrow in on what   Of course, isolating an aspect of art-making   with the partial exception of Frankenthaler,
         is particular to their own separate definitions.   does not lead necessarily to quality: genius,   no artist extended directly his techniques or
           The historical origins of modernism arose   as it always has, does that. But the   his complete compositional concerns.
         from the changes and crises in religion,   examination of what constitutes, irreducibly, a   Pollock's use of an all-over, cubist design
         politics and philosophy which began in the   painting or sculpture — a questioning we here   and its balanced area-to-area spotting
         nineteenth century and continue today. In   call modernist — has been the basis of the best   resulted in his suppression of high-keyed
         order to achieve its goal of maintaining the   of modern art.                       colour. In the face of this omission, modernist
         level of quality found in the art of the old   The narrowing-in on varying salient features   painting until 1970 was increasingly concerned
         masters, only now in modern terms,        of artisanal concerns has been the method for   with the restoration of colour and its role in
         modernist art has required, and continues   advancing modernist art's historical definition   pictorial structure and effect. During the
         to require, radical, self-renewing steps. As   of itself. Mondrian best exemplifies this, by   period of the 'classic' Pollocks, Newman, Still
         Clement Greenberg has written:            1918, in his decision to plot vision itself with   and Rothko were moving, on different fronts,
         `The essence of Modernism lies, as I see it, in   horizontal and vertical coordinates.3  Yet from   to push colour painting (which had remained
         the use of the characteristic methods of a   this extreme formal restriction (and these are   basically dormant after Matisse's and Monet's
         discipline to criticize the discipline itself — not   the first abstract pictures — in modernist terms)   commanding works) into its own. All three
         in order to subvert it, but to entrench it   Mondrian's art did not lose its human touch   depended upon a non-cubist design for their
         more firmly in its area of competence. . . . Each   or qualities.                   distribution of colour, a way of avoiding the
         art, it turned out, had to effect this      In the 196os modernist art is characterized   obvious necessity of an equalized emphasis in
         demonstration on its own account. What had to   by a concentration on the role of colour, like   distributed elements. The freedom from
         be exhibited and made explicit was that which   Matisse and the fauves had done from 1905 to   traditional structure, and the intense experience
         was unique and irreducible not only in art in   1915. But, unlike Matisse, the decade of the   of colour separately achieved by each artist,
         general but also in each particular art. Each art   196os benefited from a full century of modernist   was to exercise an enormous influence on the
         had to determine, through the operations   art's tradition, and the artists, thanks to the   decade of the 1960s; likewise, these same artists
         peculiar to itself, the effects peculiar and   broader possibilities of abstraction, created   continued to develop what they had begun early
         exclusive to itself. By doing this, each art would,   from a much more varied base. It is a period too   in their own works, and thus established in the
         to be sure, narrow its area of competence, but    rich in ',ubstance to discuss fully in this short    twenty-year period new post-Pollock levels of
                                                                                                                                  9
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26